Sheva Alomar
I'm Alive and on Fire
- AKA
- Adri, Sir Integra, Fiona, Sango
What Masamune said times one hundred.
Hey, In Nolan I TrustBest not to judge too early. I remember people saying Heath Ledger's Joker looked like a tramp, and look how that turned out.
Btw, am I the only one who avoids these on-set movies?
Best not to judge too early. I remember people saying Heath Ledger's Joker looked like a tramp, and look how that turned out.
Btw, am I the only one who avoids these on-set movies?
EDIT: Doesn't look like very distinctive. Nothing cat-like about it.
The idea that this is just what she wears before she gets her official outfit reminded me of something, that Bruce did the same thing in the first film.
.perhaps Selina Kyle is another member of the League of Shadows?
It's best for you fucking chumps to stop making these ridiculous comparisons to Heath's Joker.
I LIKED his costume. The Joker is SUPPOSED to look trampy. The costumes in this film look like shit. We've seen them, how they look statically and in action.
.
Eh. In the comics, the Joker has clean make-up, slick hair and a dapper outfit. Ledger's had the messy face powder, mouth scars, greasy, unkempt hair and a suit picked from a thrift shop.
Ledger's Joker broke the convention, which is why it invoked a lot of controversy.
....No.
He doesn't wear makeup, his skin is fucking bleached with acid, and it's almost always depicted him as being hideously deformed.
His suit in the comics is no better than his in the film. In fact the one in the film probably looks better, since he spent goo gobs of mobster money on it, he didn't "pick it up from a thrift shop".
The long hair isn't really breaking the mold either, the only real change is the scars instead of the comics bizarre facial deformations. Ledger's appearance was fine, he looked like the Joker.
Bwhahahahah bullshit. Ledger's Joker invoked controversy because it was Heath Ledger, and people whined about his past films, especially Brokeback Mountain.
Big deal. I'm sure you could pull out a few pictures like that, since there's been many interpretations of the Joker by various artists. But ever since the character debuted, he has accepted appearance is much closer tothan it is to.
since there's been many interpretations of the Joker by various artists
Whatevs. The point stands that his face is pure white in the comics, but the movie went for a shabby paint job. If anything, you're just proving what a deviation it was from the original concept.
Looks pretty cheap to me, especially when you consider how it could have looked in the early designs. They even call it a "cheap purple suit" in the movie. He's just dicking with 'em with that retort.
I never said long hair, I said "greasy and unkempt". In most incarnations, the Joker has slick, thick hair, not all thin and skanky like.
There was plenty controversy surrounding TDK's Joker in general, both with the casting of Ledger and the unconventional character design.
The graphic novel Joker (I believe that was the nice simple title they used) ALSO had Mr. J appear with a set of scars in a Glasgow Smile, with facepaint instead of the usual perma-chalk skin and such. The Joker from TDK was visually based largely on this depiction, if I'm not mistaken.