I probably think that the reason I enjoy these films as much as I do is because I really didn't enjoy the Raimi Trilogy (a lot of that comes down to cinematography choices that he makes and lots of me completely losing suspension of disbelief in all of the films).
I can appreciate the gripe with the cinematography (the Webb films definitely fit the atmosphere of Spider-Man better in that respect), but I can't help but feel the first Raimi movie is a stronger film than the first Webb movie in telling its story and moving its plot along.
There are things each does that I like better. The first Raimi film does a much better job convincing me that its Peter Parker is an awkward nerd on the fringes while the first Webb film makes Spider-Man more witty like he should be. The Raimi film is more willing to have fun with and poke fun at its source material while the Webb film ties its Oscorp elements in better. Raimi's spider bite scene is less janky while Webb's Uncle Ben tragedy is more "modern" and relatable. Raimi's scenes of power discovery are more fun while Webb's transition to outright superheroics feels more organic. I could keep going.
Not sure what my point is, but I'm going to at least need to see AS2 (this weekend) before I can start to form an opinion on which is the stronger series.
andrew garfield emo hairflips.
Did the spider venom undo your common sense?
Just once I'd like to see a movie where someone makes a 'we can't be together' promise and actually keeps it. No takebacks, no convenient plot turns, they just both stick to their guns and move on.
Welp, I saw it. Despite concerns about Electro, I ended up really enjoying him in this.The effects with him were pretty sweet, but not overdone, and the ways Spidey took him down were great, classic Spidey.
In fact, the whole movie was pretty classic Spidey. It felt very much like a story from the comics, perhaps more than any of the other Spider-Movies to date. I'm still not sure whether it's a stronger film than the second Raimi installment, but the storytelling and pacing for this were leaps and bounds above the first Webb movie.
It's also really hard for me to say which is making for a stronger series. Both have some obvious strengths, and both have some things I just personally prefer that they're working on. Obviously the Webb movies have sidelined the Bugle stuff pretty hard, but that's fine given how much time has (or hasn't) passed, while leaving the door open to doing more with it later.
I do prefer this focus being given to the days of "young Spidey" rather than pushing him on ahead into the daily grind of adulthood, but that worked for the Raimi movies and isn't a quality mark against them.
Obviously, this movie has done the best of any at capturing the wit and banter Spidey makes, which is part of that "classic Spidey" feel, but I'd be lying if I said I don't really care for all the focus on Pete's parents. I know that's part of the comics lore, too, but holy shit, any time it came up much in the comics it annoyed the crap out of me there as well. The whole spies-turned-traitors-but-not-really thing for the parents of Spider-Man of all people never worked in the comics. It does work for what they're doing with the Webb movies, and actually works better here than it ever did in the comics, so I have to give kudos for making me able to tolerate it and not find it hokey as fuck.
Still don't know what the hell they were so adamant about uploading that data to Roosevelt for, though. Didn't seem to affect anything other than Pete getting to learn the truth.
In other things I didn't understand, it wasn't at all clear to me whether Harry went a bent insane here after getting the spider venom or whether the guy who opposed human experimentation actually just became that much of an asshole because he was angry at Spider-Man. Not that I don't get why he's angry. I actually found myself wanting to hit Spidey myself when he refused to offer up his blood. Um, why, Pete?
He's your friend and he's dying. He's right that you can't make him die any worse, and if you're concerned about blood compatibility, I think the owner of the world's leading bioresearch company can afford to run some preliminary tests. Are you just that concerned about him finding out your identity? You sure didn't hesitate to give that up to a chick you wanted to bone whose dad wanted to arrest you. Oy.
Completely nonsensical. Sweet fuck.
Anyway, Harry was cast well (beautiful eyes on that guy, I swear) and I really liked his story up until the rushed closing act where I wasn't able to make heads or tails of his mental state. And, yeah, the closing act with Harry as the Goblin felt very rushed compared to the rest of the movie, which had clicked along at a great pace (a lot of reviews have said it felt dragged on, but I never felt that way; it could have stood to be a little longer, actually).
So, in the course of writing this, I actually think I've concluded that the second Raimi film is stronger, though this movie might succeed at feeling the most like what a Spider-Man movie should?
Oh, but please fix that fucking embarrassing thing you're calling the Rhino, Webb. That is not Rhino, and I smack you on the nose for acting like it is.
For that matter, why was he even in the trailers for being in this movie so little? Not that I have a problem with him being in the movie (in fact, I love the note this ended on), but the Goblin received less trailer attention and actually mattered way more to the plot.
And, uh, if we're assembling a team, Harry, why is Rhino already out on the streets making a mess and preparing to get his ass handed to him as he goes back to prison or dies in battle? Did the spider venom undo your common sense?