On the one side, I enjoyed it, great visuals and intense action sequences, geeky sci-fi (although for some reason they made some of the computer graphics look from the 80's, not sure why), and gore. Not as much gore as District 9 (no teeth or nails falling out either), but still. And it has Copley, who puts down a solid role of homeless/commando/hardass seeking world domination/whatever the fuck he's supposed to be doing,
. Can't take his role too seriously due to the accent though. It amuses me,
.
The bad parts are the overly dramatic (and dramatically shot) bits; the completely ball-less female nurse protagonist with her OH NOES SICK DAUGHTER (how stereotypical can you get?), the male protagonist whose motivations seem unclear (I know he's dying, but besides that... seems to be important bits missing from his story / personality / character), repetitive slow-motion flashbacks to old nuns and shit, etc.
But the biggest gripe I have is the basic premise of the movie; rich peoples are cocks, and there's free and instant and magic health care available, but the poor ones (who, given the size and cleanliness of houses and shit don't seem /that/ poor to me. Had the same feeling in erm. some other sci fi movie earlier this year, forgot the name.) don't get it 'cause they're poor. Even if it's free and instant and can easily be scaled to mass-production. Doesn't cost much energy either given how they have a billion of them in shuttles ready to be dispatched. It tries to portray the message that rich people are complete and utter dicks, and/or that humans in general are, which (obviously) is incorrect.
So yeah. 50/50.
+ action sequences
+ gore
+ awesomeness
- characters & motivation, besides Copley who pwns for purely shallow reasons
- Disgusting/sickening attempted heart-string-pluckery. Compensated with grenade to the face.
- Flawed basic premise.