While it's made to catch a lot of new interest in potential fans, you don't have to do anything but look at the reaction videos to know who the core audience of this title is gonna be..
I'm not sure I buy that. I'm not even sure it's safe to say that expanding on Zack's story is even relevant to that since, most of the old-school FF7 fans I know didn't play Crisis Core, and didn't like the compilation.
You can't have your cake and eat it too - If this game's core audience is going to be the old-school FF7 fans, then CC once again becomes pretty irrelevant - just look at the time-difference, and sales of the two titles. I don't think you'll find a lot of overlap in the two fan-bases.
If anything, most people I know who really enjoyed CC hadn't played the original FF7, or joined the boat with AC.
Yes, but there's no way that they're not integrating small pieces of the rest of the Compilation that they've been creating for the last 10+ years, because that is a MASSIVE part of the people who'll be buying this game..
I would say there is "a lot of way" they'd completely forgo it, or entirely rewrite most of it - Firstly, because really, the compilation doesn't mesh well with the original - meaning that some rewriting is going to be necessary in either case, to make the material integrate better.
Secondly - this is a remake/reboot - saying they have to integrate the compilation as is makes no more sense than saying they have to keep it 100% true to the original.
If they're moving away from the original in certain ways, which they are, they can just as well be moving away from the compilation too.
I also think you really overestimate the reach and appeal of the compilation. The one with the biggest reach and popularity is AC with somewhere between 4-5 millions sales world-wide - meaning that it still hasn't been bough half as much as the original game.
The rest of the compilation even less - some, such as the novellas, even border on niche.
I think that's because you're overwhelmingly inaccurate in your analysis of what happened. One, there are some quite notable differences between pre-timeskip eager puppy attitude Zack had prior to really knowing Cloud, and his post-timeskip more worn but remaining optimist character.
Which still doesn't resemble Cloud much in any way - so what's your point?
Cloud's initial persona wasn't ever a copy of who Zack actually was as a person, but more of who he was TO CLOUD. He was the person that Cloud looked up to and who he imagined himself being like when he didn't make it into SOLDIER like he wanted, and it's those bits and pieces stitched together, and reinforced by Cloud's existing memories of their actual interactions that made what happened to Cloud's mind in the OG.
I don't think I've said anything to the contrary - and I think you're actually making the point for me here.
Yes, he was being what he thought a 1st Class Soldier should be, using what little he know of Zack - and granted the huge personality differences and the lack of expansion on Cloud's supposed Soldier life, the natural conclusion of that is that Cloud really didn't know all that much about Zack in context of the original - perhaps, even to the point that when the original story was written, Cloud and Zack might have met for the first time on the Nibelheim mission (the Japanese dialogue, to my mind, seems to indicate this, due to the lack of familiarity, and social-bond signifiers between the two the few times they speak).
This is why Zack's story doesn't need expansion to make sense in the original, and therefore won't need it in the remake either.
I am not saying cut Zack out here - I am saying it's not necessarily necessary to make a larger tie in to CC to make the remake feel complete in its own right if its focus is primarily on the original narrative.
Those flashback scenes have been shown from Advent Children through Crisis Core, so there's a clear emphasis on them being a pretty integral part of the story itself, let alone who Cloud is and the mental issues that he suffers from upon recovering. That's why I see there being a zero possibility of them not being in the game,
As do I. I never said I didn't think they'd make it into the game - I'm simply saying that it's not more or less unlikely that the scenes we do end up getting will be more in line with the original than the compilation.
and I think that while we may get a little expansion based around the existing Compilation content, and a maybe a new point-of-view or something similar, that we wouldn't have any huge new bits of content around them, just a different delivery of the story that might tie everything together more completely than the original game did.
I think the same thing. I am simply saying that it isn't inherently necessary, and that people shouldn't get disappointed if that doesn't happen.
If SE had come out and said "We're remaking FF7, and making the definite version tying together the entire FF7 universe!" then I'd be thinking more along your lines.
However, they've just said they're remaking 7 - not the compilation, not the universe, not the franchise - just 7.
I take that to possibly mean exactly that - that we're just getting 7.
After all, regardless of development progress etc. it would cost them nothing to confirm a tie in with the compilation.
The fact that the narration in the trailer suggests changes though - suggest to me, that they might actually be doing a down up rewrite of the entire story - not as in changing everything to something else entirely, but as in cleaning up the mess
(Sephiroth's Masamune coming and going into the plot, and magically
going from Sephiroth's hand into the Mako pit, then suddenly being in Shinra Building, then back to the Jenova/Sephiroth for the death of Aerith for instance - makes no sense, needs to change etc.)
and so maybe we'll see an entirely new death sequence for Zack - or an entirely different integration of how Cloud came to be Cloud.
It isn't impossible. It might even be likely.
So, to summarize - I am just saying I don't think anyone should bank on this game trying to integrate compilation material as is.
There really are good reasons to think otherwise.