The G'randiest' Daddy
Teh Bunneh of Doom
- AKA
- Darth
What I'm going to say next isn't directed at anyone in particular, though I have no doubt it will resonate more with some, and perhaps even offend, for lack of a better word, others. I don't want to argue with anyone - I am a lifelong Star Wars fan, I read dozens if not more of the EU books, played almost all of the games, and had all sorts of different experiences with each of them, as well as all the films. So all this is just personal opinion, and I think that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and/or enjoyment/dislike of everything Star Wars - it is, after all, just fiction.
That said
TL;DR, fiction's just stories, they can't be wrong, I guess. One can definitely write subjectively bad stories, but someone out there will love them .
But hey, at least most of us liked Rogue One .
That said
I feel as though people (in general) take things far too seriously, to the point of making personal opinion regarding Star Wars things into facts, and right and wrong, and black and white. The films, the games, the books, all of it was put together by a diverse crew of writers and storytellers, and often take all new approaches and take things in directions the others didn't. They are also often wildly contradictory.
I do think that stories should try to create a sense of internal consistency, but that was almost never the case with Star Wars (case in point, the Ysalamiri), and yet we as fans want our favourite theories and ideas to be "true". I feel that TLJ stayed true to the spirit of Star Wars - and I can't actually think of anything in it that I haven't seen in some form somewhere else in lore, though I concede I may be mis-remembering. My point is that I think some fan's feelings were hurt due to the immense emotional attachment that we (myself very much included) have to this series. Yet it remains a story, a piece of Star Wars fiction, and I think that all fiction belongs to the story-teller, not the audience.
To me, TLJ feels like the film that justifies TFA. Again, personal opinion, but after TFA, I was a little let down, I felt like I could have just gone to watch ANH again and it would have been the same. But TLJ makes TFA work, because it provides the answers to the questions of TFA, and in some ways ANH (though different answers than those provided by ESB, which is important).
It's so weird to me, because it seems as though we fans have been divided into two camps - those who love TFA, and then hate TLJ, and those who were dissapointed in TFA, but now love TLJ.
I do think that stories should try to create a sense of internal consistency, but that was almost never the case with Star Wars (case in point, the Ysalamiri), and yet we as fans want our favourite theories and ideas to be "true". I feel that TLJ stayed true to the spirit of Star Wars - and I can't actually think of anything in it that I haven't seen in some form somewhere else in lore, though I concede I may be mis-remembering. My point is that I think some fan's feelings were hurt due to the immense emotional attachment that we (myself very much included) have to this series. Yet it remains a story, a piece of Star Wars fiction, and I think that all fiction belongs to the story-teller, not the audience.
To me, TLJ feels like the film that justifies TFA. Again, personal opinion, but after TFA, I was a little let down, I felt like I could have just gone to watch ANH again and it would have been the same. But TLJ makes TFA work, because it provides the answers to the questions of TFA, and in some ways ANH (though different answers than those provided by ESB, which is important).
It's so weird to me, because it seems as though we fans have been divided into two camps - those who love TFA, and then hate TLJ, and those who were dissapointed in TFA, but now love TLJ.
TL;DR, fiction's just stories, they can't be wrong, I guess. One can definitely write subjectively bad stories, but someone out there will love them .
But hey, at least most of us liked Rogue One .