ACTUAL POST FROM A BLACK PERSON INCOMING.
Barret talks 'black'. There. I said it. Yes, there are white people who talk that way, yes (not many though. For real? I haven't met too many), it's 'urban', but his speech patterns; 'Awright', 'ain't, 'ey!' 'yo!' that is part of a dialect that is almost universally attributed to black people. Here's another newsflash; there's nothing racist about it. Races, and more particularly, cultures, have cultural dialects attached to them. White people from Texas are likely to talk a certain way, Hispanic people from California are likely to carry a certain dialect with them, and so and so forth.
Same with African Americans, yes, certain speech patterns (limited but not including, ebonics) are a trait that many African Americans are familiar with whether they personally themselves talk that way or not. It's not even really 'urban' (what the fuck?) because not only do white people from the city don't really talk like Barret at all, but black people from the Deep South are just as likely to use ebonics and say 'Awright' and 'Ain't.' While yes, I can totally see Barret played up some racial characteristics (or rather, attributes that are usually aligned with African Americans), that in itself isn't racist. That's how a good number of African Americans speak and act.
That's not racist, that's just culture, dude. Why is culture a bad thing that it's politically incorrect to write people as belonging to? Because 'ain't' isn't the epitome of a distinguished vocabulary? Fuck that. It's racist when you lock people into a frame based on preconceived notions, or you look down on them for it. Not just saying 'Hey, lets write this guy based on the culture that many of those guys share.'
Come on. I know more black people who act like Barret than those that don't. Many of which who are not less intelligent, have depth, or worth less than anyone else.