Theozilla
Kaiju Member
Having read through the various standpoints and perusing the links, etc., I think this debate has lost its way a little.
[/B]
If Looneymoon's last post is anything to go by, it has become a shameless parody of a clearly misunderstood convention.
Pretty girls get pushed to the limelight in every form of media, films are a classic example. Look at JK Rowling, she was a frump when the first Harry Potter book was released, now she's immaculately dressed because she's in the public focus. You think Lara Croft would have been such a successful moneymaker if she'd been left as her original design intended? Fuck no!
Let's face it, society as a whole gets a kick out of aesthetics. Mother Teresa vs. Princess Diana, no contest. Mother Teresa was by far the bigger conributor to humanity, but Princess Diana was a doe-eyed heroine who walked from a Royal marriage smelling of roses.
I'm not saying it's right, but that's how it is. Targeting one medium isn't going to make a jot of difference.
While it is true that sex/beauty/etc. sells there are ways it can be done more tastefully than not.
e.g. Elisa Maza from Gargoyles has very beautiful character design but she is also an amazingly well written character who actively participates in the plot even if she is not the most physically capable character on the show.