I mean, do we though? Or is that just what industry people *think* we think? I don't know a single person who is graphics-first, especially when it comes to RPGs.
Of course most people don't conceive of themselves as judging games on graphics first. Despite that though, I think a size-able portion of the current gaming population do whether they think they do or not.
It's just confused in a layer of rationalization going something along the line of "It's not like a judge games primarily on graphics because I play plenty of games that don't have current gen top-level graphics - it's just that
this particular game looks exceptionally shit!"
Sometimes that might be a merited stance - I mean, we get a metric shit-ton of games each year, so if you're going to waste time playing one - why not waste it on one that has both good graphics, good game-play, good story and good music, instead of one that only has one or a few of these?
That being said - I'm not necessarily convinced that the overall quality of games except in terms of production value have changed that much, and I've seen tons of comments on youtube and gaming sites to the effect that the people posting "can't play" games earlier than the PS3, or the PS2 era because they look "too ugly".
I see people taking dumps on the original FFVII's graphics rutinely - which I think, despite the fact that they're dated, still has enormous aesthetic value.
I see people ragging on this and that, complaining about the nintendo system's outdated hardware, bla bla bla...
So, I do definitely get the impression that there's a large demographic of gaming troglodytes, who probably didn't start gaming until somewhere around 2005 or later, and are so shot in the head from all the "next gen OMFG AWESOME HD 4K CRYSIS ON CRACK LOOOK AT THE RES ON THAT SKY-BOX MUTHAFUCKAAAA"-marketing that they truly cannot loot at games predating the PS2(or PS3) without having juvenile and intellectually stunted reactions to it.
Now, I can honestly say for myself - I'd still play a game that looked like FFVII if it was released today.
In fact, I've routinely done so for almost all my time gaming since as a European there were tons of Jrpgs that never made it over from Japan, or the states, which I then had to play years later on emulators.
It didn't bother me in the slightest.
As far as I'm concerned, purely in terms of aesthetics, games like Suikoden 2 and FFIX, with their strong art-direction are still more pleasing to the eye to me than most current gen high fidelity games with their tired and boring attempts at"photo-realism", where most of the textures look like their made of plastic, and there's always a 10-20% lower value on the saturation than there ought to be, where all the colors are dreadfully boring and blending into each-other in such a way that it's nearly impossible to spot objects of importance unless they're given glowing fucking outlines.
Simply put - for example, I'd rather play an FF game that plays like a PSX era FF game and looks like a PSX era FF game, than play an FF game that has next-gen super graphics but plays like Assassin's Creed.
I get a distinct feeling that I'm in a minority in that though, because saying anything to the essence of the above immediately leads to a bunch of salty and butt-hurt FPS-counting douche-bags claiming that's just nostalgia or elitism speaking.