Ⓐaron
Factiō Rēpūblicāna dēlenda est.
- AKA
- The Man, V
Basically, looking at this post, makes it seem you think about the minutiae too much!
"WHOA WHOA. IF WE HAVE SEX FOR 23 MINUTES WE HAVE TO BE EQUALLY PLEASURED AT THE SAME TIME FOR 23 OF THOSE MINUTES"
"HEY. NO GETTING AROUSED YET. *pulls out stopwatch* ON MY MARK..."
(not mocking, just poking fun!)
Sex isn't about entirely equal feelings at the same time. Sex is about two people having fun and having sex, and both being satisfied at the end. Every moment of it doesn't have to be entirely equal, and as a guy, I'll speak for all guys to say that we could really care less about it. F
or example, giving a girl oral isn't giving me the EXACT AMOUNT OF PHYSICAL PLEASURE as she's getting, but she's happy, so it's all cool with me. Expecting an equal turnout during every second of the journey instead of the destination is just putting too much time and effort, instead of actually having sex. It should be an equal effort, but some onesidedness isn't bad either!
In fact, giving pleasure to you partner and knowing you're not getting the exact same amount at that time feels good in itself.
I'll agree with this. I'll also add that this is also the main reason many people find light bondage appealing - being tied up and not having to focus on pleasuring one's partner, simply on receiving pleasure, then having the roles reversed and focusing on giving pleasure instead of receiving it, is a nice switch from the usual sex acts where both partners are focused much more on pleasuring the other.
This thread is also making me really goddamn lonely