I think it makes sense for where the next installment its set in the present. It could be interesting considering that George Washington had a piece of eden. I just want a female assassin already.
Terry Bogard said:I don't see that happening if it takes place during the American revolution.
How many open world games take place in japan? Especially western games. The only games I can think of are the Yakuza series and those are hardly open world like AC games are.
Even if the Renaissance was pretty random, the time period was interesting it had so much potential and they siphoned out that potential really well, but the American Revolution?
I just can't see it being as free as the other games. Could you get away with running on the rooftops in the colonies, and not shoot everyone you see? That's what really bothers me
There are a lot of freaking games that take place in Japan or if not in Japan, than in very Japan-inspired locales. Why would only open world ones count?
Japan has only ever really been depicted superficially. The amount of detail and life that an Assassins Creed game brings to these time periods would be more than welcome in that kind of setting.
But that's my point. The amount of detail and life that an Assassin's Creed game brings would be more than welcome in just about any setting. Even Open world games set in America haven't really given any more depth than any other sort of game. GTA has come the closest I suppose but that's decidedly one-sided. Also you drive a tank through Times Square.
Sure it was, all I was saying with my first comment was that Japan and America were two equally predictable choices. But my overall point is that with the effort and detail put into an Assassin's Creed game, they seriously cannot pick a wrong setting.
I can see that being relevant for outside of the Animus exploration, like subject 16's Truth videos, but how they would actually make the assassin your controlling get the bigger picture doesn't seem likely, even Ezio and Altair who had seen a lot of mind blowing things still didn't full grasp everything.Given the series Knights Templar slant, there is a metric ton of Free Mason/Knights Templar crap going on in the American Revolution history. In fact it's the only other period that comes to my mind besides the Crusades when thinking about the Knights Templar.
The problem I have with it mostly is that it's a war era, and you can't really avoid a bunch of troops shooting you down at once, the guns in the revolution were much better than the ones form the Renaissance too...I dunno...why not? The guns of the period weren't really much better than the ones the guards have in Revelations. And buildings still had rooftops, right?
Also for all we know the game could easily move back and forth between the colonies and England. Given that Washington has the apple, you're likely going to be on the British side.
Gotta remember that most of these colonies were granted full independence and the such. That's probably the least Templar thing there is. Could be swung the other way where Assassin's control the colonies as a means of protection from the Templars. Independence was given when such places could fight the Templars back on their own.Evil King controlling the colonies wouldn't be Templars? The American Revolution is generally something seen as positive and incentive for other revolutions(like the french) so I think that Templar's would be the British, Queen Elizabeth had the apple at some point too, maybe Americans(Assassins) stole it from the British?
Gotta remember that most of these colonies were granted full independence and the such. That's probably the least Templar thing there is. Could be swung the other way where Assassin's control the colonies as a means of protection from the Templars. Independence was given when such places could fight the Templars back on their own.
The Templars aren't about handing power back to the people. Not at all.
he problem I have with it mostly is that it's a war era, and you can't really avoid a bunch of troops shooting you down at once, the guns in the revolution were much better than the ones form the Renaissance too...
Evil King controlling the colonies wouldn't be Templars? The American Revolution is generally something seen as positive and incentive for other revolutions(like the french) so I think that Templar's would be the British, Queen Elizabeth had the apple at some point too, maybe Americans(Assassins) stole it from the British?
Wikipedia said:One theory of the origins of Freemasonry claims direct descent from the historical Knights Templar through its final fourteenth-century members who took refuge in Scotland, or other countries where the Templar suppression was not enforced. This theory is usually deprecated on grounds of lack of evidence, by both Masonic authorities[82] and historians.[83]
That would be pretty intense thenGeorge Washington and most of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were Free Masons. Free Masons have the order of the Knights Templar. Masons deny that it's linked to the medieval Templars, but that seems ripe for Ubisoft's picking if you ask me.
When taxes like the stamp act and quartering act came into play things seemed more templar to me than assassin, and it was those limitations on freedom that caused the revolution in the first place, but who know it might just be another mindfuck.