Is there any reason why Rinko wasn't? She got some recognition from Pacific Rim so I imagine she would have been.... Star-ish enough almost?
I guess starrish enough almost isn't quite box office gold, though. To be perfectly honest, I had to look up who she was, as I wasn't familiar with her name, nor did I see Pacific Rim.
It's exactly
JUST that.
Now I've gotta get into detail, because while we've touched on the subject all over the thread, I don't think that it's been laid out in detail in one big poast. so....–
Scarlett's got her role as Black Widow in
Iron-Man 2,
Avengers, &
Cap 2 that put her in the spotlight as the single strong and main female in the MCU. Then she had that Indy film
Under the Skin with just her presence that (even if not financially great was
overwhelming loved by basically everyone that saw it). That success of sorts got her in
Lucy, which in turn means that she's proven as a star actress to be singularly reliably bankable enough to be the lead for
Ghost in the Shell. That presence is what they count on to be able to pre-sell the film for the VFX budget that the film needs (not to mention that most of those roles of hers also work to show that she can nail this role specifically).
On top of that, she has to be internationally bankable as a headliner which takes an already relatively thin list and narrows it down even more. (And, not to nitpick, but if they DID do a GitS film with Rinko Kikuchi, I think that she'd be better off doing the dialogue in Japanese rather than English).
Now, to refresh everyone, the videos that Gabe & I posted pretty much outline ALL of this stuff – both in general (with Adi Shankar) and in specific (with Max Landis). It goes over all the mechanics really thoroughly from two people who know the industry inside and out. I honestly can't recommend watching them enough to get a good handle on this.
The tl;dr from the whole thing is that Scarlett Johansson was cast for her star power and bankability to be able to fund the film. This wasn't a role in a pre-funded film that would've been available to a minority actress who was passed over. The reason that there aren't minority stars that HAVE that star power who could've been cast is a by-product of white-washing or not making roles for minorities in Hollywood films that are already being bankrolled by big studios.
This is why when
I did a write-up (which admittedly has some errors in it) before Max Landis' video was made, I specifically called it out as something OTHER than white-washing, because I want to make sure that people recognize the fundamental differences, even if they're part of an interconnected cycle – if you're going to criticize it, you need to understand it.
As a direct comparison (despite it eventually being a terrible film)
The Last Airbender was fully funded by Nickelodeon and M. Night's own production company, so while they
COULD HAVE AND SHOULD HAVE cast minority actors for their respective roles in the film, they didn't. Similar things happened with
Pan and the role of Tigerlily. THAT is white-washing, because it's eliminating existing roles from minorities who could use them to get exposure that would eventually give us minority stars who could be cast as a front-liner to be able to independently fund films like
Ghost in the Shell.
THIS is just the second step down that broken system, where the film is essentially always required to be, "Ghost in the Shell <with big star actress>" and then it's up to them to take that as a given and make up for it after the fact. Part of which I feel is something like casting Beat Takeshi whose star power doesn't mean anything outside of Japan, but this gives SOME minorities a chance at becoming bigger stars with the other roles, rather than filling out the rest of the cast with other big name celebs.
X