jazzflower92
Pro Adventurer
- AKA
- The Girl With A Strong Opinion
Asexual. He had two near goddesses fighting over him and all we had was some implied nonsense.
Huh, no. He's been pining for Tifa.
Asexual. He had two near goddesses fighting over him and all we had was some implied nonsense.
If anything, Sephiroth is the bisexual one. He's the one who's obsessed with Cloud and is leading Cloud and Co. around everywhere. And then uses his obsession with Cloud to come back in ACC.
A lot of people got their panties in a bunch when J.K. Rowling confirmed Dumbledore to be homosexual. The backlash from bigots was to be expected, but there were also a lot of people who took issue with the fact that it "came out of nowhere" and felt like a retcon. But when you think about it, the reason behind the aforementioned reaction was based on the assumption that he wasn't and couldn't possibly have been LGBT prior to this.
I've never been into the Harry Potter fandom, so I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that the issue about the reveal about Dumbledore's sexuality was that there wasn't really much to support it in the books (except him not being in a hetero relationship, I suppose), so it just came off as Rowling fishing for diversity points after the fact without taking the risk of really making it clear in the books.
Considering how she’s done it again and again since, yeah, total queer baiting. That said, with Dumbledore there are a couple of reasons why evidence like that might not have made it to the page:
Right, I was going to say, had she stopped at Dumbledore or a little afterwards, I might've thought her genuine, but several retcons later, it was evident that she was saying whatever gave her 'credit' with her readers, which is a shame. It's no less cringey than inserting the "token black guy" in one's media in order to check off some minority quota.
"Look! Look how diverse and woke and aware we are!"
lmao foh, minorities and their experiences shouldn't be utilised as tools in order to make someone feel better about themselves or appear cooler. Nothing more jarring than catching a fauxgressive.
I don't think I understand.
Re Dumbledore, it came up when scripting one of the movies when the movie writer wanted him to talk about a lost love, and she noted his sexuality as an aside.
Then there was Hermione's casting, where JK basically said 'Hermione can be black if you want her to be'
Are there other stories I don't know about?
Additionally, there was a story about how wizards got rid of extrement before Muggle toilet existed that has gotten around recently (it's been on Pottermore for years but it just recently started to make the rounds.)
Re Dumbledore, it came up when scripting one of the movies when the movie writer wanted him to talk about a lost love, and she noted his sexuality as an aside.
At risk of further derailment, do you have a source for that?
Considering how she’s done it again and again since, yeah, total queer baiting.
The book is from the children’s perspectives, and none of the teachers’ romantic lives are mentioned except plot-relevant Snape.
It’s set in the 1990s when being an out teacher would have gotten you fired pretty much.
Regarding “normative” I am fully okay with assuming everyone is straight, monogamous, and medium height/build unless being told explicitly. I mean, that is most people, and it gets mega boring to read that over and over, and the alternative is to overwhelm your reader with more queer-and-out characters than a Gilbert & Sullivan Convention which... isn’t realistic, or else don’t bring it up and erase their queerness (and the representation) which defeats the point.
I am less okay with assuming every character is male and white so if we could make that more explicit in books we’ll probably start seeing a lot more race/gender diversity which plz can we
Some people have an issue accepting that anyone who isn't immediately announced as LGBT could be anything but straight. And that includes characters that have shown no signs of being interested in the opposite sex. It's not about whether or not they're likely to be. Some people will still assume that they simply must be, because reasons.
Fang and Vanille probably come the closest, but even then Square Enix won't come out and say it and you'll have lots of people trying to argue it's just in some people's imagination even though there's actual evidence to support the theory that they're a couple even if not conclusive.
Word of god means a big wet fart as far as I’m concerned. Make it explicit, or it’s fanfic.
I can see that point of view, but if someone feels represented by Dumbledore, should we take that away from them by not calling it 'real'representation?
Errr I wasn’t responding to you, pal. And I certainly don’t feel like engaging in further debate if you’re bringing up the Kinsey Scale as state of the art social theory.
If my uncle can watch the same movie/game and not know the character is LGBT, then it is not explicit. Word of god means a big wet fart as far as I’m concerned. Make it explicit, or it’s fanfic.
The fanfiction community does its best to redress the balance.
i think it's a problem with the history and legacy of how these characters have been portrayed, rather than a singular character in isolation. it'd be another thing if there were other characters to act as a counterbalance or contrast or just to give a wider range of representations, but often you just get the one. and if it keeps just being 'this is the gay character and they're predatory' then that's shitty. especially since these are stereotypes that people have in real life and impact the way actual people are treated (such as arguing against gay people working with children or adopting because of the notion that they are sexually predatory and thus a danger, or as the basic of 'gay panic' legal defences).Are no gay people ever sexually predatory? I mean, in real life sexuality isn't a personality trait; treating it as if it were is what leads to stereotypes in the first place. You can be gay and also a shitty person. They're two discrete circles in the Venn diagram, and sometimes they overlap. I guess the problem arises when the implication is that a character is a shitty person because they're gay/not straight, which is obviously nonsense.