CR, Anastar has been repeatedly stating her overall position, yes.
The problem is that her particular arguments do not mesh with that overall position.
In fact, her overall position is 'supported' by a number of assumptions that to all outside, rational observers appear arbitrary and unfounded, that appear to be convenient 'just so' stories without any evidence.
On the subject of the Sony made commercial- and by the way, someone PLEASE tell Annie that the stance regarding commercials here and pretty much in the entire world is 'Commercials are not to be trusted as authoritative, period, end of speech.'- but setting aside that it's, y'know, made by the english marketing division of another company entirely, Anastar makes a giant stink about how the caption says 'Love' and INSISTS this means Cloud loves Aerith. But there's nothing in the commercial to say it does. All it says is that the game contains a 'love that could never be.' Once again, granting purely for the sake of argument, it never says whose love. It could be Cloud's, it could be Aerith's.
Aerith actually has an established love FOR Cloud, so she is the far more parsimonious answer.
Likewise, Anastar's position that the Affection values- always referred to in terms of X's affection for Cloud- must represent Cloud's affection for each is totally unfounded.
Her related stance that Yuffie and Barret, who also possess this value towards Cloud, are exempt from its consideration- that you can choose if Cloud loves Tifa or Aerith, but not Yuffie, even if her AV are highest- is without basis and entirely arbitrary.
Anastar's stance re: the low affection version is unfounded position after unfounded position.
Firstly, Anastar argues in more than her POV that the low version is low because Cloud loves Aerith, and that's why he loves Tifa less (Even though you can get the low version with Tifa's AV higher than Aerith's), she argues this as narrative fact. If it is merely her unsupported view of things, she need to call it such.
Additionally is her insistence that feelings are shared/confirmed in the low version. The only word that we have on the low version is that it is apathetic and ends short, which means- even using the less common 'indifferent' definition- that feelings were not confirmed. You cannot both be apathetic and contain feelings. It's literally a contradiction in terms. So to can the scene and conversation be apathetic and contain a confirmation of feelings.
Anastar's repeating of her points on this subject are to rephrase the situation to that the actors in the scene are indifferent, but this is not how the scene is described.
Tifa's complex feelings quote.
The word 'jealousy' is never used in the quote, the complex feelings are never called that. That Tifa considers Aerith a love rival is not said (It says Aerith can be considered a love rival). The complex feelings of FFVII and AC are never implied to be the same. Anastar ignores that the quote actually explains why Tifa's feelings are complicated in AC.
Most egregiously, in my mind, however, is her continued and quite false insistence that the FTOIL page and P232 say anything about the mutual confirmation of romantic feelings being optional.
FTOIL says 'Cloud and Tifa confirm their mutual [romantic] feelings for each other without words'
P232 says in the story summary 'Cloud and Tifa confirm their mutual feelings for each other without words'
In the deviation sidebar, it says 'If the degree of affection is high, the feelings shared will be earnest blah blah blah'
Quite literally, nothing on p232 contradicts the explicit statement of FTOIL. In fact, nearly the exact same words are used in the story section. Even the deviation only mentions that feelings are intense when the affection is high. It says nothing about them being absent when affection is low (for the moment, we will be using Anastar's argument that many of the quotes never specify which version feelings are confirmed in, so they must be confirmed in both)
Neither p232 or FTOIL say anything about a version when the discussion of mutual feelings occurs. By Anastar's logic applied to the other 'confirmation' quotes, this confirmation of romantic feelings can happen in either version as well.
Both the quote on FTOIL and 232 are entirely version agnostic, even with the deviation listing there.
And then there's Anastar's granddaddy of all wallbangers, something she said that not only has NO foundational support at all, but also reveals she's not actually arguing neutrality.
Anastar says that if Cloud doesn't love one woman, he must love the other. Anastar used this statement as support for why Cloud might love Aerith in the LA version despite any actual evidence in favor of such an outcome.
This a named logical fallacy- the false dichotomy, the false statement that there are only two possible outcomes to a scenario.- and Anastar has no evidence at all that Cloud's romance is a zero sum game (At the bare minimum, there are 4 outcomes to who Cloud loves, Both, Tifa, Aerith, Neither).
But I also said this reveals how Anastar is not arguing optionality. It's because Anastar insists that if Cloud does not love Tifa, he must love Aerith (no, I don't presume there's a vice versa in there) and Anastar is trying to show Cloud does not love Tifa.
Yes, Anastar says 'could' be, but Anastar repeatedly goes through 'could' arguments to come to an 'is' conclusion. Did in her C/P essay, has multiple times in this thread.
She's not neutral. We know she's not neutral. SHE knows she's not neutral. We merely think she should stop pretending.
Oh, and COLW never says SEPHIROTH took the woman's life.
It says the MAN took the Woman's life.
Yeah, as long as people continue to be idiotic about the RF quote describing Tifa's role as someone's beloved, so too will I act as though we cannot know who these people are, to show you how silly you are being.