Cat Rage Room
Great Old One
- AKA
- Mog
Okay, maybe not, but considering the amount of information we've learned about the series, and the amount of insight that games like Dissidia has given on the characters of the franchise, I thought that maybe we could take a crack at a tier list of the heroes and villains. Just a few guidelines though to keep things well organized and to maintain topic flow.
1. The villains and the heroes both have their own separate lists. At least for now. This way, this gets rid of all WHO'S STRONGER CLOD OR SEFIROTH arguments at least until we organize both heroes/villains somewhat. Maybe we could actually get into that later into the topic, but for now, let's keep them separate.
2. No gameplay used as a basis of an argument. At least, not as a backbone to an argument. Sure, postulating Cloud's Omnislash into an approximation of his abilities are fine because it's consistent, but saying that Squall could beat Warrior of Light because it's way easier to get 9999 HP in FF8 is just dumb. Also using equipment that can be gained in a heroes respective games to form an argument is kinda dumb, too. Common sense, please.
3. All things considered. These tier lists are assuming the abilities that can be approximated based on the maximum what we see and generally know of that character. Try to keep a 'well he COULD IF HE WANTED TO AND HE HAD A DAY AND A HALF TO CHARGE UP' and 'UNREALIZED POTENTIAL' arguments to a reasonable minimum. However of course that means that we're all assuming that the protagonists/antagonists are at their bests. Of course you don't necessarily have to.
For the sake of familiarity, let's use the Dissidia lineup.
VILLAINS
Garland
Emperor
Cloud of Darkness
Golbez
ExDeath
Kefka
Sephiroth
Ultimecia
Kuja
Jecht
HEROES
Warrior of Light
Firion
Onion Knight
Cecil
Bartz
Terra
Cloud
Squall
Zidane
Tidus
Go!
1. The villains and the heroes both have their own separate lists. At least for now. This way, this gets rid of all WHO'S STRONGER CLOD OR SEFIROTH arguments at least until we organize both heroes/villains somewhat. Maybe we could actually get into that later into the topic, but for now, let's keep them separate.
2. No gameplay used as a basis of an argument. At least, not as a backbone to an argument. Sure, postulating Cloud's Omnislash into an approximation of his abilities are fine because it's consistent, but saying that Squall could beat Warrior of Light because it's way easier to get 9999 HP in FF8 is just dumb. Also using equipment that can be gained in a heroes respective games to form an argument is kinda dumb, too. Common sense, please.
3. All things considered. These tier lists are assuming the abilities that can be approximated based on the maximum what we see and generally know of that character. Try to keep a 'well he COULD IF HE WANTED TO AND HE HAD A DAY AND A HALF TO CHARGE UP' and 'UNREALIZED POTENTIAL' arguments to a reasonable minimum. However of course that means that we're all assuming that the protagonists/antagonists are at their bests. Of course you don't necessarily have to.
For the sake of familiarity, let's use the Dissidia lineup.
VILLAINS
Garland
Emperor
Cloud of Darkness
Golbez
ExDeath
Kefka
Sephiroth
Ultimecia
Kuja
Jecht
HEROES
Warrior of Light
Firion
Onion Knight
Cecil
Bartz
Terra
Cloud
Squall
Zidane
Tidus
Go!