Oh wait, so now suddenly dolphins aren't literal? Are you starting to realise how absurd your argument is again?
[Dacon edited his post so this doesn't make sense now]
I will leave you with that then
edit actually, from here on in, note that Dacon has changed his opinion and is worming around what he has said and in the past. To all these "I never said or meant that" come backs, all I need do is this:
Dacon, you need to separate what happens in battle with what happens in story a lot of the time.
and his response:
No I don't. AC made it clear that most everything in battle can easily be translated to actuality.
As usual, when the argument is lost, claim you never made the argument, or that the points aren't being addressed, or go and edit a post to make it look like you didn't change your opinion at all. Not working. I didn't say "all of the time" I said "a lot of the time" and HE DISAGREED and made the argument that battles should be interpreted as CANON.
For all Dacon's claims that he was not arguing with the premise that pretty much everything in battle is canon, his own responses make it clear that he was. So he can piss and moan and jump up and down, but the responses are here to see. Dacon was the one claiming that ridiculous battle scenes should be interpreted as part of story (because Advent Children did it), and then he claimed that certain things weren't to be interpreted, and so he is simply doing what I do, picking and choosing what he will accept to be true in battle, which is the thing HE DISAGREED WITH ME ON. Is that confusing? He bluntly states that he disagrees with my above statement but left enough ambiguity in his post that he could later pretend that he didn't mean what he did, which is a common tactic I keep seeing in my time here. Leaving slight abiguity in your posts just so you can later claim that you have been misinterpreted is desperate.
These people really are achieving feats of ridiculous proportion and fighting massive creatures. Obv some are there for jokes,
So now Dacon places in a line of ambiguity "some are there for jokes" , which is completely at odds with: "
No I don't. AC made it clear that most everything in battle can easily be translated to actuality. "
He is literally taking the main feats shown in the battles as CANON
These people really are achieving feats of ridiculous proportion
and as LITERAL, which is what I object to. The battles should not be taken that literally, because they are intended for THE GAMER and not the story. If a cutscene works by Tifa being almost killed in 1 slash, but in battles she can be repeatedly slashed and still be OK, that is CLEARLY not how a battle should be viewed. It is bloody well mind bogglingly simple premise here. What happens in battles is often required or the game would be fucking shit.
Laughably, in the past his own argument has been that Rufus really did shoot Cloud in the chest with a shot gun shell. Arguing over whether hell house is real or not isn't really the point I was making and I think even a moron can see that. The point I made was clear, that lots of stuff that happens in battle, even mundane things like shot gun impacts, can't be taken as literally story. It was THIS he objected to, as he has done in the past. I used the hell house and dolphin analogy to show 100% why battles and story are somewhat separated largely at times.
His whole argument consists of believing that a lot of equally ridiculous things which happen in battle are acceptable because certain things happened in AC which IS A SEQUEL and NOT the original story. I find it difficult to grasp what people can't understand about that. It is possible for a sequel or remake to shit all over the original story and go against it. Just because a writer retcons and wrecks their own work, does not make it OK or change the original story and physics. If we all thought that, there would be no fuckin point watching fiction. None of it could be accepted.
Dacon's opinion is that Rufus survived a fire ball even though FF7 made clear he did not. Just because AC said "oh it's now possible for a NORMAL HUMAN to survive being burned alive" or that Cloud can now fly into walls and not have any injuries at all because AC says so, does not mean that these story elements are workable. I find myself amused and scared that my simple logical argument is so readily rounded upon on this forum and that something so basic and simple, which should be accepted as obvious, is even being debated. It defies words. It isn't even FF7 we are debating here, it is the most basic understanding of storytelling and fiction.
It is more of a problem when such bogus posts get heaps of thanks, because that demonstrates that those people can't understand this either. That's a lot of people. FF7 worked because for the most part people were able to suspend disbelief (apart from mainly Cait Sith) of things that were happening, and project themselves into the game. When Aerith was stabbed, the dramatic impact of the scene was great because it was realistic. It was realistic to see a flesh based being die from that. The same way that falling off a bridge rendered Tifa unconscious.
AC came along and threw all this in the trash can, and people like Dacon are the problem. They accept Cloud being thrown into walls at huge speeds without ANY injuries blindly, and have no concept or understanding of why that is wrong and why original FF7 worked on so many levels. It wasn't always Shakespeare, and it wasn't always perfect, but as a fiction it was very well made. AC on the other hand, wasn't, because it reduced the story to a mess where anything is possible and where all dramatic tension is lost.
It is also important to realise that a lot of fiction is based on the real world and has Humans or flesh based creatures in it. In those circumstances the writers have placed a limitation on how far they can stretch logic and how often. FF7 does not go too far too often, that's why it works. The prequels and sequels do. I understand Advent Children had to be entertaining, but that does not mean defying the physics of its own world. What Dacon cannot grasp in the slightest is that just because something happens in AC or even the original game at times, that does not mean you can blindly accept it. If the rules and physics are heavily based on OUR world, then that writing cannot go too far that it blatantly breaks those rules . Dacon would have you believe that just because Cloud cannot float onto a ledge in FF7 but can in Advent Children, that the planet's own gravity which was set up in the original game and adhered to, no longer exists in the same way. That now canon dictates that Gravity is completely different; this simply does not work.
Dacon, like so many, does not realise the basic limitations of fiction and good storytelling, and thinks that whatever the writers say, is the gospel truth, no matter how much they are going against their original work or the basic laws of physics. Advent Children had a good opportunity to show how different Gameplay and Story are, but it tried to incorporate gameplay elements (like fighting huge monsters single handedly and flying 50m in the air) INTO the live action main story and the result is a laughable farce that no one can remotely suspend disbelief to. The result of AC is that it is a failure of fiction. The same elements that can be ignored in the original game because it IS A GAME, cannot be ignored when you see the characters defying physics and logic as PART OF THE MAIN STORY. If the AC writers had been smart they would have limited the out of control fight scenes and ridiculous feats of impossibility, and stuck to sane level headed storytelling. Instead they appeased fanboys like Dacon, with dazzling, useless, overlong, unrealistic, laughable fight sequences.
All this can be summed up by: Movies and Games are not the same thing. Game stories HAVE to work around gameplay elements inside a game, movies do not and should not, as real life is not played like a game. In other words, trying to make your fucking movie play out like it is a fucking game is retarded! OBVIOUS.
Now we can understand why so many bad movies get rave reviews for their story... it is because so many people haven't got a fucking clue what a good story is.
The same thing happened in the Star Wars prequels, and the Matrix sequels. This is fucking basic stuff that people need to know, because if people carry on accepting any old shit that is fired out of the games industry or Hollywood, nothing will get better, only worse!
edit 2:
It is also interesting to see how emotional and worked up Dacon is over this game. His posts and that of others here seem to be nothing but hate filled, insult strewn tirades, because they cannot debate properly. What is really sad is that this behaviour appears to be the norm on this forum, and is actually congratulated.... oh, well... as long as it is a Mod doing it, that is.
What kind of forum actually allows a moderator to act in such a way? And what kind of moron actually thinks normal people looking at this thread are going to think he is clever or anything other than a fanboy who can't tolerate that he is wrong about a number of things. Dacon is very interesting actually; on one hand he demands respect and on the other he abuses people. He asked me why I wasn't respecting his opinion and the answer is as plain as day in this very thread. The reason people like Dacon aren't to be taken seriously is because they only pretend that they are listening. All people like the ignorant man above are about is inflicting their views on people regardless of any lack of credibility those views have.
Anyone intelligent who reads this (well, in the future perhaps because Dacon [probably] has actually hidden all my posts and threads here at tls haha, that's how sad he is!) will only conclude that Dacon cannot debate and is a juvenile idiot who has absolutely no concept of what good fiction is.
It is a shame that forums are infested by people so lacking in intelligence, as Dacon.