The Twilight Mexican
Ex-SeeD-ingly good
- AKA
- TresDias
All they need do is render it as they did in the original, because the ambiguity is built in.Well in the case of Rufus it was very coherent, which made AC incoherent for bringing him back. I will admit, it isn't really necessary to underline the point, bold it, and have an exclamation point after it....but I don't want them making it ambiguous either, for the sake of maybe bringing him back.
Even in the original, you can see his reflection on his desk after he's disappeared from sight in the explosion -- it almost looks like he's been blasted backwards over the desk. The explanation about his survival ended up describing things precisely as that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0599e/0599e51cd623538dfec1b99ea3543b21961bb2a5" alt="Cookie Monster :monster: :monster:"
Corneo was still severely injured and permanently crippled by it, though, and he was at least put to good use in "The Kids Are Alright."Speaking of "bringing him back": wasn't also Don Corneo alive in one of the novellas, despite falling to his death in Wutai?
Rufus surviving can make sense with that secret door in the floor narrative, even if unlikely. But the Don? That one bothers me.