Harry Potter and the Chitter of Chatting

[Dawnbreaker]

The purest form of love creates a breeding ground for the deepest form of hate.

 

[Joker]

Just because she doesn't believe in love, doesn't mean she's naive. So all that is a bit uncalled for, don't you think?

Unless we can call Dacon naive, anyway

 

[Tifaeria]

I don't really get how cowgirl could be seen as a degrading position to women. By placing her on the top it allows her more freedom of movement and gives her more ability to set the pace of the sex, which is pretty much of the reverse of the way it usually goes in missionary in my experience. Unless the idea of a woman asserting her sexuality is seen as degrading I guess, it seems to me like it's actually the most empowering position for a woman.

Though yeah, if the guy is lazy and doesn't do anything, then it'd be pretty crap. But seriously, anyone who just sits there would be a crap sex partner in any case

doesn't hurt that it also hits the G-spot better than missionary as well

True, but I'm more about positions that would be nice for both partners. My problem is that it can't be onesided (love and workwise), and it looks onesided in the positions that I object to. But that's just me. You guys say differently and I respect that.

By nature, guys have to do more of the physical stuff during sex, if not almost all. Cowgirl gets a lot of acclaim because the guy gets to lay back, and the girl is in control of depth, speed, etc. Almost every other position the guy has to do the work and controls the pace.

I expect sex to be equal in all aspects. I just don't like it when they are just laying down. How about hugging or helping a girl out? Sitting in an upright position?

Like, literally uncomfortable, as in physically? Or like mentally?

Mentally? Not really. Physically yes. I don't like how the woman is positioned (or man, but I dunno anything about gay sex), and imo, if there is a mirror in front of her, then I might change my mind because she is also getting pleasure in the site of the position (like she's just facing down, and the guy is looking at her, she's got nothing to look at! If there is a mirror, they both end up satisfied.)

?

Like I don't mind 69 cause both partners are with each other at the same time. Oral, it just looks selfish to me, especially if the other person doesn't recuperate after. But this varies to me depending on the person.

Aaaand sorry for the late reply! I told you I suck at this. And if you expect me to explain more, I'll probably fail hard at that.

 

[Cat Rage Room]

Just because she doesn't believe in love, doesn't mean she's naive. So all that is a bit uncalled for, don't you think?

It's a naive statement, that's for sure. Call it like we see it.

 

[Carlos]

The purest form of love creates a breeding ground for the deepest form of hate.

this was another deep moment brought to you by Dawn of love.

 

[Ⓐaron]

True, but I'm more about positions that would be nice for both partners. My problem is that it can't be onesided (love and workwise), and it looks onesided in the positions that I object to. But that's just me. You guys say differently and I respect that.

I expect sex to be equal in all aspects. I just don't like it when they are just laying down. How about hugging or helping a girl out? Sitting in an upright position?

Mentally? Not really. Physically yes. I don't like how the woman is positioned (or man, but I dunno anything about gay sex), and imo, if there is a mirror in front of her, then I might change my mind because she is also getting pleasure in the site of the position (like she's just facing down, and the guy is looking at her, she's got nothing to look at! If there is a mirror, they both end up satisfied.)

Like I don't mind 69 cause both partners are with each other at the same time. Oral, it just looks selfish to me, especially if the other person doesn't recuperate after. But this varies to me depending on the person.

Aaaand sorry for the late reply! I told you I suck at this. And if you expect me to explain more, I'll probably fail hard at that.

Well like I said, any guy who just lays back and doesn't do anything in cowgirl position is... not much of a sex partner

and mirrors make every position better

 

[crack]

Actually, I thought lots of people didn't believe true love existed.

 

[Makoeyes987]

I'm not naive. No, if I was naive I'd be saying that, "I fell in love with someone!" even though it was just a day.

Statistically speaking, you'll come around. You're human. The odds are stacked against you, to be honest. OPEN YOUR HEART.

 

[Carlos]

and mirrors make every position better

ceiling mirror forthewin

 

[Alessa Gillespie]

I expect sex to be equal in all aspects. I just don't like it when they are just laying down. How about hugging or helping a girl out? Sitting in an upright position?

Spoiler: TMI alert!

When my boyfriend and I have sex in teh cowgirl position, he also moves along with my rhythm so we can both have the most enjoyable experience.

My true love exists. Her name is Audball.

 

[Joker]

It's a naive statement, that's for sure. Call it like we see it.

I'd disagree. She could be jaded, or just plain not believe in it.

Not that it matters, ultimately, but while I disagree with her position very, VERY much, it's no reason to call her judgment into question. That's all.

 

[Dawnbreaker]

this was another deep moment brought to you by Dawn of love.

Hey, I'm normally pro-love. I just happen to think the statement's true.

Also, I find I don't like 69. I find I rather not be so distracted when I'm either trying to pleasure someone or receiving said pleasure. I guess some girls can't multi-task. xD

 

[Carlos]

Spoiler: TMI alert!

When my boyfriend and I have sex in teh cowgirl position, he also moves along with my rhythm so we can both have the most enjoyable experience.

proof plx

 

[crack]

I know soul mates exist too. :sniff:

 

[crack]

Statistically speaking, you'll come around. You're human. The odds are stacked against you, to be honest. OPEN YOUR HEART.

I thought teenagers were the most prone to 'true love,' crap.

 

[Alessa Gillespie]

BUT NOT SOUL TWINS. Fucking hippie bullshit.

 

[Makoeyes987]

I thought teenagers were the most prone to 'true love,' crap.

That was back when WE were kids. Sadly the environment of teens is a much more jaded, darker place than when I was a one.

You know, before there were ways to clearly see just how fucked up people were en mass

Thank you internet!

 

[Cat Rage Room]

stuff

Basically, looking at this post, makes it seem you think about the minutiae too much!

"WHOA WHOA. IF WE HAVE SEX FOR 23 MINUTES WE HAVE TO BE EQUALLY PLEASURED AT THE SAME TIME FOR 23 OF THOSE MINUTES"

"HEY. NO GETTING AROUSED YET. *pulls out stopwatch* ON MY MARK..."

(not mocking, just poking fun!)

Sex isn't about entirely equal feelings at the same time. Sex is about two people having fun and having sex, and both being satisfied at the end. Every moment of it doesn't have to be entirely equal, and as a guy, I'll speak for all guys to say that we could really care less about it. F

or example, giving a girl oral isn't giving me the EXACT AMOUNT OF PHYSICAL PLEASURE as she's getting, but she's happy, so it's all cool with me. Expecting an equal turnout during every second of the journey instead of the destination is just putting too much time and effort, instead of actually having sex. It should be an equal effort, but some onesidedness isn't bad either!

In fact, giving pleasure to you partner and knowing you're not getting the exact same amount at that time feels good in itself.

 

[A]

I know soul mates exist too. :sniff:

Soul mates do not exist. It's a simple term created by man kind.

 

[Dawnbreaker]

Yeah, I believe in soulmates too, but not the same soul/ twin soul crap. I just happen to find that soulmates mean that you have a lot in common, like pair of soles have the commonality of belonging to the same pair of shoes. But the same/twin stuff just strikes me as pretentious, because it makes it sound like you have to be EXACTLY THE SAME. You shouldn't have to be completely the same to be so very connected. I think some people go overboard and romanticize it all.

 

[Cat Rage Room]

Soul mates do not exist. It's a simple term created by man kind.

Soul mates sounds mystical, sure, but what about couples that have been happy together for decades and still are together through thick and thin, even when they could have been left each other and probably would have been easier to do so? Is that just a long term attraction? Naw, son, that's love.

 

[Alessa Gillespie]

Soul mates do not exist. It's a simple term created by man kind.

In the romantic sense I gotta agree, but I already said this elsewhere.

 

[Joker]

This thread has become very depressing of a sudden

 

[A]

That was back when WE were kids. Sadly the environment of teens is a much more jaded, darker place than when I was a one.

I highly disagree. If you were a teenager now, you'd be appalled by how many people profess their love for one another so quickly. Three dates, and BAM. They confess they're love, they're doing it, and the next thing you know she's knocked up with a boyfriend that ran off.

 

[A]

Soul mates sounds mystical, sure, but what about couples that have been happy together for decades and still are together through thick and thin, even when they could have been left each other and probably would have been easier to do so? Is that just a long term attraction? Naw, son, that's love.

I'm a girl.

And I'd say that just proves how strong the two are to stick to each other and fight off the bad crap that happens along the way.