Lex
Administrator
Hi folks, as discussed in the nominations thread, the following people have been nominated for modship:
CrashOuch
Chloe Frazer (Carlie)
Fancy
BforB (B)
Minato (Roger)
Tenny
Shub Niggurath (Mage)
Howl (Withdrawn)
Lith
Kionae
Interslicery (Withdrawn)
@Shub Niggurath I only saw your comment about clarifying whether people are allowed to nominate themselves or not as I was going through the thread to collate this list of names, apologies for missing it. People were/ are allowed to nominate themselves. To avoid holding up the process I'm inclined to continue with the voting now and if people who weren't nominated want to nominate themselves, we can reset the voting - having said that, I'm going to give it til Friday to open voting to the board at large.
VOTING
I still want to go with a points based ranking system with minor negatives so that people can express their views in an impartial way but also give fair representation to everyone on the list.
We currently have 9 candidates, so my proposal is that a single vote might look like this:
Candidate 1 + 10
Candidate 2 + 8
Candidate 3 + 6
Candidate 4 + 4
Candidate 5 + 3
Candidate 6 + 2
Candidate 7 0
Candidate 8 - 1, - 2, - 3, - 4 (or 0)
Candidate 9 - 1, - 2, - 3, - 4 (or 0)
You must list all candidates but may only assign the positive vote numbers listed here once (so +10 can only be given once to a single candidate, same for 8, 6, 4, 3, 2). The negative and neutral votes can be assigned to the rest of the candidates as you see fit.
I know that's a little bit complicated, but it's a robust way to gauge the community feeling for a person, should prevent votes being too close and I think also makes everyone think a little bit about the candidates.
The community may use this thread to pose questions to the candidates - we've done this in the past and it can be a good way to feel out how a person would respond to certain situations, which is obviously an important aspect of the role.
To give an extra margin for people to nominate or nominate themselves, I'm proposing to commence with voting in the next few days rather than immediately as originally proposed.
I should also say that mods/ admin have an unfair advantage in that the votes will be collated and counted in the staff section - we can combat this by having mods/ admin vote first, but I'm not sure how necessary that is. Feel free to discuss everything I've put here for now
CrashOuch
Chloe Frazer (Carlie)
Fancy
BforB (B)
Minato (Roger)
Tenny
Shub Niggurath (Mage)
Lith
Kionae
@Shub Niggurath I only saw your comment about clarifying whether people are allowed to nominate themselves or not as I was going through the thread to collate this list of names, apologies for missing it. People were/ are allowed to nominate themselves. To avoid holding up the process I'm inclined to continue with the voting now and if people who weren't nominated want to nominate themselves, we can reset the voting - having said that, I'm going to give it til Friday to open voting to the board at large.
VOTING
I still want to go with a points based ranking system with minor negatives so that people can express their views in an impartial way but also give fair representation to everyone on the list.
We currently have 9 candidates, so my proposal is that a single vote might look like this:
Candidate 1 + 10
Candidate 2 + 8
Candidate 3 + 6
Candidate 4 + 4
Candidate 5 + 3
Candidate 6 + 2
Candidate 7 0
Candidate 8 - 1, - 2, - 3, - 4 (or 0)
Candidate 9 - 1, - 2, - 3, - 4 (or 0)
You must list all candidates but may only assign the positive vote numbers listed here once (so +10 can only be given once to a single candidate, same for 8, 6, 4, 3, 2). The negative and neutral votes can be assigned to the rest of the candidates as you see fit.
I know that's a little bit complicated, but it's a robust way to gauge the community feeling for a person, should prevent votes being too close and I think also makes everyone think a little bit about the candidates.
The community may use this thread to pose questions to the candidates - we've done this in the past and it can be a good way to feel out how a person would respond to certain situations, which is obviously an important aspect of the role.
To give an extra margin for people to nominate or nominate themselves, I'm proposing to commence with voting in the next few days rather than immediately as originally proposed.
I should also say that mods/ admin have an unfair advantage in that the votes will be collated and counted in the staff section - we can combat this by having mods/ admin vote first, but I'm not sure how necessary that is. Feel free to discuss everything I've put here for now
Last edited: