Search results

I think it means "Fuck you all in the ass." But yours is connotes just as much sexual assault.

HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS HOWARD STERN'S PENIS...

I don't think I genuinely cared.

I have always really loved Sephiroth. The way he led on the fucking stupid and overzealous main characters of the game was hilarious. Especially when he stopped at Gold Saucer to chit-chat with Dio like it was nothing. Then Dio tells Cloud about how he must have lots of fans who are boys his...

I was reading the rules and I was pissed off about how draconian it was worded.

Spin a wheel to determine the default time. I'm done with this thread. I don't think I ever even gave a shit.

They need to sound less ridiculous. It's a forum, not a country. But why the hell would anyone "abuse" the ability to ban their own account? What even defines abuse in that situation? All I'm saying is that it sounds like a fucking cop wrote the quoted rule. Like, if you fail to fill out this...

My questions: What isn't a valid reason, and furthermore, what is it to you if someone just wants their account locked away for while, or forever? Why the hell would you resort to a default if someone is vague? That sounds ridiculous and needlessly suppressive. If someone doesn't elaborate...

Good stuff.

Turn that rain into vapor. 4IF2lXqcEqs

Visage - Night Train This is good. A6X2NVGFiec

These are some more simple sketches, but I think that they are fun little things. A lot of the body components are poorly drawn, especially faces. I was focusing on the money shots. I am hoping to re-create more defined versions of these. Just sketches.

This is mainly the problem. And if I would have been spoken to and asked about it, this thread probably wouldn't need to exist.

But that isn't really the alternative. There's not really a way to express how I feel about the situation without sounding like a smartass or amoral. I am both of these, afterall. I don't believe that Zimmerman defended himself. Nor do I think Trayvon was necessarily in the wrong. Maybe he was...

First, I'll thank you for actually reading what I said. But like I said, I'm okay with being pinned because I was being crude, because I was expressing it crudely. My main problem with what has gone down here is that what I'm actually saying is genuine. I think that it would be funny if...

When did I say that, again?

Then you're all too eager to be victims, then. I'm not sure why it's so difficult to accept that I may have a controversial opinion. I was not saying those things to get a rise out of people, although, as any intelligent person should, I understand that it may confuse or upset others. But here's...

i'm all ears, baby.

I wouldn't bitch if I were being infracted for being an asshole, but why exactly am I not allowed to have my opinion on the whole Trayvon/Zimmerman situation again? I've been infracted twice now and they've been specifically for posts expressing the fact that I believe that Zimmerman's freedom...

Splendid avatar choice.