cold_spirit
he/him
- AKA
- Alex T
Same, I’m very much in the single timeline camp. I arrive there because it makes sense that if Zack, Biggs or others are alive they will want to capitalise on the character relationships and drama that brings about. Isolating them and canning those opportunities seems unlikely.
I don’t think it needs a deep analysis.
If it's a single timeline and Zack is in Midgar while Aerith and the party are near Kalm, then yeah she wouldn't be at the church when he goes there. What's the purpose of the scene then? We could've deduced that before Intermission released.
The developers only ever make a few minutes of this high quality prerendered footage. With that little time, why choose to show us Zack discovering that Aerith isn't at the church? With separate timelines, this scene offers a new mystery. Where's Aerith? With a single timeline, it doesn't offer much. We know where Aerith is, she's with the party. Of those two possibilities, and considering this is part 1 of a multi-part series, to me it only makes sense to end the game on a new mystery.
I feel like it's the Stamp situation all over again. Some thought that it was just a bag of chips, some thought the new Stamp design was a reference to Zack and that's all. But now we know from the Ultimania that it's deliberate and purposeful. It's meant to be analyzed and to raise questions. This scene is no different.
The last line of the game is "Aerith...?" That's the last impression the story makes on us. I know I'm repeating myself, but I just can't see the answer to that question being "she's with the party at Kalm." We know that already. I can only justify this scene if it takes place in a different timeline. Then this scene is necessary. It sets up a conflict for this new arc. "Where's Aerith?"