CameoAmalthea
Pro Adventurer
The fact that he didn't cower in fear in the face of extreme adversary like many young heirs in fiction was enough to sell him to me by disc 2.
Very true. It would have been simple enough for the writers to make him irredeemable. A complete monster along the lines of Joffrey from Game of Thrones
They could have made him obviously cruel, cowardly, and loathsome. Instead Rufus has likeable qualities including bravery and intelligence. Even at his worst, Rufus is logical.
In the beginning of Before Crisis he was an entitled brat and irritating villain, but as his character develops through the compilation he obtains the firm grasp on logic and mental perseverance that establish him as worthy and qualified for his position and ego despite his complete lack of compassion most of the time. This, I think, is what makes him a likable but legitimate villain in the OG.
While I agree that at the beginning of Before Crisis Rufus is terrible and you as the player hate him/want to strangle him, his cruel moments seem rational. I went into this at length on tumblr (http://cameoamalthea.tumblr.com/post/55874511945/ffvii-headcanon-rufus-shinra) and I’ll say it again here as the point is relevant.
Rufus is understandable, even when he’s being horrible. For instance, when Aerith is missing and Shinra is scrambling to track her down.
Rufus: The Ancient won’t be able to put up much of a resistance if she’s got a bullet in her, will she?
That is an absolutely horrible thing to say. (I mentioned wanting to hit Rufus right? This is an example of on of those moments - And not just because I love Aerith)
But when you think about it, Rufus’s reasoning, though heartless, is right. The President rejects Rufus’s proposal and in Rufus’s response we see where he’s coming from.
Veld
Let’s think about this rationally for a moment. We need to get the location of the Promised Land from her.
President Shinra
That’s right. The Promised Land is a legendary place nobody but the Ancients would know the location of. If she is harmed before we can get the location, all of our efforts will have been for nothing.
Rufus
……
President Shinra
The Promised Land… A place that spews forth boundless Mako. If we have the Promised Land, we can draw Mako out without using the reactors. We’ll be cutting costs and ensuring that the company stays at the top for ages to come. When I think about it that way, the time we’ve invested isn’t a waste.
Rufus
Hmph. The time that’s being wasted with all these unnecessary precautions cancels out any good that might come from it.
While Rufus is ruthless he does not enjoy cruelty for it’s own sake, rather’s he’s pragmatic to the extreme. He does what he thinks is necessary and efficient, even if it’s horrible.
There's nothing in the original game that concretely indicates him to be sadistic per se, but I think it could be rather easily assumed via artistic license given his other characteristics and simple characterization in the OG. That's how he was received according to a lot of fanfiction submitted before Advent Children.
True, I’m one of those later fans who came in after AC who basis my conception of Rufus more on Case of Shinra and BC.
(I was 8 when the OG came out and couldn’t read at the time or afford a play station, I did get one in 1998 but Spyro the Dragon was more my speed and then my system was stolen/never replaced so I didn’t become familiar with FFVII until college when my boyfriend introduced me to it).
As you noted
[/quote]Given the graphics and lack of voicing, whether he enjoyed informing the party of their fate or was apathetic, and whether or not he was originally thought of to be a sadistic character is of a variable mileage to the gamer.
As made clear by the compilation, he obviously enjoys figurative chess matches and screwing with people, but in Case of Shinra was disgusted by Mutten's sadistic tendencies and excessive torture devices. So, I've concluded that his character is just intended to be apathetically ruthless (albeit far less after Meteorfall due to his experiences) and smug. He wouldn't actually expect people to enjoy dominance to that extreme.
Personally, I feel that when the text does not provide an answer but the answer is provided in a related document, it’s ok to rely on the secondary source. So I tend to let the compilation stand as the canon in this instance and agree with your conclusions.
I think it’s another thing that makes Rufus interesting as a villain. He does cruel things, but doesn’t enjoy cruelty. He’s a villain who isn’t ‘evil’.