But we do know the rule, at least the causality-consequence rule for it. Every character within the story's framework is operating under the belief that by changing X in the past, you get Y in the future. A direct cause-effect relationship. No mention or reference to alternate/branching timelines are mentioned, let alone believed.
Makoeyes said:Because if they did think that, their actions would make no sense within the Remake; why protect your future in the past, if whatever change happens merely creates a new timeline?
Makoeyes said:Why would Sephiroth believe he could bring about Meteor and the end by altering the past when it would merely create a new timeline he wasn't apart of?
Makoeyes said:Yes, that was when confronted with death. But he wasn't confronted with death here. He was thwarted. And he still has another plan to fallback on. The one that involves summoning Meteor the good ole' fashioned way.
...
Final victory were the stakes here. If Sephiroth had his way, doomsday would have been "today" for them.
Makoeyes said:And yeah, this is what Nomura wanted. However, I think he's more wanting us to wonder what changes or new things can happen now that we see that the story of FFVII is free to go in directions we may not necessarily predict. However, going by their respect and desire to utilize their previous work, and lack of any mention of a branching off timeline, they're not going to essentially nullify what goes forward in FFVII and beyond.
They don't discuss time travel theory at all. They just believe the world is heading for disaster and want to stop it. They probably couldn't give a shit whether doing so overwrites an existing timeline or just ensures theirs doesn't go down that same path to devastation.
They're also operating on limited knowledge and fallacious assumptions (e.g. Red mistakenly thinking the previously established happy ending is "A glimpse of tomorrow if we fail here today").
He most likely would be part of it. If he changes the course of history in the present, why wouldn't the results apply to the timeline he's occupying??
We saw those sequences very differently. I watched Sephiroth lure Avalanche into defeating an opponent whose power he immediately absorbed, then dick around with them until he got bored and left.
Nomura has already been explicit that we should look at the original and the remake as separate stories with neither overwriting the other. So we already knew going into this that they were separate timelines; we didn't know that this fact was going to be an actual plot point, with Seph acting on knowledge of the original future we were already familiar with.
And dude, why would a "lack of any mention of a branching off timeline" from the devs be problematic here? Have I fallen into an alternate universe where we are accustomed to Nomura spoiling the twists and endings of his games before release? =P
I'm not talking about the heroes, I'm talking about Sephiroth and the Arbiters of Fate.
They would be privy and aware of the consequences, given their knowledge and awareness of time travel in the place. Given the fact the Arbiters of Fate are from the future to protect the destiny that shaped them, they must know that it can be changed by direct causality.
Okay, even if that was all that occured, the potential groundwork for time disruption was laid out nonetheless. If something like Zack being allowed to live happened, that effect would directly play out. It wouldn't manifest as a mere alternate timeline or AU.
Or they simply exist to prevent subversion of the natural order. Sephiroth's defiance of returning to the Lifestream, lingering as an angry ghost who killed people with a virus, was "allowed" within the possibilities offered by the metaphysics of the setting -- but it was pointedly a perversion and unnatural. Trying to use knowledge of the future to circumvent it, while "allowable" (i.e. possible), could be the same sort of thing.
I think you're misreading me here. This (i.e. the story depicted thus far in FFVII Remake) is the alternate timeline (the original game being the point of reference for what counts as "alternate" in this context), and has been an alternate timeline from the moment Sephiroth gained knowledge of the old future.
I am saying that were Zack now alive in this parallel universe, yes, that would apply to the universe observed thus far in FFVIIR, not an additional branch off of FFVIIR's timeline.
(I suspect it may have healing properties because when one of these gold "snowflakes" lands on Biggs, he awakens.)
This is nuts and SO uneeded.
By all appearances, yes he appears to be alive. But he is bedridden and heavily wounded (specifically in a Sector 5 orphanage/school he apparently has history with).So, Biggs is alive?
By all appearances, yes he appears to be alive. But he is bedridden and heavily wounded (specifically in a Sector 5 orphanage/school he apparently has history with).
No, Jessie is dead dead by all available information. Wedge initially survived the plate fall but was also badly wounded (the party discovers Wedge, I'm not even sure if the party are aware Bigg is alive though, guess someone else found him?) but then Wedge is apparently "taken" by the Whispers, so his status by the end of the game is apparently a big ?unknown.Wedge and Jesse, too, then, I'd guess?
But that subversion is given the implication that what ever temporal distortion threatens to overwrite or destroy the "destiny" that created them. It's as if their actions are self-protective. They have to believe or operate under the assumption that time is re-writeable and able to effect change on the present. Those are the presumed stakes.
Makoeyes said:An alternate timeline that shares an Advent Children, Crisis Core, etc? I mean, okay, I suppose.
Makoeyes said:But at the same time, no one's really calling it that.
Makoeyes said:And equating it to an alternate timeline creates an inconsistency in the nature of cause-and-effect.
Sephiroth, presumably gained knowledge of some sort to effect change. That change is manifested in the present. Arbiters of Destiny arrive from the future in order to correct these distortions and protect the future that gave birth to them.
If Sephiroth's acquisition of knowledge created an alternate timeline, why is nothing else he's doing creating alternate timelines?
Makoeyes said:Why would the Arbiters be at risk and required to protect the future that created them?
Makoeyes said:Then that would mean Cloud wouldn't be Cloud anymore. He would no longer carry that Buster Sword, call himself a SOLDIER, be in pursuit of Sephiroth... That would all be gone.
This is what I innitially assumed to be the case going into the Remake. It certainly sounds like what the devs were suggesting in interviews about the Remake trying to incorporate the events of the Compilation into the OG.Unless this is to be assumed an entirely new adaptive universe that shares everything in common with the previous, save for the core work, FFVII.
If they weren't there, I wouldn't no. But they are and the fact that the team saw glimpses of AC, which wouldnt have happened yet and some of the OG game(?) makes me lean on the side that it is an alternate timeline or time travel or something. I haven't seen all the spoilers but doesn't sephiroth essentially say hes from the future or something? So alternate timeline malarkey seems to be the only thing that makes sense in this regard. I could be wrong though.I mean, it's weird. Even without the Whispers, would this game be considered an alternate timeline? There are characters here that dont appear in the original, conversations go differently, some differences.
But yeah if you are talking about the Whispers part, we have no idea.
At this point everything is speculation. No one is wrong or right until proven by part 2.So is the remake set in an alternate timeline or is that purely speculation at this point?
There are characters that do not appear in the original because it is a remake. Conversations are different because it is a remake. This is all well in the bounds of being a remake.I mean, it's weird. Even without the Whispers, would this game be considered an alternate timeline? There are characters here that dont appear in the original, conversations go differently, some differences.
But yeah if you are talking about the Whispers part, we have no idea.
Nomura said just the opposite recently:I always thought the remake was to replace the original game, expand upon it.
Surely if the group is going to change the events of original as they think it's a bad end, like a lot of people are speculating, then it will overwrite the original? Unless the remake is in an alternate timeline, which of course we wont find out for a few years. Damn it.Nomura said just the opposite recently:
https://twinfinite.net/2020/03/final-fantasy-vii-remake-wont-overwrite-original/
https://www.famitsu.com/news/202003/02193727.html
『FFVII リメイク』が出てもオリジナルの『FFVII』が上書きされるわけではありません。オリジナルがあくまで原点であり、今回はオリジナルあってこその新しい『FFVII』であると捉えていただければと思います。
"The release of 'FFVII Remake' does not overwrite the original 'FFVII.' The original is the origin, and I hope you'll now think of this new 'FFVII' as separate from the original."
I don’t think Sephiroth needs to reverse the damage cause by Meteor impacting though. In the OG Meteor was implied to be big to cause mass extinction (like the dinosaur meteor) and cause a wound big enough for the Lifestream to converge in one spot, but he never intended it to be so big/damaging, the planet as a celestial body would be destroyed. Since he wants to absorb/control The Lifestream not obliterate it.
Nomura said just the opposite recently:
https://twinfinite.net/2020/03/final-fantasy-vii-remake-wont-overwrite-original/
https://www.famitsu.com/news/202003/02193727.html
『FFVII リメイク』が出てもオリジナルの『FFVII』が上書きされるわけではありません。オリジナルがあくまで原点であり、今回はオリジナルあってこその新しい『FFVII』であると捉えていただければと思います。
"The release of 'FFVII Remake' does not overwrite the original 'FFVII.' The original is the origin, and I hope you'll now think of this new 'FFVII' as separate from the original."