Lord Noctis
Harbinger of Darkness
- AKA
- Caius Ballad
fanfiction.net. For some reason it won't let me update my stories, and despite en email sent to their support staff explaining the situation over a week ago, it has not been fixed. Am furious.
if you are seriously thinking you won't have do deal with anything anymore because some magical dude in the sky is gonna take you away from it all, you may as well kill yourself and save the rest of us the trouble.
aside from my less than stellar view of Christianity, do you actually think that within your lifetime the rapture will occur and you are anticipating it or do you think that it'll happen when it happens.Well I believe in the Rapture and God. So I might as well shoot myself now.
I think they put the hentai up high so's the kiddies couldn't grab it. :3I THOUGHT GAMETRADERS OWNERS HAD GOOD TASTE IN ANIME ;-; (There was like a shelf of DBZ at the bottom though, IT SHOULD BE THE OTHER WAY AROUND THEY SHOULD BE DISPLAYING THE DBZ STUFF PROUDLY AND HIDING THE HENTAI AT THE BOTTOM SHELF LIKE THEY SHOULD RIGHTFULLY BE ASHAMED OF)
No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.
i for one an looking forward to rapture because i have always wanted to mod my dna to shoot lightening boltsI'm looking forward to the Rapture but more because it'll mean we all make our hero teams to fight the zombies we have been preparing for with video games.
http://tinysprout.tumblr.com/post/3713649989/scott-adams-dilbert-deleted-post
dilberts author thinks its unfair women get all those rights. those uppity trollops.
I actually lold. What a bawwwwfest.
'cause it's so hard being a white male in today's society amirite
Dilbert's blog said:http://www.dilbert.com/blog/ sauce
Regular readers of my blog know that the goal of my writing is to be interesting and nothing else. I'm not trying to change anyone's opinion, largely because I don't believe humans can be influenced by exposure to better arguments, even if I had some. But I do think people benefit by exposure to ideas that are different from whatever they are hearing, even when the ideas are worse. That's my niche: something different. That approach springs from my observation that brains are like investment portfolios, where diversification is generally a good strategy. I'm not trying to move you to my point of view; I'm trying to add diversity to your portfolio of thoughts. In the short term, I hope it's stimulating enough to be entertaining. Long term, the best ideas probably come from people who have the broadest exposure to different views.
Contrast my style of blogging to the most common styles, which include advocacy for some interest group or another, punditry, advice, and information. Now imagine moving my writing from the context of this blog to the context of an advocacy blog. You can see the problem. Men thought I was attacking men, and women thought I was attacking women. The message changed when the context changed. I saw that developing, so I took down the post.
Yes, I do know that nothing can be deleted from the Internet. Yes, I knew that taking down the post would increase curiosity about it. This isn't my first rodeo. It's not even the first time I've taken down a post and others reposted it. But I didn't anticipate how much the context would change when it got reposted on Feminist websites and Men's Rights sites. I should have.
...
But I didn't take down the piece just because I thought doing so would be funny, or because I wanted attention. Those were bonuses. The main reason is that when a lot of drive-by readers saw the piece, and they didn't know the context of this blog, it changed the message of the post to something unintended. As a writer, unintended messages are unbearable.
...
But perhaps I can summarize my viewpoint so you can understand why I'm such a misogynist asshole douche bag. Here's my view in brief:
You can't expect to have a rational discussion on any topic that has an emotional charge. Emotion pushes out reason. That is true for all humans, including children, men, women, and people in every range of mental ability. The path of least resistance is to walk away from that sort of fight. Men generally prefer the path of least resistance. The exception is when men irrationally debate with other men. That's a type of sport. No one expects opinions to be changed as a result.
Are women more emotional than men? I'm not sure how you measure that sort of thing. On the emotional scoreboard, does one person's anger equal another person's excitement? All I know for sure is that the Men's Rights group I poked with a stick has some irritable dudes.
To the best of my knowledge, no one who understood the original post and its context was offended by it. But to the women who were offended by their own or someone else's interpretation of what I wrote, I apologize. To the men who were offended by my mocking of Men's Rights, you're still a big bunch of pussies. But your criticisms of the legal system are worthy of attention. Even Feminists agree on that point.
Actually, it was a social experiment!Apparently the post was 'taken out of context'.
unfunny business said:I want to rage but this tweet from James Urbaniak made me happy: "Shorter Scott Adams: I deleted my post on the emotional superiority of men because I couldn't handle the criticsm."
Actually, it was a social experiment!