I'm currently posting on my phone which is a giant pain so I hope I'll get through this with few mistakes. And I'll remember everything I wanted to comment.
Sorry, MelodicEnigma (such a pretty name, btw), I quoted your whole comment but I just wanted to add on the interpretation part.
I think what also muddies conversations about interpretations is that works of fiction can be interpreted multiple ways that isn't illiteracy, misinformation or bad faith. Because sometimes an author just fails with what they were trying to present. So a text can be read in a different way than what it tries to convey.
At that point, I think it's important to keep in mind: (the most probable) intent, context, genre, and the demographic the work is aimed at.
You already mentioned slash ships. For example, I'm peripherally aware that BakuDeku shippers were obnoxious/loud about the ship? And personally I met one person who actually seemed to expect that it would go canon. I ship it too (outing myself here, lol) but I still tried to gently tell her that it's not canon and it's just never going to be canon. I mean, Uraraka and Midoriya were established from chapter two if I recall correctly (intent), MHA is shonen (genre, sort of) and it's aimed at thirteen-year-old boys (demographic).
I feel I got sidetracked but I hope people can infer what I mean anyway, lol.
Haha Thank you for the compliment—it's a mix between my musical background and early 2000 me thinking "enigma" sounded cool and edgy. Just stuck.
But yes to all this too! It's just easy for there to be routes of multiple interpretations for things. People are layered. Content is already layered enough—that is, authors create situations purposely for multiple interpretations to be had as well. That also makes it tricky. What is exposed through the work itself, the author's intent, and the people's recognition—there's different things to hone in on, but whether we can say the author failed depends on what the source of this failure actually is.
It's like how for a lot of shippers, you could narrow down their reasons for shipping to even a single scene—this scene of which gave a recognition of romanticism that created this understanding. If this happens to also be a scene that they'd argue is
exclusively romantic and "no other explanation" fits or is "possible, but not as likely", then that opens the gates of examination of their understanding. This could also be separate from "endgame" or even character feelings topics—it's JUST about whether it's true to the characters actions, words, and how both are shown (cinematography)—how all those things are written to reflect romanticism. And it could just be wrong. An opposing understanding can be presented, and this understanding could "coincidentally" match that of other elements that would too lend to the opposite thought.
Depends. Everything depends after discussion. But there are reasonable limits, I'd say. Cloud and Tifa having the train roll scene exists only because of the recognition of the very common, romantic trope that it is—and this is down to even the trope specifics of HOW this was executed, shot for shot (so an argument of "breaking someone's fall = romance" is not true—it like most things are contextual). An author directly taking this trope from it's source and using it in the story by mistake, while not impossible in the sake of chance, is unlikely if to good faith believe that the author is cultured and understands media on basic levels. This, funny enough, does apply to Cloud and Aerith scenes too. For both, it's a problem for "rival ships" who don't want to accept it for whatever sense of conflict it gives them.
Shipping conversations are hard then because A LOT of it literally comes down to that. Someone's whole point of shipping is contingent on their read on the nature of scenes. Which is fine for the action of it, but in terms of discussions of "what to know", for the scene and beyond for greater narrative, it makes for all the complications previously spoken for.
But in general, TLDR;
I believe Aerith and Cloud’s relationship is meant to demonstrate to us the importance of memory and life, how crucial it is to treasure the moments you share, no matter (and sometimes because of) how ephemeral they are. For someone like Cloud who was untethered from his true memories when he met Aerith and influenced by memories of Zack, I think this is especially poignant & crucial.
I cut off the meat of this post just to keep my post shorter lol But this and everything is similar to where I fall for the most part. The Remake project has done things for Cloud and Aerith that hasn't been done before, like directly addressing the idea that a part of Cloud's bond with Aerith is false, which was never really a point. And I mean really, it wasn't directly. In OG and AC, Cloud has never expressed an idea that whatever he built with Aerith wasn't real and thus having a disconnect with who she is to him. (including that of any relationship he built with the Party) The ending of OG and AC's plot is expressive of the opposite really, and in concerns to Aerith—he didn't express guilt and regret for a false bond, but for one that is accepted and cherished. The idea of "unknowns" is mostly for Aerith in being aware that Cloud isn't fully himself, and even then, this never put her in a position where she treats her bond with Cloud as "not real" emotionally. And that includes the romantic aspect too, hence the Dawn of Koibito era.
Then Remake Project said "knock, knock". lol
The difference is that OG and AC also didn't address Cloud post-Lifestream thoughts on Aerith as directly romantic (again, to the rejoice of Cloti fans)—but this Remake project decided to specifically hone in on the concept of Cloud and Aerith both creating a false bond,
specifically in romance. Never happened this way before. While for obvious reasons, Cloti fans rejoice at the premise of falsehood—for me personally, I don't like how this is approached so far if that is to be true. If the reason it isn't real is because Cloud isn't connected fully to his true self/memories (which yes, does connect to his love of Tifa), then it shouldn't JUST apply to romance though. It should apply to everything, and even that of the other party members. If the other components of his relationship with Aerith (and also that of his bond with everyone else) can be seen as something he carries over and never denies, then if he DOES feel romance towards Aerith, this should apply too. But, that's if he does, and from my point, it isn't written like it is, or at least not for what you could really, truly call romantic love.
Which to be clear, for 20+ year, this was always my stance—little, unexplored feelings of romance for Aerith, but a deeper, fuller understood love for Tifa. If Tifa is true love, then Aerith was simply potential felt within a situation where, because of his disconnect and awareness fully of the true love, he was more capable of feeling potential elsewhere.
With that said, I don't know what to think of what they're trying to do with Cloud and Aerith, if even for what outcome is going to have writing that I'd praise. Possibilities are reinforcing that it's not about his false persona, but rather the ultimate idea that you can't feel love for more than one person, even when complicated consciousness/memory shenanigans are at play. (i.e. His true self can only be in love with Tifa, so when he reconnects, any romanticism built is void) Though admittedly, I have a lot of issues with this commentary as a concept and in it's necessity to be told here. It's an unnecessary point if Cloud doesn't fall for Aerith anyway, thus wasting the commentary it was supposed to create. I have one friend who offers that while Cloud and Aerith can create a real, very close bond in every other aspect with his current state of being—romance is off the table because it's more special than anything else, and can only happen when you're truly yourself.
Meh. lol I'm a hopeless romantic, and even I say nah. You could easily capture how any emotion breaks barriers of limitations, and if you want to write a compelling story that shows the power of romance through this, that's awesome. In the case of Cloud and Aerith, it'd just have to be shown that the romantic feelings aren't on the same level as with Tifa, which Aerith herself will/does understand already, I'd bet.
I just have no idea if that's what Cloud and Aerith will do, especially when I can easily still imagine Cloud having a "hey, it was real for me" vague moment represented, and this being annoying because outside of what can be argued of romantic feelings they could be spun as he just isn't fully aware of them, certain moments in Rebirth should've been written differently if this is to be very convincing, because right now it's not that great....lol And if the grand meaning is "yes, Aerith was right and it wasn't real"—then this reinforces re-writting too of certain things as well, and I generally don't care for this, but if they're going for a "one true love" angle with no breathing room for potential romantic feelings, I still would've done things a bit differently.