ClerithRaven
DIE-HARD CLERITH
- AKA
- Ren, ClerithRaven, Lunafresca's Raven
OHMYGOD YOU'RE FILIPINO TOO!!!!!!!!!!!
I think Quex and I have said it..?
Maybe because we're in the LTD.
But seriously, I don't view them as attacks anyway.
For you saying that friendship doesn't need to be confirmed.
They did it through actions too as Zack lay dying.
Funny that only Tifa was embarrassed. And Cloud didn't do a thing. It was only Tifa who was embarrassed. Can I hear your opinion on that?
That would be hard to do. We have different terms in our language. One Filipino term can be translated to a not of English ones, and vice versa.
Err. I was not making an interpretation of showing preferences. I was presenting a could-have-been scenario where nothing else was shown or concluded-"since we didn't know what exactly happened, this could've happened".
And I was saying that maybe feelings of wanting to move on, start over their friendship, desire to save the world together could have been what their shared.
It's good for the health as I believe.
Yehp. But that doesn't mean that either side will stop shipping what they want to ship. It's the solid confirmation that I think is what's missing. Something that's blatantly shown, like Tidus and Yuna hugging before Tidus went back to being just a "dream" made by the Fayth.
Err, I don't argue for canonity either. I just argue for Clerith.
Uhm. You got a standard for knowing whether a question was answered well or not? Huh. How does that happen?
Anyways, if that's what's gonna clear your mind. But I still don't get it. What would clarifying whether she's arguing for canon or not do? You'd still be arguing whether Cloud loves Aerith or not. Same old same old.
What would change if she did answer your question?
It is her website so I think she's free to do whatever she wants in there.
If this is so then answering the questions I provided will confirm her stance. I just want clarification from her, using the outline.
I think Quex and I have said it..?
Danseru-kun said:Why do I get the impression that my questions are viewed as attacks?
Maybe because we're in the LTD.
But seriously, I don't view them as attacks anyway.
Danseru-kun said:You used the "were friends right?" so I assumed you talked about the truck scene.
For you saying that friendship doesn't need to be confirmed.
Danseru-kun said:Um... was it difficult to express them? Yeah it was because Cloud is incoherent while Zack is dying. Yeah it was hard to communicate under those conditions. But hey, it was through... WORDS.
They did it through actions too as Zack lay dying.
Danseru-kun said:I'm sorry, I meant "cover her head," but she does go down to the floor in the HA. In the video she did that thingy, I was not good at narrating actions.
Funny that only Tifa was embarrassed. And Cloud didn't do a thing. It was only Tifa who was embarrassed. Can I hear your opinion on that?
Danseru-kun said:"Dumapa hanggang tuhod, tinakpan ang ulo at napadapa ng tuluyan" Someone translate that for me.
That would be hard to do. We have different terms in our language. One Filipino term can be translated to a not of English ones, and vice versa.
Danseru-kun said:You're free to interpret and there's no debate in preference. But in this debate, we're not talking about preferences, it's about what the creators intend.
Err. I was not making an interpretation of showing preferences. I was presenting a could-have-been scenario where nothing else was shown or concluded-"since we didn't know what exactly happened, this could've happened".
Danseru-kun said:We are talking about the HA scene here where mutual, I repeat mutual, feelings were shared and they "confirmed that their feelings match." If the guy doesn't feel the same, it's not mutual and nothing matches. Pure logic.
And I was saying that maybe feelings of wanting to move on, start over their friendship, desire to save the world together could have been what their shared.
Danseru-kun said:I prefer chocolate, dark choco ^^,
It's good for the health as I believe.
Danseru-kun said:The game is open for interpretation and each has her/his own. We're debating on the interpretation that's what it's supposed to be, what the creator themselves acknowledge.
Danseru-kun said:Whether to accept the creator's stand or not is another issue though.
Yehp. But that doesn't mean that either side will stop shipping what they want to ship. It's the solid confirmation that I think is what's missing. Something that's blatantly shown, like Tidus and Yuna hugging before Tidus went back to being just a "dream" made by the Fayth.
Danseru-kun said:Arguments take off because of a notion. That's precisely the problem. She mixes her arguments for Clerith to her argument of non-canonity, making her real stand confusing. I prefer that she keeps them separate and stick to one thing at a time. Clerith and non canonity are mutually exclusive. Both of them cannot happen at the same time.
Err, I don't argue for canonity either. I just argue for Clerith.
Danseru-kun said:If she answers well then I will applaud her. If not, then her unsatisfactory answers will speak for herself. I don't need to question her further.
Uhm. You got a standard for knowing whether a question was answered well or not? Huh. How does that happen?
Anyways, if that's what's gonna clear your mind. But I still don't get it. What would clarifying whether she's arguing for canon or not do? You'd still be arguing whether Cloud loves Aerith or not. Same old same old.
What would change if she did answer your question?
GiddyUnicorn said:I'm pretty sure she's still allowed to express her own beliefs in her own website....I hope?
It is her website so I think she's free to do whatever she wants in there.