General writing fiction discussion thrad.

Ghost X

Moderator
Re: Happy endings. I think my stories are bitter sweet. Lots of bad things happen in the story itself (deeeath!!!), but there's generally an epilogue that speaks about some sort of hopeful future. I also think of writing alternate endings, kind of like how video games have multiple endings. Perhaps having entire novels dedicated to alternate timelines, to explore the universe, etc. None of this I've written though. Don't have any time to write at the moment :(. Can't wait to get back into it though. Got a lot more concepts to play with that I've been learning about from uni.
 

Keveh Kins

Pun Enthusiast
@ClementRage: Aside from how he kinda acts like a man-child at points, I dislike him because I think his character is an unnecessary addition to the FF7 story. I know you could argue a lot of the compilation fits that bill as well, but Genesis in particular seemed to be created arbitrarily in order to open up the possibility of a sequel to DoC...and to advertise Gackt.

Then they fired him into Crisis Core and tried to flesh him out, and he wasn't all that likeable, but not in the way that the antagonist is supposed to be unlikeable, for their villainous acts and nefariousness and whatnot. He did nefarious things, like with his role in the Nibelheim incident, but the problem was that he wasn't necessary for that to happen, he was just inserted into it arbitrarily and the situation would have panned out the same regardless. If the OG could pull it off effectively and make it believable without him, why was he needed?

Genesis just felt like an unnecessary tack-on character to me. I'm sure that a good fanfic writer could make him a much more effective character in their own story, but when it comes to canon his presence annoys me because he doesn't need to be there.
 

Clement Rage

Pro Adventurer
I understand, I guess, I felt something similar about all the behind the scenes Turks in BC, but if you wanted to make CC, you needed something for Zack to do. Wutai... wouldn't really be dangerous enough for a top tier SOLDIER, and fighting an actual war wouldn't work for this kind of game. Plus you couldn't defeat them otherwise. In order to give Zack a challenge, he needs to be fighting SOLDIER level enemies, because they're established as the most dangerous humans in the setting. Sephiroth is already spoken for, so you need a new SOLDIER antagonist. Since Shinra is evil, we don't want Zack to have no reason not to join in the rebellion, hence Genesis copies that you don't have to think 'hey, maybe they have a point'. And since Sephy's established as the best, the natural way to go was 'the second best guy, who feels he gets a raw deal.'
 
Your explanation of their reasoning is not implausible, Clem, and it's probably the best case one can make for Genesis's existence. But I don't agree that Wutai wouldn't have been dangerous enough for a top tier SOLDIER. There aren't that many SOLDIERs, and the war did drag on for, what, ten years? So Wutai cannot have been completely outclassed. Plus, there was no need to promote Zack so early on in the game (or even to make him a 1st class at tbh). IIRC, in the OG Aerith only said that her boyfriend had been in SOLDIER, not that he was First Class.

I'm sure there are plenty of fanfics that make something worthwhile out of Genesis's character, but since I don't like him, I avoid reading anything that features him.
 

Keveh Kins

Pun Enthusiast
^Pretty sure Aerith does ask Cloud what rank he was, to which he responds he was a 1st and she says something along the lines of "Just like he was." That aside, I agree they really could have made a bigger deal out of Zack's quest to becoming 1st class, would have made his dissatisfaction with finally reaching it more poignant maybe? I dunno
 

Clement Rage

Pro Adventurer
Wutai would have been dangerous, but not on an individual, one to one level that you need for memorable bossfights. Real wars, especially the ones lasting years, are pretty boring to participate in, that's why in most RPGs the players are sent on some special mission or in the back door while the enemy assaults the main gate. Certain things are set, Zack can't overshadow Sephy, and he can't kill Godo or ascend the pagoda, so for a sense of accomplishment, the way they'd probably go is to have some rogue Wutai warlord discovers yet another ultimate destruction magic (what are we on by now, four?) and he has to stop them. While with Genesis, the fact that Sephy likes him means that he's taken off the field and Zack gets a chance to shine, and nobody has a plan to destroy the world for once.

I'm sure there are some good Genesis fics, but apart from The Fifth Act, finding them involves trawling through quite a few where he's secretly in love with Angeal/Sephiroth/Zack/Kunsel.
 

Obsidian Fire

Ahk Morn!
AKA
The Engineer
My thing with Sephiroth and Angeal is that both of them are "meh" characters. I didn't really like them, I didn't really hate them. They don't really show a lot of reaction to what Shin-Ra did to them until they mentally break down and kill themselves. Genesis on the other hand... that guy at least has a reaction to what's going on in Shin-Ra before he goes into a full on breakdown. He has enough of a emotional reaction to Shin-Ra to actually try to do something. He puts enough emotion into what he's doing to get me as a reader/player involved with how he's going to handle the situation. Only, he reacts really badly to that situation. The thing is, Angeal and Sephrioth don't react that much better (Sephiroth reacts worse). This kinda leaves Genesis in my mind as the only person out of the 1st Class trio where I have enough emotions invested to like him or hate him. The thing is, we already know what's going to happen to Sephiroth, so if anything we feel sorry for him. Angeal isn't trying to kill people other then himself, which is more then we can say for Genesis. So that leaves Geneses to draw the ire of the fandom.

Which I've personally come to see as something of an, "If I were in his shoes I would be able to react more locally then he did" reaction. For myself though, I'm not so sure. Finding out that the people you work with experimented on you without your permission and now that experimentation is killing you and also your best friend? I don't think I'd go as far as Genesis did. But keeping tabs on the scientist that says they have a cure for you, getting a hold of that cure, and going after the company who messed me up in the first place would probably be on my to-do list.
 
Yeah, just not a SOLDIER fan here. I avoid their fanfic, but I wish it well.

I'd like to take a moment to comment on the point Fangu raised about fanfic as fanfic versus fanfic as fiction. I actually wrote a long reply to her tumblr post and then accidentally shut Safari down before posting it, so I lost it all.

Anyway - in my idle moments I have sometimes pondered whether it's possible to classify fanfiction as a literary genre in its own right - a genre that, like other once-maligned genres (detective novel and science fiction spring to mind), is slowly gaining respectability due to its widespread popularity and the seriousness with which some scholars of popular culture approach it.

If it is a genre, what are its defining characteristics? Well, the most obvious is that it works with an existing canon of characters, world, and plot that are as much the property of all the other readers/watchers/players as they are hers. This makes the life of a fanfiction writer easier in one way, since her readers already knows her characters and world and have an interest in them; she doesn't have to do all the heavy lifting of making her readers interested in characters and a world from scratch. Of course, this aspect of fanfiction often leads to lazy writing, self-indulgent writing, and fan-service writing. There's nothing inherently wrong with fan-service writing; one could even argue that it's the whole reason fanfic exists. But just because it's fan-service doesn't mean it has to be lazy, or self-indulgent, or bad.

Can we distinguish between fanfic as fanfic and fanfic as fiction? I guess it's possible, although any such distinction would be for the sake of argument, i.e. fanfic as fanfic = fan-service, fanfic as fiction = art (???). But I think a fanfic can be art and also fanservice.

On tumblr Fangu posed a question which I understood to be asking this: why would anyone pour so much effort and craft into writing fiction (as opposed to fan fiction) about somebody else's world and characters? Why not put all that skill and effort into your own world and characters? On one level, it's because those particular characters and world inspire us with something we want to say, with ideas we want to explore. But I also think that the best fanfiction becomes literature when it takes the existing canon and uses it to play on our feelings and evoke certain responses. When I read a fanfic in which, say, Tifa is killed off, it evokes a different response in me than when I read an original work of fiction in which an original character to whom i have become attached is killed off.

I suppose my ultimate objection to the notion that we can separate fanfic as fanfic from fanfic as fiction is that this notion plays into the old prejudice that fanfic is by definition bad writing. Shakespeare wrote nothing but fanfic, in the sense that he was inspired by pre-existing characters and plots and felt that, by developing them in his own unique way, he could do something interesting, new and different with them.

One fanfic I know that perfectly illustrates the pojnt I'm trying, rather inarticulately, to make is this one:

http://archiveofourown.org/works/489533 "And is there honey still for tea?"

This story only works because it's fanfic about an icon of idyllic childhood. Original characters could never convey quite the same message.
 

Fangu

Great Old One
I'm really sad you lost that type up Lic :( But this post is awesome too!

I'm with you all the way until the next segment - not that I disagree with the next segment. I do agree with the suggestion that fanfic exists mainly for fanservice (term used widely here) - for escapism, if you will; for comfort, for the love of existing characters and their universe.
Can we distinguish between fanfic as fanfic and fanfic as fiction? I guess it's possible, although any such distinction would be for the sake of argument, i.e. fanfic as fanfic = fan-service, fanfic as fiction = art (???). But I think a fanfic can be art and also fanservice.
This is the tricky thing to define - this 'art (???)'. For me, fanfic as fiction is a way to describe fanfic that sits closer to - relates closer to - general writing techniques used when writing fiction. Because fanfiction borrows characters and universes, there isn't a need to carefully describe and build a world, as you said. You can make a few shortcuts. Your reader will allow you more - not mistakes, because that's not the right way to say it - freedom. You can start your story with two pages of recap, or jump straight into a large piece of dialogue - and you might not lose the reader because of it. Not because the reader is dumb in any way, but because there's a chance the reader will appreciate anything that builds on the world they've already established in their head.
On tumblr Fangu posed a question which I understood to be asking this: why would anyone pour so much effort and craft into writing fiction (as opposed to fan fiction) about somebody else's world and characters? Why not put all that skill and effort into your own world and characters?
My point with this was - if you're writing fanfiction as a writing exercise (I might have phrased that poorly), you might be cheating out because fanfiction doesn't crave the same attention to the craft of writing as fiction in general. Now this is where it turns sort of shrug for me, because I don't know. I'm making the assumption you're allowed more leeway with fanfiction. But I'm also making the assumption fanfiction readers don't read fanfic for a clever and crafty read. (I don't! Not always, anyway.) I read fanfiction for smut comfort, for reading other people's take on the characters I love.
I suppose my ultimate objection to the notion that we can separate fanfic as fanfic from fanfic as fiction is that this notion plays into the old prejudice that fanfic is by definition bad writing.
It's not bad if it doesn't constantly pay attention to writing techniques, not at all. But trying to separate this 'bad', to pull it out from the mix - why is fanfiction considered poor writing, even the good ones? Can it be related to my points above, to how writing fanfic is 'easier' because it allows you leeway, even to some point, being lazy?

So that's me elaborating a bit on my thoughts on the subject. I don't know if I'm onto anything - at all. It's just that I've reached this crossroads of writing fanfic where I've started asking myself if these very clear images I have in my head of existing characters - are they hindering me from paying attention to worldbuilding and characterbuilding, because I (and my readers) see them so clearly? I already know Basch is blond, fandom know he's blond, and so when I want to describe Basch in a fanfic (even if I technically don't have to because readers will know what he looks like) as a writing exercise, I end up focusing on what I already know about him - I might describe him as blond. While that's not how you'd start describing a character in fiction, because blond doesn't add anything to his character, at least not on the first two pages. A sword arm does. A piece of armour. A shaking hand. Anything that's not describing his hair as blond, yet that's what I come back to.

Looking back at my OC's, I always describe them, but very briefly - and visible characteristics are NOT what I start with. Never.

And then I start wondering - having these images, are they a hinder rather than a help? Is writing fanfic as fiction really worth the time spent doing that exercise - especially when readers don't give a rat's ass about that kind of fic, but read smut or ship comfort instead?

I'm just piling on with more questions :wacky:
 
Thanks, Obsidian, that was well worth reading.

@ Fangu (who posted while I was reading Obsidian's link) - I'll give a more thoughtful reply later, but I just wanted to say that yes, it's really interesting that so many fanfic writers, myself included, seem to feel the need to describe characters even though the readers already know what those characters look like.
 

Skan

Pro Adventurer
AKA
dief
Characters are only as boring as you make them out to be.

Well, minus Sephiroth. He's just boring. :P Unfortunately, I write him the best out of the three. I am, after all, a boring person.

Angeal is someone I didn't find interesting until I started writing more of him. I think it's easy to dismiss him as stupid or simple, but it's possible to take another angle on his character that turns him into more of a Reeve-like character: someone who knows that the company does bad things, but stays with them anyways and takes up that "mentor role" within SOLDIER, because he figures that's the best way to make a difference -- well, until Genesis crashes in to the plot.

Genesis is just fascinating to me. I have a thing for ambitious fuck-ups with a huge heaping of darkness.

Clement, I don't think "good Genesis fics" and fics in which he's "secretly in love with [insert character here]" are mutually exclusive. Off the top of my head, I can think of four more stories that are arguably more nuanced in their treatment of Genesis, though they all feature pairings in some form or another. I might add a fifth one to the list as well, though it's more of an AU.
 

Obsidian Fire

Ahk Morn!
AKA
The Engineer
The reason why I don't find Angeal that interesting is that I've read enough works of people in his position that handle it way better then he does. I don't know. I can't think of very many more non-villian ways of handling the situation then his "I can't reconcile my humanity with my perceived inhumanity so I'm going to force my student (the one I have a father-son bond with to boot) to kill me whether he wants to or not". It just leaves a really, really bad taste in my mouth that the person who is so concerned with honor acts completely counter to it. None of the 1st Classes react well to finding out what Shin-Ra did to them, so you pretty much have to pick your poison with all of them.
 

Clement Rage

Pro Adventurer
Characters are only as boring as you make them out to be.

Well, minus Sephiroth. He's just boring. :P Unfortunately, I write him the best out of the three. I am, after all, a boring person.

Angeal is someone I didn't find interesting until I started writing more of him. I think it's easy to dismiss him as stupid or simple, but it's possible to take another angle on his character that turns him into more of a Reeve-like character: someone who knows that the company does bad things, but stays with them anyways and takes up that "mentor role" within SOLDIER, because he figures that's the best way to make a difference -- well, until Genesis crashes in to the plot.

Genesis is just fascinating to me. I have a thing for ambitious fuck-ups with a huge heaping of darkness.

Clement, I don't think "good Genesis fics" and fics in which he's "secretly in love with [insert character here]" are mutually exclusive. Off the top of my head, I can think of four more stories that are arguably more nuanced in their treatment of Genesis, though they all feature pairings in some form or another. I might add a fifth one to the list as well, though it's more of an AU.
Of course, but it's not particularly to my taste.
 

Roger

He/him
AKA
Minato
My thing with Sephiroth and Angeal is that both of them are "meh" characters. I didn't really like them, I didn't really hate them. They don't really show a lot of reaction to what Shin-Ra did to them until they mentally break down and kill themselves. Genesis on the other hand... that guy at least has a reaction to what's going on in Shin-Ra before he goes into a full on breakdown. He has enough of a emotional reaction to Shin-Ra to actually try to do something. He puts enough emotion into what he's doing to get me as a reader/player involved with how he's going to handle the situation. Only, he reacts really badly to that situation. The thing is, Angeal and Sephrioth don't react that much better (Sephiroth reacts worse). This kinda leaves Genesis in my mind as the only person out of the 1st Class trio where I have enough emotions invested to like him or hate him. The thing is, we already know what's going to happen to Sephiroth, so if anything we feel sorry for him. Angeal isn't trying to kill people other then himself, which is more then we can say for Genesis. So that leaves Geneses to draw the ire of the fandom.

Which I've personally come to see as something of an, "If I were in his shoes I would be able to react more locally then he did" reaction. For myself though, I'm not so sure. Finding out that the people you work with experimented on you without your permission and now that experimentation is killing you and also your best friend? I don't think I'd go as far as Genesis did. But keeping tabs on the scientist that says they have a cure for you, getting a hold of that cure, and going after the company who messed me up in the first place would probably be on my to-do list.

That's not the sum of Genesis' primary motivations though, personally living out the Loveless poem is just as much, if not a far greater priority for him. And I really can't see why he's so invested in it. And I don't think it's fair to say Genesis has more of reaction then Sephiroth. They both mentally broke down right away, but Sephiroth got killed right after that because he's too powerful to just let be for while. Genesis needs the men, needs Angeal and Lazard on his side to really get anything done. Mostly because Sephiroth and Angeal exist to oppose him in the first place.
 

Skan

Pro Adventurer
AKA
dief
I don't think it was so much living out the Loveless poem as it was that he was using it to ... make sense of his life when it no longer really made sense to him, at least initially. I mean, we do know that he didn't even turn his attention towards reenacting it until everything went to hell, Sephiroth died, and he no longer seemed to have a cure on hand, in which case it was just serving as the last actions of a desperate man. (I am not sure if he himself was even convinced it would work.)

I also don't think Genesis broke down right away -- for one, he seethed and sulked and sat on his shoulder injury for months before acting -- and I'm not even sure he "mentally broke down" (except, perhaps, at the end there, but hilariously enough, he was right). Granted, we don't get much of what he was like before CC, but his actions in CC do make sense given his character type.
 
Last edited:

Roger

He/him
AKA
Minato
I thought living out Loveless was his means to achieving what he wanted (a cure for degradation etc)
Initially he thought he just needed Angeals cell's, then Jenova's, then Sephiroth's then Zack's and then Cloud's. And he talks of Jenova as monster, hardly a goddess.

I don't think it was so much living out the Loveless poem as it was that he was using it to ... make sense of his life when it no longer really made sense to him, at least initially. I mean, we do know that he didn't even turn his attention towards reenacting it until everything went to hell, Sephiroth died, and he no longer seemed to have a cure on hand, in which case it was just serving as the last actions of a desperate man. (I am not sure if he himself was even convinced it would work.)

We know he was obsessing over Loveless long before the shoulder wound. By game start he almost exclusively talking about it.

I also don't think Genesis broke down right away -- for one, he seethed and sulked and sat on his shoulder injury for months before acting -- and I'm not even sure he "mentally broke down" (except, perhaps, at the end there, but hilariously enough, he was right). Granted, we don't get much of what he was like before CC, but his actions in CC do make sense given his character type.

Well we hardly know when exactly Hollander told him why his treatments aren't going so well, and who did it tp him. And he was talking about destroying the world in Modeoheim, hardly at the end. Again, unlike Sephiroth he needed help destroying the world and thus needed to be outwardly cordial. Even if he sucked at that.
 

Skan

Pro Adventurer
AKA
dief
One can easily obsess about something without being interested in personally living it out though, which is what you said in your initial post and which is what I'm disputing.

I also think one can want to destroy the world without having "mentally broken down." As I said, I think it's a very logical extension of his character to want to destroy the world upon discovering what was done to him as a child: he's obviously selfish and accustomed to having control over his own future; having that control taken away from him even before he was aware of it is one of the biggest fuck-you's anyone could've given him, especially given how hard he worked to get to where he is (only to never get quite there), so why not go ballistic? He can no longer control if he dies, all he can control is how he dies (do I wanna go down screaming or not?). I don't doubt that there is also a bit of "I don't want to be forgotten" in his motives as well, as legacies and the lack thereof are ideas that the Compilation plays with. Ironically, of course, he does end up being forgotten anyways.

And then you compare that with Sephiroth, who up until Nibelheim doesn't seem to give two shits about his humanity, doesn't seem to think much about "purpose," and all of a sudden goes off the handle. That is "mentally breaking," because that is a total 180 in terms of behavior.

I guess our difference in opinion is that I think Genesis acts in a way that is consistent with what little we get about him before CC, so I don't see any evidence of "breaking," just extremism, but extremism that is nevertheless consistent with his character. (The caveat being, of course, that we don't entirely know what he was like prior to CC.) You can, of course, read him the other way, because there's so little evidence of what he was like before, but that's just how I see him.
 

Roger

He/him
AKA
Minato
And then you compare that with Sephiroth, who up until Nibelheim doesn't seem to give two shits about his humanity, doesn't seem to think much about "purpose," and all of a sudden goes off the handle. That is "mentally breaking," because that is a total 180 in terms of behavior.

Sephiroth said he had always thought he was different from the other children. That he knew it was a special existence. I wouldn't call coming to the conclusion that he was the Chosen One a 180 from that outlook. And later on when he discovered he wasn't really an Ancient either but rather spawned from an alien, he again embraced it as something that made him more worthy then the rest. He flipped out in the Mako Reactor when it seemed he was just a monster but he eventually arrived at mostly the same conclusions he always had. Except that this time what made him special also made him humankind's enemy.

Genesis almost killed the guy that he thought was able to save him and then turned around and saved him with his own cells. And may have done so earlier at Modeoheim if Zack hadn't rushed to Hollander's defense. Genesis doesn't cope any better.

I dunno why we should think Sephiroth previously didn't give two ****s about his own humanity. He thought he was special but human, perfectly understandable. If every really strong person in final Fantasy angsted over his own humanity we'd never hear the end of it.
 

Joker

We have come to terms
AKA
Godot
So I have a question regarding parent/child relationships in fiction.

Which hits you harder emotionally: a child being taken from their parent and raised to love the thing they came to hate (and as a result, forget and hate their parent), or the above with the addition of the child actively fighting against the parent?

Modern day example: child being taken by and developing a love for [insert name of terrorist organization here], or the above plus [child decides to actively become member of terrorist organization and trying to kill their parent]?
 

Octo

KULT OF KERMITU
AKA
Octo, Octorawk, Clarky Cat, Kissmammal2000
Probably the latter. I guess if you're willing to kill someone is there really any way back from that?
 

Skan

Pro Adventurer
AKA
dief
Sephiroth said he had always thought he was different from the other children. That he knew it was a special existence. I wouldn't call coming to the conclusion that he was the Chosen One a 180 from that outlook. And later on when he discovered he wasn't really an Ancient either but rather spawned from an alien, he again embraced it as something that made him more worthy then the rest. He flipped out in the Mako Reactor when it seemed he was just a monster but he eventually arrived at mostly the same conclusions he always had. Except that this time what made him special also made him humankind's enemy.

Genesis almost killed the guy that he thought was able to save him and then turned around and saved him with his own cells. And may have done so earlier at Modeoheim if Zack hadn't rushed to Hollander's defense. Genesis doesn't cope any better.

I dunno why we should think Sephiroth previously didn't give two ****s about his own humanity. He thought he was special but human, perfectly understandable. If every really strong person in final Fantasy angsted over his own humanity we'd never hear the end of it.
See my comment above: "who up until Nibelheim doesn't seem to give two shits about his humanity..." Prior to Nibelheim, he never displays any sort of opinion about his own function or nature, until he's actually confronted with it (thinking about Elfe, I am astonished he has not thought of it before, but that's the impression I get from their meeting). Do I think he gives a shit? Of course I do, because he did actually go insane. But up until then he didn't display any sort of insecurities about it. CC got away with it because the later incident was already established, and so all they had to do was kinda sorta sketch around it, and people would try to fill in the gaps for them, no matter how little we actually get from Sephiroth in the game.

(On the same note, people actually still criticize FF8 for this very sort of turn-about concerning Squall and his relationship with Rinoa, when it was actually far better displayed than Sephiroth's turn-about. Some of it is simply because of the characters -- Sephiroth fronts extraordinarily well (or so I have to believe to explain his behavior), and Squall is damned good at self-denial, right up until he decides to cross a transcontinental bridge. That doesn't really change the fact that it's still kind of bad writing, and CC gets away with just because it's a landmark event that was established in the OGC. Squall, on the other hand, doesn't nearly get enough slack for it.)

I would also add that a couple acts of anger do not a "mentally broken" man make, esp. given that (1) degradation has been confirmed to render its victims more prone to outbursts of anger, and (2) up until that moment, Genesis seems to have been pretty restrained with himself, considering the circumstances. Second of all, I actually found Genesis killing Hollander (or trying to) a pretty good call on his part. Whether or not it resulted in anything, it's clear Hollander hasn't been able to do anything worthwhile for years (5+?), and thus, it was time to give him an extra incentive. Infecting him with G-cells would force him to focus on the cure for fear of his own life as opposed to stringing Genesis along for as long as possible to get revenge against ShinRa. Twisted? Yeah, sure. Effective? Not in this particular case, perhaps because Hollander's an incompetent moron, but you can't say it was a horrible decision. Maybe it started off as a simple fit of anger, but then Genesis realized halfway through that "curing" him with G-cells would fit "better" with his own plan, esp. since Hollander would no longer be holding the leash.

(ETA: Minato, I'd be glad to continue this discussion over PMs or over visitor messages or whatever you like, but I figure I should stop derailing this thread on a discussion about ~Everyone's Favorite Villain~.)

(ETA 2: Sorry, I will stop soon, but one last thing ... there are a lot of ways to read Genesis's character, and I'm not saying your interpretation of him is wrong.I can, however, put forth evidence of him being relatively sane -- as sane as he ever is, at least -- and I can say that I like to read him that way not because it makes him "mentally tougher" than his friends, but because I think it's harder on characters when they don't have the chance to make excuses for themselves. Otherwise, you get into that irritating territory where characters who've done bad things get a pass or think they get a pass on their behavior because, "It was a tough time for me, I wasn't really myself." Just look at how Sephiroth is treated in fandom, for instance. It's the exact same reason why I don't like the idea that Seifer was possessed in FF8, because in some ways, it's way meaner to make them face the fact that they did bad things, and it is all on them. Nobody was making them do these things, they wanted to do them, and dammit, they did.)

---

@ Davos: I usually find the actual writing to be more emotionally impacting than situations. That said, I think there's more fodder in the second. Bonus points if they know that it's their parent they're trying to kill, since it makes for more character material.
 
Last edited:
See my comment above: "who up until Nibelheim doesn't seem to give two shits about his humanity..." Prior to Nibelheim, he never displays any sort of opinion about his own function or nature, until he's actually confronted with it (thinking about Elfe, I am astonished he has not thought of it before, but that's the impression I get from their meeting).

To be fair, we don't see anything of Sephiroth in the OG prior to Nibelheim. In the OG, the earliest point at which we encounter him, chronologically speaking (I mean, the earliest point on the timeline) is when he's driving in the truck to Nibelheim with Zack and Cloud and that other poor nameless sod who fell off the bridge and was never seen again. So he really didn't get much chance to demonstrate his feelings about his own function and nature. Also, all we ever see of him is through Cloud's POV so again, not much chance for him to be pondering the nature of his humanity. Prior to losing his marbles he comes across as a reserved, no-nonsense kind of guy who wears his greatness lightly and is not above showing kindness to the lesser people. That's about all we see of him before he snaps.

Since the shock of discovering that he's "not human gasp horror" drove him insane, he was probably like most people who just assume that they're human because why would you even question it?

I'm not explaining myself very well, but what I'm trying to say is that Sephiroth's attitude to himself before Nibelheim wasn't an issue in the OG, and since they didn't feel a need to tell us about it, I think we can be confident that he took it for granted he was human like everyone else.
 

Skan

Pro Adventurer
AKA
dief
^ Yeah, but they had a chance to expand upon it in CC but didn't take that opportunity before the Nibelheim mission. They were fixed re: the actual dialogue and events in Nibelheim (minus the Genesis retcon), but they had a lot of freedom in the writing prior to Nibelheim.

I do not deny that some of it is simply my huge dissatisfaction over how "humanity" is treated in FF7, where not being genetically 100% human is apparently bad enough to break a lot of characters.
 
Top Bottom