Call of Duty vs Killzone

[Sephiroth]

This thread is about which series do you like the most personally. Please don't forget to give explanation to why you voted for that series. Thank you!

I am voting for Killzone because it is a more challenging and more enjoyable game. The players on Killzone has more skills than Call of Duty. For Example, on Killzone you can fix the weapons with the Engineer's ability and use them again. You can also become invisible with another type of military character and so on. That's why I voted Killzone over Call of Duty.

 

[Alex]

Both concepts bore me to tears, but at least Call of Duty has a very fun multiplayer. Not as good as Halo's, but still very fun.

Then again, a series that sells itself purely around multiplayer automatically earns some scorn from me.

 

[Cookie Monster]

Halo is fucking shit. And XBOX is fucking shit.

Call of Duty, imho. I just think the gameplay is much better.

I find it hard to control the characters in KillZone. However, I do appreciate the theatrical elements of it.

 

[Alex]

Also, the Timesplitters series is the best FPS series bar fucking none.

A game made by the same people that made Goldeneye 64, a game that plays exactly the same but on PS2s, and is more massively enjoyable than either of the two examples this thread is about.

 

[Cannon_Fodder]

Killzone has the voice of Brian Cox. That explains my vote.

Truth has been spoken though: Timesplitters over everything.

 

[ForceStealer]

Perfect Dark was the last first person shooter I really enjoyed in any meaningful way. Before that, Medal of Honor (the first one)

 

[Neutron Ronnie]

CoD; I just preferred the gameplay.

Halo is fucking shit. And XBOX is fucking shit.

...?

EDIT: I'd actually like to see a Halo vs Gears vote and discussion.

 

[Alex]

Halo is fucking shit. And XBOX is fucking shit.

lol but you're american. I'm not sure anybody could take your opinion seriously