I am CC's friend, but I voted for simply because I thought it looked best. I've been in the mood for red in graphics lately and it is in fact *red* xD. And just so you know she didn't ask me too if that helps. (:tangerine said:You're actually the only person on the list of people who voted for her that isn't her friend and I checked this beforehand, so none of this was aimed at you.
Well, why isn't there some board of qualified judges instead of board members who don't know enough about this stuff to judge the technical best?
Most people who actively post here are her friend, because they post here as well. And note that her friends have also voted for others as well. Comparing her friend count here to the rest of you, she has a lot more. Unless it can be proven that she personally asked one of us to vote for her, I doubt she would have asked people to vote for her.Legretta: You're actually the only person on the list of people who voted for her that isn't her friend and I checked this beforehand, so none of this was aimed at you.
Why does it matter whether or whether not I didn't know you guys could check how people voted? I already said in the voting thread that I voted for Celes Chere. And by advanced, I mean more experienced. I don't quite think she's as experienced as the rest of you, but like I said, it looked the most appealing to me. I don't think you can accuse someone of cheating and stating she should be disqualified when you haven't gotten any proof of her actually asking anyone to vote for her. But if she did ask others personally besides me (and there's actual proof of it besides claims), then I do agree on having to disqualify her. Otherwise, no.Considering she also didn't know we could check how people voted until earlier today, I think this speaks for itself.
She meant to originally vote for FISH, but clicked the wrong one. I think she's entitled to make mistakes.She did attempt to cheat once before by voting for herself, likely not knowing that we could see how everyone voted.
That sounds like a good idea. The judges could be maybe 3 or so members that qualify as advanced tag/sig makers as the permanent one and then so people can take turns judging, whoever won the last sig of the week discussion could help for the next week.cherry said:I'm actually all for this idea. IMO, the judges should be people who enter the competition as well as several experienced members.
^Props
That judging shit sounds like way too much work, and its only been this sotw where the voting may look like foul play, so I say we just keep it as it is, how its always been and let that shit roll.
Lestat said:even picasso got credit for his ugly ass paintings.
I smell some serious bullshit here.
She did attempt to cheat once before by voting for herself, likely not knowing that we could see how everyone voted.
Seriously. If the butthurt, drama shit and accusations don't stop, we'll just have to pull the plug. That's inappropriate and uncalled for. For fuck's sake, keep the drama and crap out of here, please. If you didn't win or the person you wanted didn't win, there's always next time. Quit complaining over an e-poll.
Don't worry hun, that's just your upper lip. =)