Username
Banned
Yes. This isn't the first time he's been back since he said he was leaving for a year. To his credit, he admitted that his "leaving for a year" thrad was absurdly stupid.
It was, and the less mentioned the better..
Yes. This isn't the first time he's been back since he said he was leaving for a year. To his credit, he admitted that his "leaving for a year" thrad was absurdly stupid.
Since my other post here got locked
http://thelifestream.net/forums/showthread.php?t=7301
I'll make my point in this thread since that thread got locked before I had a chance to defend my position before people thought I was crazy. (Damn internet being cut off that night... *grumble* grumble*)
Anyways I actually have alot of evidence that Sesshomaru/Inutaisho (aka his father) can be considered canon or at least semi-canon, please read this essay I made on the subject before you call me crazy.
http://forum.fanfiction.net/topic/8031/41501716/1/
As for how its similiar to the Cloti couple, and to the Clot vs Clerith love triangle..... I will explain that later in this thread once all you guys have read my essay and don't think I'm so crazy.
my moral opinion is that straight incest is wrong but gay incest is okay
I refuse to believe this level of crazy could be contained in more than one person.
She's not a troll, she's just really serious about her gay, incestuous shipping. She's also hikariofdark who was a really wanky rper if I could just find the write-up...I'm certain she has to be a troll. I mean, I refuse to believe anyone could fail that much and not have it be deliberate.
I'm certain she has to be a troll. I mean, I refuse to believe anyone could fail that much and not have it be deliberate.
It's a widely known fact that at least half the users on Conservapedia are also trolls.
EDIT: What is this I don't even...
2nd EDIT: No srsly, what the fuck is this about?? I srsly don't understand this pairing at all
~ Raz
Crazy girl: Hey at least it's men having to go through with that instead of women.
The icing on the cake is that this argument is supposedly valid because she's a 'feminist'