There was a version of the secret movie even in the original release, not just in final mix. The final mix version is extended. When KH1 was being made they didn't know they'd get a sequel, but its success quickly led to approval for one. My point is that they've done these secret movies without surefire plans before. Heck, Crisis Core's secret ending was supposed to be a nudge to square about a remake, but that didn't come to fruition for years afterwards.
Yes, that's definitely the original, shorter KH secret movie. The final mix one is specifically labeled "Another Side, Another Story" which was more solidified and based on their plans for continued games in the series. But yes, they do make secret teaser movies/trailers on concepts not necessarily guaranteed or fleshed out. And I can see that element within the DC one, however I was focusing more on it's connection (or rather implied connection) to it's following work, CC. Because it was there and in development.
Let me try to clear up my point. I don't think that scene was made to tease him appearing in remake. I don't think they knew cosplaying Gackt was gonna time travel into the past when they filmed that. It's why I keep bringing up the KH secret movie, because those are similar in intent. It's a concept more than a fully fledged idea. The concept being that there is more to be done with this character yet. Me tying it in to Remake's time shenanigans is my way of rationalizing how it could be relevant to the plot in a way that's at least consistent with what's going on. Despite what you keep insisting, I really doubt the devs forgot about this scene or what they said about it. It comes up basically every time Genesis gets a detailed character profile. Heck, that version of Fenesis even snuck his way onto that cool Dirge promo art, so I have a lot of reason to think they considered the whole thing important. Basically, if the do bring in Genesis again, which I think they will, it would probably be the post-Dirge version even though that's not really the most logically sound or necessary way to do it.
Okay, fair enough. That makes more sense, although I don't think Genesis's use needs to necessarily hinge on that particular secret movie trailer or anything. But they
can still draw from it conceptually and/or thematically.
For instance, my example with actually having
him show up in the present, in person in Midgar. Although I'm not really a fan of this, there actually is a way to make it work canonically, thematically and meaningfully. By having him be an optional boss
and unique event that's encountered either during the raid on Midgar OR, (and I literally just thought of this) a unique episode/scenario that takes place during the evacuation of Midgar. If they were gonna use Genesis in an extended capacity, this would be the best spot. The part of FFVII shown during the DC opening.
We already know from that opening and the 10th Anniversary Ultimania, that Vincent and Yuffie helped evacuate civilians shortly before Meteorfall, so... What if during that whole affair Vincent (and maybe Yuffie or just...
whoever) discovered a path deep beneath Midgar that led to a hidden area that looked suspiciously like the cave from the secret movie? And because of their intrusion, the group encounters "G" in his DC appearance, and scrap with him, because he at first believes they're the source of the cries of the planet he's heard in his sleep? Afterwards G stops, recognizes their strength & purpose, and ominously warns them that if they dig too deep within Midgar, they'll find a veritable nest of "monsters." From there he assists them in their fight by giving them say.... The Minerva summon materia which he
feels wants to help them, and resolves to sleep some more. Because he must still must play the role of the "Prisoner" for a little while longer before he can finish his atonement and move to the next act of his role to helping the Planet. An allusion to him awakening 3 years later. This would be fleshed out to whatever role they had in mind for him in DC's future and would be the tie-in to what was implied there so it no longer is mysterious. We'd know thanks to the chance encounter that occured right before Meteorfall. And it'd explain why he didn't wake up; he actually did but because of feeling it wasn't his time and the Planet was not ready for him, he remained the "Prisoner" in LOVELESS's story, and resolved to wait a bit longer to atone.
Now, that was just off the top of my head but I think it shows there's far more space for Genesis to actually show up and have it make sense in the present versus trying to make the secret movie directly connect via time travel. There's just way more room for it, and it definitely utilizes him in a meaningful way, while showing how he'd relate to that secret movie too.
I personally think you're underestimating how well these devs know their work and how careful they were to tie it all together. Like, yeah, if the Re- series wraps up with no Gackt then I was wrong, so be it. I just think you're too hasty in assuming that the devs aren't gonna play with all the toys the made for themselves. Leslie Kyle and Kyrie are both much more obscure than Genesis, and they got roles in remake (granted, more nice clean logical roles than what I'm proposing lol).
My issue was that, I didn't think they would place that much importance on that singular movie to the point they'd feel the need to
directly connect it to the Remake. It's not that Genesis is unimportant or he's forgotten about. I just think the writers, if they were going to try to nod to it, would do it in a way that's more subtle. They'd link to it within the confines of the setting, not treat it as this huge thing that demands an answer. I've always said I think Genesis will get some acknowledgement, just not something outsized or distracting to the main theme/story.
Yeah so it's just a coincidence that same phrasing was used with this one character who just so happened to be relevant in both instances. Sure. Because Weiss' VR battle is such a big climactic moment lol.
I mean, I'm not trying to be a smartass or flippant but yes. I really do think it's a coincidence. It's a very common expression, especially in fiction. Now, I do sorta get how one can make the connection given Weiss's presence and connection to Genesis but... I don't think that was the intention. Especially since there's no Genesis mention in Intermission. Let me reiterate that I'm not saying Genesis will never be acknowledged or appear, I just don't think it's connected there.
You act like everyone is insane for not agreeing with you about things and functionality screaming your beliefs over everyone else's to the point where discussing things around here is a pain and people don't bother. This whole excerize was to see how long you'd keep going, because at least one person needs to try to out stubborn you. I know I'm not alone in getting frustrated when talking to you, though yeah I definitely lost my temper last night.
I can be flippant while I have fun in debates over this, but I'm not insulting you or anyone. I like to poke fun at the topic and get into it, but that's just how I am. There's no malice and I certainly am not trying to insult someone's intelligence over a video game topic here. I simply get colorful in my language and in terms of stubbornness, well. I enjoy posting, what can I say? I thrive off this. I can tell you were taking my attitude in a way I didn't intend so I got more serious and composed in my replies given the situation, so I'm sorry for rubbing you wrong with my replies. It was only in fun.
It's your arrogant attitude. I don't think you're coming off that way on purpose but you do. I know Round is trolling most of the time but I'm friggin not, but you insist I must be. It's irritating. Like, you say it's not in reference to me but it really came off that way.
No I didn't think you were trolling, and that's my mistake for not making my point there clear. I was speaking generally about those who do try to say Genesis is a hero and think he's wholly good or something. I'm not trying to come off arrogant at all, it's just when I have an opinion or position, I can be frank with it.
There's no indication Shinra was involved. You're just adding that to support your argument. Yes they had Weiss and Nero capture him at the end of CC, but that was after his battle with Zack and he was exhausted. By all accounts, he walked out of Deepground shortly after and disappeared, and Shinra covered up his existence.
Nobody captured him, he left on his own and went into a self imposed isolation. Shinra covered him up out of embarrassment I guess.
So, the G Reports are written by an unidentified Shinra associate who seemingly assisted the design/construction/etc of early Midgar per G Report 3 ("being one of the few who was involved in their construction, I know all too well of the vast caverns that sprawl deep beneath our city's
streets"). Furthermore, Genesis was taken into custody by Nero and Weiss. Given that the writers stated in the
CC Ultimania Scenario Q&A that when Genesis was asked to assist Nero and Weiss in their rebellion he "rejects it and decides to have himself sealed in the water-filled chamber below Midgar," I think you can see why I'd believe Shinra was responsible or at least a participant in his sealing.
Nero and Weiss captured Genesis. He's below Shinra's capital city. However, there's another piece of evidence... In FFVII-R Hojo
specifically makes reference to utilizing members of SOLDIER as potential mating candidates for Aerith,
"including S and G types."
Now...There is a
very small number of living G type SOLDIERs during the time of FFVII. For clarification, a G-Type SOLDIER is:
In fact, the number is so small, there's actually one. Angeal is dead. Hollander is dead. There's only one G-Type SOLDIER Hojo could
possibly be referring to in this scene.
Genesis.
Hojo clearly has knowledge and access to Genesis. He put him forth as a possible SOLDIER candidate for Aerith's...breeding. Clearly implying Genesis is in their custody.
Between all of that information, I don't know why Genesis wouldn't be assumed under the watch and sealing of Shinra. He's accessible to Hojo and the Science Department, G's awareness permeates through certain pockets of Shinra,
and he was captured by two of the strongest Tsviets of Deepground. Now, Genesis may have
let himself be sealed away by putting forth no resistance, but he's clearly in their custody. If anything, the FFVII Remake confirmed it with certainty.
Why do the G Reports claim Zack was sent on a mission to subdue him while in reality Zack was on the run when that happened?
The report doesn't list Zack by name. And technically speaking, Zack's last major mission as a SOLDIER 1-C
before the fated Nibelheim Incident, was the subjugation of Genesis. Before Zack's last record would list him as being KIA, that would have been one of his last major misssions given the entire Nibelheim Incident would be expunged from the record. G-Report 2 either refers to Zack or... The unidentified "SOLDIER 1-Cs" who picked up Genesis in Banora.
Still, the translation definitely colored your opinion, so the clarification was necessary.
Well, it's definitely informative because yeah. That's a new perspective on it I hadn't heard before.
No, it's not clear she "rebuked" him. Everyone I talked to about this in my exhausted stuppor yesterday made it seem like the exact opposite happened. He was given a chance to be the hero he wanted to be, and now serves the planet. That's what happened in that scene.
For clarification, we're talking about the scene where Genesis meets Minerva, right?
Because at 0:24, Minerva goes from looking at Genesis to closing and averting her eyes from him. That's a reproachful expression; turning one's gaze
away from someone, as if not wanting to look at them. It conveys disappointment or disapproval in some form. It's why Genesis looks surprised and dismayed at 0:32 and then finally is seemingly pushed away into the darkness before poofing into Lifestream and back into the living world.
That is why I say she "rebuked" him. He was cured and given a second chance, but clearly Minerva found
something disappointing.