I felt like the director of the movie took one look at this part of the screenplay:
INT: Battleship. Slow pan over shocked crewmen and close in as CAPTAIN dramatically lowers binoculars.
CAPTAIN
God help us all
and thought to himself "Jesus fucking hell! No one can save these lines. So we might as well go all the way and cast Michael Ironside!" I felt like I got trolled so hard in that climax. You can't cast Ironside in a bit role and not have me instantly laugh.
Also, Beast looked ridiculous. Like, they CG'ed Hank's feet and the transformation, but when it came time to render the minute and a half of Beast-screentime, they said "Fuck it, let's get a 1980s makeup artist in here!"
Lastly, a small gripe I have about Erik: I found that his revenge quest certainly made it a better movie in general, it created a nice dramatic arc and raised the stakes concerning the villain and the strain on Erik and Charles's friendship. And the guy playing him gave a tight performance. But it kind of made Erik act as a sort of Proto-Wolverine in the movie. I'm glad the "Is he gonna leave?" subplot resolved itself in about ten seconds, but those aren't the important questions anymore.
X-Men has always been my favourite comic because it lies on the crux of a philosophical argument in which both sides have a very valid point. The basic conflict of any
X-Men movie should address the argument with respect and dignity. And in a movie about Charles and Erik, (the kings on the chess board) the theme has to be personified by these two very similar men.
In
First Class, they're too different. Erik's revenge-quest and his Wolverine-ness undermined the intelligence and clear-headedness that made his argument so compelling. It also put a bit of strain on the Charles-vs-Erik stuff because it seemed like the movie was going for a Brain-vs-Brawn feel, instead of giving Erik some credit. Still a worthy topic for a movie, but it's still not as sophisticated as the comics.