The Twilight Mexican
Ex-SeeD-ingly good
- AKA
- TresDias
Obsidian, that is just all kinds of excellent.
Pixel, are you still willing to work on audio content as well?I do want to do more for youtube. I just don't have time to create super indepth content. Editorial type content would be awesome as videos, but researching, writing and compiling everything into vid is time consuming.
That's pretty good, Lex. As well as nailing down what each role is called, we should also establish exactly what they entail. Then all we really need is someone with enthusiasm for the whole series to step forward and take on the Final Fantasy Editor's role. I don't know what the etiquette is regarding nominations, but I wonder if Tetsujin would consider taking it on? He's already a site contributor and has written about a diverse range of subjects. He also seems very knowledgeable about lots of games in the series.
Not only publishing, but organising and producing as well. They can delegate, of course, but that's up to them as well. I know I just put a lot of ideas forward in the podcast thread, but if it's not my job, then I'm not the one making decisions. The AV Editor should also curate video content for our Youtube channel.So Social Media Manager (possibly Gabe) and Audiovisual Editor (possibly Pixel) - the audiovisual editor will also be in charge of the podcast publications, yes? Or at least they should be.
Basically what you said:What exactly would that entail?
For example:General FF or KH news could be my thing, got the Square Enix press site news feed RSS'd and stuff.
The main thing I think is important for this role is to be quick about publishing this news, because as soon as that SE blog is updated it appears on about 20 different sites, so our goal should be to either beat them to it
Re: moderator privileges for site staff, have the relevant people been asked whether they actually want this added (albeit shared) responsibility?
Giving individuals moderator access to specific forums isn't a problem, it's mostly a matter of deciding what level of access they get - whether they can ban people or not, or whether it's more of a 'curator' role where they can move threads and edit titles and the occasional post and whatnot. IDK myself.
I also don't know for sure about giving them access to the moderator subforum; there has been some discussion about 'moderator talk' going on in the private staff section. (TBF anything non-moderator talk should just go in public IMHO, but I've rambled about that a few times now) Just saying, some people may or even should not have access to that section despite their position as moderator. Make sure they agree to it and shit first.
IMy use of the moderating tools would be to organise threads and not really to enforce the rules of the board. When posts get reported it's because there has been an infringement of the rules, and I'd be happy to leave it up to the S-mods to take care of it.
The only position that I'd still like to see filled which you didn't mention is Audiovisual Editor. Pixel is basically doing that job already, but he's posted so little in these discussions that I have no idea if he wants to continue.