X-SOLDIER
Harbinger O Great Justice
- AKA
- X
Since Tres covered the other post very succinctly, I'll just respond to Minato's:
Yes, in the absence of the Jedi ways, the Sith would have taken over and dominated the galaxy completely. However, in the absence of the Sith, the Jedi did the same thing for all intents and purposes. Their role was a selfless one, rather than the selfish one, but you’re still looking at scenarios where there is one sect of Force Users devoted to a single aspect of the Force in a position of power over the rest of the Galaxy, and doing so kept the Force out of balance.
Additionally Ben doesn’t show the ideals and dogma of the Sith were positive. You’ve got that a little bit backwards. Ben shows the views of the Jedi can be evil. He’s VERY much embracing the “let go of anything you fear to lose” when he’s going to let the Resistance be destroyed. It’s the pain and loss of killing his father that’s breaking his connection to the Dark Side, rather than strengthening it. It's his familial connections and the dangers they're in that makes him hesitate when attacking the cruiser with his mother on board.
It’s Rey who shows that the paths that only the Sith focused on can be used for things other than evil. She experiences DEEP loss and absolute seething hatred towards Ben. She dives right in to the Dark Side cave without hesitation, and when she goes there physically the vision leaves her alone – something that causes her MASSIVE pain, but pain she embraces. All her connections bring her pain, but those, along with the reality of her parents abandoning her is something that she holds on to, rather than something that she lets go of like she would have been taught under the Jedi Order.
Holding on to pain would normally have been a path to the Dark Side.
In this case, letting go of that pain from attachments and overthrowing that's the path that the Dark Side is taking.
But HOW they instruct him is important. They DON’T teach him how to control his emotions and use that power in the Force for good. They teach him how to detach so that he doesn’t experience the emotions that lead to that. That’s a VERY significant difference in the specifics, because it’s that viewpoint that ultimately pushes Anakin to the Dark Side. The Jedi would tell him to let go of Padmé and not to mourn her death, whereas the Sith would tell him to seek the power to save her in the Dark Side. Again, it’s the point that the Dark Side is inherently selfishly motivated, but not evil. Plagueis’ ability to keep loved ones from dying and creating life are INCREDIBLY selfish, but they’re absolutely not evil powers.
Like I just mentioned with Plagueis: Being selfish isn’t inherently evil at all. Being completely selfish is, and that’s what the Sith are (again, anyone only embracing ONE side of the Force and rejecting the other is problematic on both sides). Balancing selfish and selfless urges are IMPORTANT. The Jedi codes became all about only embracing the selfless and rejecting anything selfish – and that kept throwing the Force out of balance.
Which Dark Side powers are inherently not safe to be used by people? As a preemptive counter-argument: Mind Tricks that the Jedi use is a power that’s inherently RIDDLED with potential dangers for abuse – but that doesn’t stop the Jedi from instructing people on how to use it safely. There’s nothing that the Dark Side offers that couldn’t be used safely, just like there aren’t any things that the Jedi have that couldn’t be abused.
You completely misunderstand the SCOPE of things here. The Jedi and the Sith have been at war with each other on and off for THOUSANDS of years. The dogmas of the Jedi and the Sith during that time have become diametrically opposed: EACH rigidly adhere to only utilizing ONE SIDE of the Force. The Jedi are supposed to be about teaching and maintaining balance, not about eliminating the Dark Side. When that’s what they’d both come to practice, each of them kept bringing each side of the Force against each other as the other waxed and waned in power. It was a cycle of never-ending war.
The conflict in Episode I was orchestrated by the Dark Lord of the Sith, but that’s a very small part of a conflict between the two of them that has been going on for literal MILLENNIA. That conflict keeps coming back again and again, by tipping things towards either the Light or the Dark. The idea of the balance is that that cyclical conflict DOESN’T return because both sides exist in harmony, rather than being turned against one another. That's why both the Jedi and the Sith were destroyed.
In a cosmic sense, the Jedi rejecting the Dark Side ABSOLUTELY DID force Palpatine and Snoke into being. They also DEFINITELY stoked the return of the conflict between Light and Dark that brought about that war. By keeping the practices of Force Users focused on only the Light for 1000 years, they were building up a catastrophic event when the balance inevitably tipped back. Like the Father says, "Too much dark OR light would be the undoing of life as you understand it." You can't claim that by keeping the Dark side of the Force actively suppressed for 1000 years that the Jedi weren't equally responsible for creating that event. It's just like claiming that Sidious creating the Empire and taking over the galaxy and slaughtering all the Light Side Force Users wasn't also setting up for the Light to return and destroy the Sith. Claiming those things don't cause one another isn't looking at the bigger picture of the Force and its relationship to conflict in the galaxy.
Anakin loved his home planet, too. Tattooine also happened to be ruled by the Hutts, where he and his mother was LITERALLY slaves. The Jedi didn't do a single fucking thing about it. Padmé's disgusted by it when she finds out that that sort of injustice is happening in a Republic where the Jedi have been in power, unopposed for 1000 years. Despite being a member of that noble order, the Jedi never used his connections to that planet in an attempt to bring justice to it. His mother died horribly. What the Jedi were doing wasn't a flawless compass towards the path to justice and peace either. That's evident in the VERY start of Episode I.
The Jedi selflessly enforce the justice as determined by the democracy of the senate, because that matches their ideals to achieving peace. The Sith selfishly enforce justice by taking control because they believe that they are the best equipped to lead the galaxy, because that matches their ideals to achieving peace. Both the systems of the Old Republic AND the Galactic Empire constantly fail people all over the galaxy. One gets mired in the inaction of bureaucracy and inaction and the other is overly totalitarian. Those systems need a balance, but those orders keep building just one or the other as each one falls.
The whole point on a personal level is that your actions AREN'T put at odds if you can learn to balance BOTH selfish and selfless motives. People naturally exist with both, and you can control both. Just because you want to trains as a force wielder doesn't mean that you have to devote yourself to EITHER being a completely detached monk OR a totally self-obsessed maniac – but that's what the Jedi & Sith are causing by clinging to one side and pushing away the other. They don't have to be in violent opposition towards one another if you accept that you can't ever completely destroy one side or the other. It will ALWAYS push back. That's why the Balance is the answer, and both the Jedi and Sith were incredibly problematic and needed to be removed to keep from just repeating the mistakes of the past.
X
The Jedi ways cause the Dark to return, yeah, because the Dark Side continues to exist and the Sith were removed, those Sith were trying or succeeding to subjugate the galaxy. In absence of the Jedi ways, users of the Dark Side would've dominated the galaxy completely.
And how does Ben show that the ideals and dogma of the Sith aren't limited to evil? Even if he's not evil (I'm not convinced of this BTW) He's not a Sith. The Sith as per the prophecy were destroyed, his actions don't inform them.
Yes, in the absence of the Jedi ways, the Sith would have taken over and dominated the galaxy completely. However, in the absence of the Sith, the Jedi did the same thing for all intents and purposes. Their role was a selfless one, rather than the selfish one, but you’re still looking at scenarios where there is one sect of Force Users devoted to a single aspect of the Force in a position of power over the rest of the Galaxy, and doing so kept the Force out of balance.
Additionally Ben doesn’t show the ideals and dogma of the Sith were positive. You’ve got that a little bit backwards. Ben shows the views of the Jedi can be evil. He’s VERY much embracing the “let go of anything you fear to lose” when he’s going to let the Resistance be destroyed. It’s the pain and loss of killing his father that’s breaking his connection to the Dark Side, rather than strengthening it. It's his familial connections and the dangers they're in that makes him hesitate when attacking the cruiser with his mother on board.
It’s Rey who shows that the paths that only the Sith focused on can be used for things other than evil. She experiences DEEP loss and absolute seething hatred towards Ben. She dives right in to the Dark Side cave without hesitation, and when she goes there physically the vision leaves her alone – something that causes her MASSIVE pain, but pain she embraces. All her connections bring her pain, but those, along with the reality of her parents abandoning her is something that she holds on to, rather than something that she lets go of like she would have been taught under the Jedi Order.
Holding on to pain would normally have been a path to the Dark Side.
In this case, letting go of that pain from attachments and overthrowing that's the path that the Dark Side is taking.
They accept Anakin, despite his committing genocide out of anger, hate and revenge, they just continued to instruct in a fashion they feel would prevent him from doing those kinds of things again.
But HOW they instruct him is important. They DON’T teach him how to control his emotions and use that power in the Force for good. They teach him how to detach so that he doesn’t experience the emotions that lead to that. That’s a VERY significant difference in the specifics, because it’s that viewpoint that ultimately pushes Anakin to the Dark Side. The Jedi would tell him to let go of Padmé and not to mourn her death, whereas the Sith would tell him to seek the power to save her in the Dark Side. Again, it’s the point that the Dark Side is inherently selfishly motivated, but not evil. Plagueis’ ability to keep loved ones from dying and creating life are INCREDIBLY selfish, but they’re absolutely not evil powers.
Because using great power in anger or fear or hate or to selfishly achieve ones own ends alone is an inheritely bad idea and it's not a model by which justice and peace is achieved.
There's a difference between inheritely evil and inheritely not safe to be use by people.
Like I just mentioned with Plagueis: Being selfish isn’t inherently evil at all. Being completely selfish is, and that’s what the Sith are (again, anyone only embracing ONE side of the Force and rejecting the other is problematic on both sides). Balancing selfish and selfless urges are IMPORTANT. The Jedi codes became all about only embracing the selfless and rejecting anything selfish – and that kept throwing the Force out of balance.
Which Dark Side powers are inherently not safe to be used by people? As a preemptive counter-argument: Mind Tricks that the Jedi use is a power that’s inherently RIDDLED with potential dangers for abuse – but that doesn’t stop the Jedi from instructing people on how to use it safely. There’s nothing that the Dark Side offers that couldn’t be used safely, just like there aren’t any things that the Jedi have that couldn’t be abused.
The Light Side didn't create war to destroy the Dark Side. The Jedi entered a war to oppose Dooku's attack on the Republic. There are Force Sects out there that don't seek dominion of the galaxy or exclusively use the Light Side of the Force and the Jedi leaves them be. Until Palpatine involves them because Sith is definitely both all about tthe Dark Side and dominion of the galaxy including all other force sects. Episode I makes that clear, Maul being a force user they don't know is one thing, being a Sith Lord quite another.
All fighting forces and organisations in the galaxy were founded to protect this and that interest. And they all failed when matched against Palpatine's ambitions. The Republic was an objective failure in this regard as well. Does not mean it should not exist, nor that practitioners of the Light Side who guard it and attempt to achieve peace and justice should not exist.
You completely misunderstand the SCOPE of things here. The Jedi and the Sith have been at war with each other on and off for THOUSANDS of years. The dogmas of the Jedi and the Sith during that time have become diametrically opposed: EACH rigidly adhere to only utilizing ONE SIDE of the Force. The Jedi are supposed to be about teaching and maintaining balance, not about eliminating the Dark Side. When that’s what they’d both come to practice, each of them kept bringing each side of the Force against each other as the other waxed and waned in power. It was a cycle of never-ending war.
The conflict in Episode I was orchestrated by the Dark Lord of the Sith, but that’s a very small part of a conflict between the two of them that has been going on for literal MILLENNIA. That conflict keeps coming back again and again, by tipping things towards either the Light or the Dark. The idea of the balance is that that cyclical conflict DOESN’T return because both sides exist in harmony, rather than being turned against one another. That's why both the Jedi and the Sith were destroyed.
The Jedi didn't create war, they didn't force Palpatine and Snoke into being. And whether or not choosing not be a personal user of it creates conflict within the Force or not, use of the Dark Side (using the Force in anger or aggression or otherwise letting your emotions guide it's use) in inself is not perfect way to achieve either peace or justice. Justice certainly doesn't enter into it. If you thought your actions were just, you wouldn't need emotions to guide your actions to doing them.
Ezra loves his homeplanet, his homeplanet also happened to genuinely be in an unjust occuption by a foreign aggressor his entire life, good for him. But your loved ones aren't always a flawless compass towards the path to justice and peace and sooner or later letting the Dark Side influence your actions will put you at odds.
In a cosmic sense, the Jedi rejecting the Dark Side ABSOLUTELY DID force Palpatine and Snoke into being. They also DEFINITELY stoked the return of the conflict between Light and Dark that brought about that war. By keeping the practices of Force Users focused on only the Light for 1000 years, they were building up a catastrophic event when the balance inevitably tipped back. Like the Father says, "Too much dark OR light would be the undoing of life as you understand it." You can't claim that by keeping the Dark side of the Force actively suppressed for 1000 years that the Jedi weren't equally responsible for creating that event. It's just like claiming that Sidious creating the Empire and taking over the galaxy and slaughtering all the Light Side Force Users wasn't also setting up for the Light to return and destroy the Sith. Claiming those things don't cause one another isn't looking at the bigger picture of the Force and its relationship to conflict in the galaxy.
Anakin loved his home planet, too. Tattooine also happened to be ruled by the Hutts, where he and his mother was LITERALLY slaves. The Jedi didn't do a single fucking thing about it. Padmé's disgusted by it when she finds out that that sort of injustice is happening in a Republic where the Jedi have been in power, unopposed for 1000 years. Despite being a member of that noble order, the Jedi never used his connections to that planet in an attempt to bring justice to it. His mother died horribly. What the Jedi were doing wasn't a flawless compass towards the path to justice and peace either. That's evident in the VERY start of Episode I.
The Jedi selflessly enforce the justice as determined by the democracy of the senate, because that matches their ideals to achieving peace. The Sith selfishly enforce justice by taking control because they believe that they are the best equipped to lead the galaxy, because that matches their ideals to achieving peace. Both the systems of the Old Republic AND the Galactic Empire constantly fail people all over the galaxy. One gets mired in the inaction of bureaucracy and inaction and the other is overly totalitarian. Those systems need a balance, but those orders keep building just one or the other as each one falls.
The whole point on a personal level is that your actions AREN'T put at odds if you can learn to balance BOTH selfish and selfless motives. People naturally exist with both, and you can control both. Just because you want to trains as a force wielder doesn't mean that you have to devote yourself to EITHER being a completely detached monk OR a totally self-obsessed maniac – but that's what the Jedi & Sith are causing by clinging to one side and pushing away the other. They don't have to be in violent opposition towards one another if you accept that you can't ever completely destroy one side or the other. It will ALWAYS push back. That's why the Balance is the answer, and both the Jedi and Sith were incredibly problematic and needed to be removed to keep from just repeating the mistakes of the past.
X