**slams head to wall**
I do not care if you call her a Clito. I don't care if you call her a retard. I do not care if the terms pinker, shipper, fantard are thrown around like confetti. News flash: I'm one of the aggressive ones. However, the point I was trying to make--that apparently sailed right over your head--was that you can't berate someone for labeling a general shipping group as 'fantards' while simultaneously labeling that person directly with an unfavorable name. (even if it's "not as bad") Do you see how that's dumb?
Maybe I did not express myself clearly, most likely since my post was dashed off before work. I got what you were trying to argue, more or less, but my point was there has to be a line somewhere. If you really think calling someone a made-up derogatory term that literally means "person with extreme views on the LTD" for saying dumb things in the LTD is even remotely comparable to actually being called retarded, then I don't know what to tell you. People call Clerith shippers pinkers in this thread
all the time. If you want to get rid of the term "Clito" then you have to get rid of the term "pinker" as well. And I'm not sure how the LTD would function without them. We have to draw the line somewhere. Having "Clito" and "pinker" be acceptable seems an appropriate place. Because I know damn well that no one is going to stop using the term "pinker" no matter how much we try to stop them.
Let me be clear, because apparently I lost you somewhere. I think policing sigs and conversations and debates to prevent 'hurt feelings' is dumb. I think Drake saying that he wants Vendel to be in a wood chipper is far more damaging, insulting and in need of moderation than a girl calling a rival ship 'idiotic'.
Fine, if that's what you think then lobby to have the flaming rules changed. As they currently stand it is not directly insulting, and it does not qualify as flaming. I don't really care
what the rules are, as long as there's a clear definition for them. There probably is a better way to define what is insulting and what isn't; the current definition is horrendously vague and open to interpretation. Come up with one that's workable and we'll certainly be open to changing it.
And, for the record, Drake may very much dislike Vendel, but you can't honestly expect anyone to believe that his "shipping with a woodchipper" thing was anything but an over-the-top exaggeration.
Also, even if there are a few people being assholes, whatever counts as being an asshole by new Cleris standards....WHY IS ALL OF TLS RESPONSIBLE?
Well, the quote of Alex's that started all this very explicitly blames the problem on a small group of people. Granted, there may have been something on one of the pages after my hitherto most recent post that I missed because I only skimmed some of the discussion.
I'll also note for the record, if Vendel wasn't such an insufferable prick and was occasionally punished by the staff for being such towards other members, I wouldn't treat him as I do.
For the record, if in the future he breaks the rules and is not punished for doing so, report his posts and we will deal with them. In return you could stand to tone down your future posts towards him.