Kind of.
The argument stemmed from the frustration that fandom believes that anything associated with Aerith and/or Tifa is automatically romantic.
The best examples of these are the very loose connections between characters in AU games (or games outside of the continuity). I made the example of Dissidia that things that should not be taken in romantic context, was. There are a great deal of continuity nods within Cloud's story, and I made the argument that Holy was one of them.
I guess I should have phrased it better so that it was obvious that some people didn't think his crystal was materia, but the general idea is that a lot of people believe that the materia Cloud has his holy (for some from freaking obvious reasons).
And several people point out that this reeks of being a 'just so' story. For freaking obvious reasons.
Firion, OK, Cecil, and Bartz and Squall, to name 5.
And then we got into the materia fight, with people trying to degrade Holy's role in the story and the symbolism in the game (COME AT ME) to prove that there is no possible reason Dissidia would ever want to put holy in there and it never crossed their minds. Or something.
There's a reason SE might do it. I just don't think they DID.
The whole issue is kind of ironic actually. Because the whole reason it was brought up was to explain that these continuity nods don't equal romance. Which everyone agrees with. We just don't agree on the lesser details of what are the continuity nods.
Well, when CORNELIA CASTLE is worth pointing out as a nod but not what crystals are a nod to, I'm'a err on the side of 'not really that much of a nod'
EDIT
Semantics.
It summoned holy.
If folks can get pissed when Squall is called Leon, I can bitch when they call Materia by the spells they cast.
They're the black and white materia. They are not Meteor and Holy. They cast Meteor and Holy, but they are not the same thing.
A pistol is not a bullet.
i see no flat side to the circle idg what you are talking about
Flattened or Oblate, not 'flat.' Meaning off circular due to a wider curvature arc.
Of course, this discussion reminds me that the big thing in the logo is un-missing the rocky bits of Meteor.
That version of the logo is closer to 'round' yes. The version Zee posted had a more deformed circle.
it could be the black materia, since it's really fucking huge
also ARTISTIC LICENSE HAS DONE MANY THINGS FOR THIS GAME SUCH AS GIVEN AERITH AND SEPHIROTH PERFECTLY SPIKED BANGS. A GIANT MATERIA DOES NOT SEEM THAT IRRATIONAL
Nor does space Ejecta. And space Ejecta or an object like the moon is a lot more parsimonious than MegaMateria.
I mean, we're going with made up shit either way. Might as well go with the one that doesn't require massive inflation of an object or two distinct vops.