LicoriceAllsorts
Donator
But he even sucked at tearing it apart. All he did was take their shilling and ally with two incompetents who weren't even his fellow travellers. I actually find him a very believable character, and if I met him IRL I'd probably initially like him, until I glimpsed the howling abyss inside him.
But yes, he is Tragic, he's a good example of an Aristotelian Tragic Hero. Rufus, on the other hand, is anything but Tragic.
Further thought: he's a lot like Othello. Shakespeare could have fun with Lazard. The outsider, comes from nothing, at the opening of the play he has it all, but lets himself be led astray by overwhelming negative emotions and misplaced trust. Then the peripeteia - from being a prince among men he falls like Lucifer and turns into a monster (twist, the monster is better than the man was) - and anagnoresis, he sees the truth of how misguided he was. And dies.
But yes, he is Tragic, he's a good example of an Aristotelian Tragic Hero. Rufus, on the other hand, is anything but Tragic.
Further thought: he's a lot like Othello. Shakespeare could have fun with Lazard. The outsider, comes from nothing, at the opening of the play he has it all, but lets himself be led astray by overwhelming negative emotions and misplaced trust. Then the peripeteia - from being a prince among men he falls like Lucifer and turns into a monster (twist, the monster is better than the man was) - and anagnoresis, he sees the truth of how misguided he was. And dies.
Last edited: