Fangu
Great Old One
Originally I was going to make a thread in Crazy shit that happens on Skype but I thought it might as well be a thread on its own.
This is sort of a signal boost. It's based on what I wrote here.
We've been talking about the 'death of the IRC' for some time now, but not been able to fix it. I haven't been thinking about it either - I've just accepted that people are on Skype now, and that it's fine as long as people are invited in.
It was only upon leaving the chat I realised the hassle of the inviting thing. When not invited back I started thinking I wasn't *welcome* back. I was not free to come and go as I liked - I had to ask someone to be invited back in. So to anyone saying 'omg this is just a giant misunderstanding, just ask someone to invite you', this is not what this is about: I always said people aren't going to ask to be invited into a secluded chat. It needs to be publicly available to function as an official chat.
I've been doing my share of getting people in there - since it is a chat that sort of replaced #tls - but from what I gather, I seem to be the only person to consistently ask new (or, semi-new) and active members if they want in. It's what I wrote in the post linked: People aren't invited. People forget to ask new people to join. The Skype chat is only signal boosted when there's a specific event going on. So in conclusion, the current Skype group chat works as a secluded part of TLS and can no longer be seen as part of TLS.
Why is this a problem? It's not, really.
But we're running the risk of missing out on a few things.
Several new members have upped their TLS posting after being active in #tls. Shademp's Unused Text series were featured in the unofficial Final Fantasy 25th anniversary magazine after the editor of that piece (Alex Donaldson) entered #tls. The TLS member from Interbooks Co. who is running the petition for translating the Ultimanias seeked advice in #tls before writing his thread on the forums.
I was in the chat of the Dragon Age Wiki the other day - and man, some (but not all!) of those people are clearly uninterested in meeting new people - which is, basically, being unintersted in new opportunities. New people could mean new writers, new developers, new something, which is good for the site. TLS survives by people's interest in it.
Why should you care? If you don't, nothing wrong with that. What I'm merely doing is raising awareness. There might not be a specific solution to this problem, it might not even be a problem we're interested in solving. I know a handful of people who're going to say right away 'olol who cares it's the Internet', but it's not you I'm addressing. I'm addressing those who are interested in problems related to TLS as a community, and potentially missed opportunities because of no functioning public easy point of contact.
Not everyone is interested in this problem, and that's fine. I just think it deserves a signal boost.
Myself - I'll try staying in #tls more often. (Work shut the port for using a client, lame ass folks.) Publicly open chats is a good thing. Ours is here.
This is sort of a signal boost. It's based on what I wrote here.
We've been talking about the 'death of the IRC' for some time now, but not been able to fix it. I haven't been thinking about it either - I've just accepted that people are on Skype now, and that it's fine as long as people are invited in.
It was only upon leaving the chat I realised the hassle of the inviting thing. When not invited back I started thinking I wasn't *welcome* back. I was not free to come and go as I liked - I had to ask someone to be invited back in. So to anyone saying 'omg this is just a giant misunderstanding, just ask someone to invite you', this is not what this is about: I always said people aren't going to ask to be invited into a secluded chat. It needs to be publicly available to function as an official chat.
I've been doing my share of getting people in there - since it is a chat that sort of replaced #tls - but from what I gather, I seem to be the only person to consistently ask new (or, semi-new) and active members if they want in. It's what I wrote in the post linked: People aren't invited. People forget to ask new people to join. The Skype chat is only signal boosted when there's a specific event going on. So in conclusion, the current Skype group chat works as a secluded part of TLS and can no longer be seen as part of TLS.
Why is this a problem? It's not, really.
But we're running the risk of missing out on a few things.
Several new members have upped their TLS posting after being active in #tls. Shademp's Unused Text series were featured in the unofficial Final Fantasy 25th anniversary magazine after the editor of that piece (Alex Donaldson) entered #tls. The TLS member from Interbooks Co. who is running the petition for translating the Ultimanias seeked advice in #tls before writing his thread on the forums.
I was in the chat of the Dragon Age Wiki the other day - and man, some (but not all!) of those people are clearly uninterested in meeting new people - which is, basically, being unintersted in new opportunities. New people could mean new writers, new developers, new something, which is good for the site. TLS survives by people's interest in it.
Why should you care? If you don't, nothing wrong with that. What I'm merely doing is raising awareness. There might not be a specific solution to this problem, it might not even be a problem we're interested in solving. I know a handful of people who're going to say right away 'olol who cares it's the Internet', but it's not you I'm addressing. I'm addressing those who are interested in problems related to TLS as a community, and potentially missed opportunities because of no functioning public easy point of contact.
Not everyone is interested in this problem, and that's fine. I just think it deserves a signal boost.
Myself - I'll try staying in #tls more often. (Work shut the port for using a client, lame ass folks.) Publicly open chats is a good thing. Ours is here.