Theozilla
Kaiju Member
I already stated my thoughts on the final chapter/ending, but for those curious these are my thought on the Isayama/series' controversies in general:
So ultimately, I personally don't believe that the series espouses ideas that fascism and nationalism are good, but it's full of clumsily used metaphors and equivalences that can and are misconstrued by progressives and conservatives alike. It's a mess, but I’ve found it to be a compelling mess.
While I personally think that there isn’t enough evidence to declare that the @migiteorerno Twitter was Isayama’s private account, the seldomusings WordPress blog (https://seldomusings.wordpress.com) wasn’t exactly pulling claims out of thin air, there was some circumstantial evidence that was enough for the blogger (and many others) to be convinced of said accusation. And it’s not like the seldomusings blogger had it out for Isayama or anything, part of why they wrote the blog post was that they were surprised by the possibility that @migiteorerno could be Isayama, because they didn’t think the Attack on Titan series reflected the sentiments of the @migiteorerno account (similar to how many people end up finding out about the Ender’s Game series and Orson Scott Card’s bigoted views).
But even discounting the @migiteorerno controversy, in regard to the Dot Pixis design, while Akiyama Yoshifuru may not have been guilty of crimes on the level of someone like Hideki Tojo, he was still a Japanese Imperial general and thus still complicit with many of the atrocities committed in the name of the Japanese Empire. As such, it’s understandable why many Koreans (and others) would still take offense to such a design choice made by Isayama, plus Isayama’s comment of "I respect for leading such a simple and frugal life" regarding Yoshifuru. Also, apparently the year AoT first came out as a manga was the same year a Japanese mini-series on Yoshifuru was broadcasted on Japanese television (that portrayed him as a "complex" figure, like how a lot of contemporary USA media portrays the founding fathers as moral characters). Which I wouldn't be surprised influenced Isayama’s design choice/comments on Yoshifuru.
Furthermore, Mikasa was also named after an Imperial Japanese Battleship that served during the Russo-Japan War. While it is true that the practice of naming anime/manga characters after Imperial era vehicles is a not uncommon practice (like Evangelion is chalk full of such examples, e.g.,https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/VehicularThemeNaming ) it’s at best still a questionable creative trope in Japanese creatives.
Also Erwin Smith, while significantly inspired by a Watchmen character (and a performer from a Paris Hilton music video), was also almost assuredly (I don’t recall if Isayama ever officially commented on this or not, I only know secondary sources have said Isayama stated such, but I personally have never seen the primary source from Isayama himself) partially based on Erwin Rommel, a German commander from WWII, who is popularly known for being forced to commit suicide (the actual date of which is Erwin Smith’s fictional birthday, October 14th) due to his involvement in a failed plot to assassinate Hitler, but his actual legacy and moral character is, to put it lightly, far more complicated/ethically incriminating. The pop cultural rehabilitation of Rommel is actually a relatively well-known phenomenon in historian/academic circles dubbed the “Rommel myth” (look it up to learn more, plus the Holocaust Museum’s entry on Rommel https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/erwin-rommel ). While it is relatively likely Isayama is another individual whose main knowledge of Rommel was through said myth, it is still another irresponsible/not good creative choice and gaffe made by Isayama.
And while I think that the text of the Attack on Titan series is pretty critical of issues like nationalism, militarism, and racial oppression, etc. The narrative isn’t without its issues, most notably the choice of making there be a “reason” for the Eldians oppression (an unfortunately relatively common trope to other fantasy and sci-fi media, in both anime and superhero works, like the X-Men). Which is better explained by this critic
And regardless of whether or not Isayama intentionally was drawing from Zionist conspiracy theories to create the backstory for the Eldians, even if the modern day Eldians are portrayed as the "good guys"/unjustly oppressed. Like Jacob Chapman said, it’s still giving a "reason" for the oppression, like the X-Men, but the real-world context/imagery/symbolism makes it even more irresponsible/not great.
While such gaffes may be excusable/not a breaking point/not a deciding factor to some, it isn’t unbelievable that it wouldn’t be for others. Like the series itself, the Isayama controversy isn’t a black-and-white issue either, and while I personally feel like there isn't enough evidence to declare Isayama and/or his manga as categorically far-right wing manga, at least intentionally on the creator's part.
I really think so many interpretations of the series' subtext, really require a presumption of whether or not one believes that Twitter account was Isayama's or not. Because if it was, I can totally agree that the subtext has likely been far-right sympathetic, but if it wasn't (and I personally think there isn't enough evidence to say that it is/was) I think it indicates more Isayama being really irresponsible/clumsy in his use of imagery.
But even discounting the @migiteorerno controversy, in regard to the Dot Pixis design, while Akiyama Yoshifuru may not have been guilty of crimes on the level of someone like Hideki Tojo, he was still a Japanese Imperial general and thus still complicit with many of the atrocities committed in the name of the Japanese Empire. As such, it’s understandable why many Koreans (and others) would still take offense to such a design choice made by Isayama, plus Isayama’s comment of "I respect for leading such a simple and frugal life" regarding Yoshifuru. Also, apparently the year AoT first came out as a manga was the same year a Japanese mini-series on Yoshifuru was broadcasted on Japanese television (that portrayed him as a "complex" figure, like how a lot of contemporary USA media portrays the founding fathers as moral characters). Which I wouldn't be surprised influenced Isayama’s design choice/comments on Yoshifuru.
Furthermore, Mikasa was also named after an Imperial Japanese Battleship that served during the Russo-Japan War. While it is true that the practice of naming anime/manga characters after Imperial era vehicles is a not uncommon practice (like Evangelion is chalk full of such examples, e.g.,https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/VehicularThemeNaming ) it’s at best still a questionable creative trope in Japanese creatives.
Also Erwin Smith, while significantly inspired by a Watchmen character (and a performer from a Paris Hilton music video), was also almost assuredly (I don’t recall if Isayama ever officially commented on this or not, I only know secondary sources have said Isayama stated such, but I personally have never seen the primary source from Isayama himself) partially based on Erwin Rommel, a German commander from WWII, who is popularly known for being forced to commit suicide (the actual date of which is Erwin Smith’s fictional birthday, October 14th) due to his involvement in a failed plot to assassinate Hitler, but his actual legacy and moral character is, to put it lightly, far more complicated/ethically incriminating. The pop cultural rehabilitation of Rommel is actually a relatively well-known phenomenon in historian/academic circles dubbed the “Rommel myth” (look it up to learn more, plus the Holocaust Museum’s entry on Rommel https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/erwin-rommel ). While it is relatively likely Isayama is another individual whose main knowledge of Rommel was through said myth, it is still another irresponsible/not good creative choice and gaffe made by Isayama.
And while I think that the text of the Attack on Titan series is pretty critical of issues like nationalism, militarism, and racial oppression, etc. The narrative isn’t without its issues, most notably the choice of making there be a “reason” for the Eldians oppression (an unfortunately relatively common trope to other fantasy and sci-fi media, in both anime and superhero works, like the X-Men). Which is better explained by this critic
And regardless of whether or not Isayama intentionally was drawing from Zionist conspiracy theories to create the backstory for the Eldians, even if the modern day Eldians are portrayed as the "good guys"/unjustly oppressed. Like Jacob Chapman said, it’s still giving a "reason" for the oppression, like the X-Men, but the real-world context/imagery/symbolism makes it even more irresponsible/not great.
While such gaffes may be excusable/not a breaking point/not a deciding factor to some, it isn’t unbelievable that it wouldn’t be for others. Like the series itself, the Isayama controversy isn’t a black-and-white issue either, and while I personally feel like there isn't enough evidence to declare Isayama and/or his manga as categorically far-right wing manga, at least intentionally on the creator's part.
I really think so many interpretations of the series' subtext, really require a presumption of whether or not one believes that Twitter account was Isayama's or not. Because if it was, I can totally agree that the subtext has likely been far-right sympathetic, but if it wasn't (and I personally think there isn't enough evidence to say that it is/was) I think it indicates more Isayama being really irresponsible/clumsy in his use of imagery.