Final Fantasy: Spirits Within
I wanted to see if it was as bad as I remembered.
Man I seem to be like one of three people I know of on this planet who enjoyed it ;-;
OT: The Rock was on last night. Say what you will about Michael Bay and his current ego on a pedestal, The Rock is one of the best action films.
Ever. It seems to have aged well even after fifteen years since its release, and is proof that once upon a time Michael Bay could direct well-tempered, visually spectacular films while still having a plot with some down-to-earth emotion involved. The last Michael Bay film I found with even half that much substance was The Island.
There's something about the way Nicholas Cage and Sean Connery form their team dynamic. Although it's a typical cliche of science nerd teaming up with grizzled muscle, it's heartening to see something more complex than that. Cage brings his necessary trademark of suddenly emphasising words in his sentence, and although his character is on the rookie side of inexperienced, he smooth-talks his way through everything and does know how to handle a firearm. Connery, well: he's really just Big Boss, except he's British and he's been locked up for stealing secrets that are the answer to all the American conspiracy theories for the past half century (read: 1945 to the 2000s). Okay, maybe he's not Big Boss
. Connery approaches the role with the right amount of cynicism and humour - aside from being locked up for most of his life, he isn't even obligated to help the U.S Government in breaking into Alcatraz. He's
British. He's really only doing it for his daughter, who's in a target area of the missiles the villains have stolen.
The antagonists are also cliches, although they're more relatable than most action movie villains. Ed Harris does a fantastic job as Hummel. The character himself can actually be sympathised with. He's got a whole drawer of war decorations and medals before and since Vietnam. He commands respect even in the new age of military command. In fact, he is not inherently evil, as Mason points out: he's really just a disillusioned soldier. Some of the best antagonists are the ones doing what they do for understandable reasons: General Hummel takes that up a notch by doing what he does for wholly sympathetic ones. He's led men on clandestine operations that his government denied, the men who have died on those operations had families who were not told the truth, and were not given the proper reparations. By the audience's knowledge, Hummel should have every right to be angry after 20 years of this.
However, it comes to a delicious Mexican standoff when some of his subordinates are not as honorable as he is, and by that point he comes off more as a tragic figure than as a straight-out villain.
Overall, it is the characters that actually drive this movie, and it's nice to see them do it rather than let the gunfights and explosions do all the work. Like I said, in my opinion one of the best action films.