ARCHIVED FORUMSHello. You are currently viewing the old vBulletin forums, which are now in readonly archive mode. |
|
Forum News & Information News and issues concerning the forums go here |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
|
![]() As always, you can always come to one of us one-on-one with your concerns as well. Though some of us have real life issues to deal with; I can't promise a swift response and I know a couple of other staff members have been feeling rather overworked lately as well. But we'll do our best.
__________________
You’re better off not dreaming of the things to come Dreams are always ending far too soon last.fm (note: album artwork may sometimes be nsfw) · Fool's Gold · FFOF · FF the lifestream last.fm group · my old music · my new music · pm for myspace/facebook |
![]() |
Thanked by 4: |
![]() |
#2 |
|
![]()
If you're going to have a more open policy, you might as well have it completely open rather than partially.
Imo at least.
__________________
♦♦♦
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thanked by 10: | Alessa Gillespie (06/12/2012), |
![]() |
#3 |
|
![]()
...why
|
![]() |
Thanked by 6: | looneymoon (06/12/2012), |
![]() |
#4 |
|
![]()
I'm not entirely sure I'm comfortable with the idea of a forum equivalent of taking a prisoner out into the showers in the middle of the night so all the guards can beat him half to death before going back to laugh about it in their club house with a pack of smokes.
|
![]() |
Thanked by 12: | Alessa Gillespie (06/12/2012), Bex (06/12/2012), |
![]() |
#5 |
|
![]()
basically seems like a big private area where the mods can tell the people with the problem that it's not a huge deal and they should get over it
unless of course someone has a problem with another member in which case it's 100% okay for a person to report it and the other person to face punishment. i mean, the report system works, correct? so why can't that be used?
__________________
|
![]() |
Thanked by 8: |
![]() |
#6 |
|
![]()
Good job with thinking positive guys, really liking the vibe around here
![]() I find this approach interesting, it definitely trumps private messaging a single message to multiple staff members. I can see the use in extra section like this in addition to the open forum that is already present. It seems like a really nice proactive addition to the forum which certainly cant hurt and its nice to know you guys are thinking more proactive then reactive when it comes to these additions. Good job guys.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
![]()
Don't get me wrong. I don't have a problem with the principle. Just the execution.
Putting more things behind closed doors isn't exactly a step forward on the road to transparency and better communication. |
![]() |
Thanked by 7: | Alessa Gillespie (06/12/2012), |
![]() |
#8 |
|
![]()
I can see your point here.
How ever its just an extra option for us to use, its not the new mandatory venue to reach out to staff. Transparency is great I grant you that but it doesn't cut it for everything. Some things must stay confident in nature and I can definitely see this as a great way to reach out to staff for help without having to Mass PM all of them. It just seems really convenient, having more ways to communicate is always nice. Its not like its going to be corel or something ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() have you got a screw loose? or is it your...animal intuition? |
![]() |
Thanked by 7: | Bex (06/12/2012), |
![]() |
#10 |
|
![]()
so what you're saying is
when username makes a dupe he will spam it
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
![]()
One of the problems we've been having has been that several people have been afraid to give us public feedback. But contacting staff privately has its own problems - you have to wait for a staff member to relay your messages to the staff, and then you have to wait for that staff member to get back on and relay the staff discussion back. The purpose of the private feedback forum is to cut out the middleman in this kind of feedback. Staff will be able to see your posts instantaneously, and you won't have to wait for the staff member you PMed to see a response.
I agree that more transparency would definitely be a good thing. When we get our act together (I'll be the first to admit that we have not had things together for the past few days at all) hopefully this will be possible. Right now, however, I'm afraid increasing transparency wouldn't help much - just reveal a staff that can't make up its mind how to deal with any of a number of potentially infraction-worthy posts. Oh, and argues a lot more than it should. The fact that staff responded to a particular post report almost instantaneously and then got yelled at for doing that has pretty much decreased our responsiveness to a crawl. It doesn't help that a number of staff members are MIA either.
__________________
You’re better off not dreaming of the things to come Dreams are always ending far too soon last.fm (note: album artwork may sometimes be nsfw) · Fool's Gold · FFOF · FF the lifestream last.fm group · my old music · my new music · pm for myspace/facebook |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
![]()
In the staff section I suggested the creation of a hidden section which we would use should a complex issue arise. We can invite the members directly involved and we can have a more direct discussion about the problem, instead of having to PM members individually, wait for so and so to sign on and relay information. And we would avoid having to discuss things publicly and disturb the rest of the board. Staff thought that would be bad idea. So you get this.
|
![]() |
Thanked by 2: |
![]() |
#13 |
|
![]()
this
i would have more faith in this method if the mods took certain reports more seriously
__________________
![]() have you got a screw loose? or is it your...animal intuition? |
![]() |
Thanked by 6: | Alessa Gillespie (06/12/2012), Bex (06/12/2012), |
![]() |
#15 |
|
![]()
I think this should be a pro rather then a con for the section. The idea that his new threads potentially might be made there is a nice prospect. I would love to not see his posts :3
I dont know I like the prospect of this addition. The fact that its optional is neat I dont really see how this is really a bad thing. I get that some of you dont have faith in certain staff members but thats no reason to bash a feature that others can take advantage of.
__________________
|
![]() |
Thanked by 5: | Cookie Monster (06/12/2012), Lex (06/12/2012), Octo (06/12/2012), The Man (06/12/2012), The Pyro (06/12/2012) |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|