Lex
Administrator
Why hello there
There are a few things that we all need to discuss/ gather opinion on, and a few other things that we need to do re: site staff.
For those of you that are semi-new to the site, we have the Our Site thread, which you may not have seen. The general gist of this is that everyone who is interested is able to share their opinion about our coverage of content. Call this thread a short blast version of that - to be honest, if I thought people would check the "our site" thread I'd be posting this in there, but a new thread is always a good way to engage people and hear opinions on certain things.
Our site content in the past year has been phenomenal, and that's mainly down to Shademp and all of the amazing stuff he does, Tres and his engrossing articles, and Flintlock's Weekly Roundups.
However, something we need to be careful of is stagnation - we have been slow in some sense for a little while now, and I will absolutely take the hit for that. Aaron does a lot forum-wise for activity, and everyone contributes to activity on the forum in a good way by creating threads and keeping the discussion going. I'm not worried about the forum dying, but it has also been a little slow for a while too.
Some Site Contributors have indicated that lack of recognition has resulted in a bit of a lack of motivation/ want to contribute, and this is totally understandable. I want candid discussion about what we can do about this. The following is something I suggested recently:
Essentially, we need a shake-up in how we handle our content. I had a date in my head (December 10th) to go through our site staff and contact them like I did before, but I can certainly do this earlier and think we should all have a clear idea in our heads about where we're going, how we want to handle content from here on out, see if anyone's up for writing, see if anyone doesn't want to write anymore etc. before we head into the new year.
As I mentioned, we had the roundups which were great. What they weren't was fun for staff to do - as any staff member who did them (Flint, Tres, Me, Dark and Divine - I think Force did one too) can tell you, they became boring very very quickly. And since it was just general news, it's hardly going to generate a lot of interest even if they look nice and keep the front page updated. We're not getting paid, so the recognition is really the only motivation we have, and if people aren't too interested in the content, motivation just disappears.
If anyone would like to offer suggestions, or comment on any of my suggestions, or even suggest content coverage that you think would engage people, please do.
There are a few things that we all need to discuss/ gather opinion on, and a few other things that we need to do re: site staff.
For those of you that are semi-new to the site, we have the Our Site thread, which you may not have seen. The general gist of this is that everyone who is interested is able to share their opinion about our coverage of content. Call this thread a short blast version of that - to be honest, if I thought people would check the "our site" thread I'd be posting this in there, but a new thread is always a good way to engage people and hear opinions on certain things.
Our site content in the past year has been phenomenal, and that's mainly down to Shademp and all of the amazing stuff he does, Tres and his engrossing articles, and Flintlock's Weekly Roundups.
However, something we need to be careful of is stagnation - we have been slow in some sense for a little while now, and I will absolutely take the hit for that. Aaron does a lot forum-wise for activity, and everyone contributes to activity on the forum in a good way by creating threads and keeping the discussion going. I'm not worried about the forum dying, but it has also been a little slow for a while too.
Some Site Contributors have indicated that lack of recognition has resulted in a bit of a lack of motivation/ want to contribute, and this is totally understandable. I want candid discussion about what we can do about this. The following is something I suggested recently:
I said:I do think some change is needed, but I also think you know as well as I do that the anarchic model is supported or is going to be continuously supported by the majority and it'd be foolish to impose a new strict schedule and hierarchy on people if it's not what the majority of both site staff and member base think is going to be good for the site.
It would be good for the site to have regular content and opinion pieces and news updates, but it's not pleasant for staff who are used to the easy going model to conform to that if they don't want to. And if some people support it and others don't, it could become messy re: tensions about people "not pulling their weight" which we don't have right now because we're laid back about it.
A compromise is a trial period of regularly scheduled content I suppose, but the problem with that is that we have the roundups as evidence that trying to manufacture content - while it might be good for the site - is bad for motivation and enjoyment and engagement of the staff who are writing them. Perhaps I should have been more strict or taken on the job of doing them entirely by myself, but I felt in part that they were your baby and they grew to annoy me so much that I was happy to kind of let them die since nobody enjoyed doing them (and I apologise for that, because they were a great idea).
Another solution is to suggest new rules for site contributors - the exceptions being Fangu, Shademp and Pixel due to contributing in ways that are not writing - that a number of contributions must be made in a given timeframe or they risk losing site contributor status. This will lose some staff but can only really have an overall positive impact, because it motivates people to contribute if they actually want to keep contributing and those who lose the status don't care so are happy to lose it.
Essentially, we need a shake-up in how we handle our content. I had a date in my head (December 10th) to go through our site staff and contact them like I did before, but I can certainly do this earlier and think we should all have a clear idea in our heads about where we're going, how we want to handle content from here on out, see if anyone's up for writing, see if anyone doesn't want to write anymore etc. before we head into the new year.
As I mentioned, we had the roundups which were great. What they weren't was fun for staff to do - as any staff member who did them (Flint, Tres, Me, Dark and Divine - I think Force did one too) can tell you, they became boring very very quickly. And since it was just general news, it's hardly going to generate a lot of interest even if they look nice and keep the front page updated. We're not getting paid, so the recognition is really the only motivation we have, and if people aren't too interested in the content, motivation just disappears.
If anyone would like to offer suggestions, or comment on any of my suggestions, or even suggest content coverage that you think would engage people, please do.
Last edited: