MasterMoogle
Pro Adventurer
Certainly how most folks would describe the death of a friend.
I must be in some special kind of a mood this morning, because I can't ignore this irrelevant, diminishing observation this time. I have twice experienced sudden, harsh, unfair circumstance cutting short the potential of something new and exciting after only three-ish weeks, and I still carry them with me every day, five and two years later respectively. So whatever other "Clerithy" notions aside, I know full well the versimilitude of the notion under the microscope here.
You underestimate the private emotional resonance of new relationship energy combined with a lack of closure. It's like a moment frozen in time inside you, where the natural way of things is that they change with time. Since this can't, though, you're left with an unmoving iceberg on the sea of your own psychological continuity.
... "Koibito"?
There absolutely is. For examples of bad faith, see: character assassination; selective acknowledgement; or, as is most relevant to the current state of the discussion, engaging in the LTD while claiming that the "L" doesn't apply to one of the participant's feelings.
Putting aside whether it's romantic, he fulfills her request to get her out of the church and later rereferences being her bodyguard himself. He absolutely agreed.
Kitase: "And having two heroines, Aerith and Tifa, and having the hero waver between them, at the time that was something new."
1) I was talking about from the perspective of the audience and the LTD.
2) Generally not a good idea to bring up personal anecdotes during a debate. It invites drama. I'll simply respond with Cloud's guilt does not equate to love. Although it wouldn't surprise me if Cloud and/or the audience confuses his guilt for romantic love. It never occurs to people, but it can actually be the "lack of closure" which is generating the emotions, not the actual memories of the person. That's not a comment on your anecdote.
3) Cloud was never Aerith's "koibito" in that sense, and Nojima probably didn't mean it as such.
4) All these things are worth debating.
5) Yes, Cloud cares for her safety. That's not being disputed.
6) Would Cloud be wavering between them if he didn't have memory issues? I'm sorry, but you can't compare what Cloud and Aerith have to all the history between Cloud and Tifa. This is made evident by the Gold Saucer date between Cloud and Aerith.
There's a lot of misunderstanding regarding Aerith's role in Cloud's story. Disregarding her role in the overarching story, her role in Cloud's story is simply to function as a source of guilt. She's not there to "open him up." The memories they share are not relevant to Cloud's story, nor are they the source of Cloud's emotions for her. Cloud never mentions their Gold Saucer date. Cloud never mentions their time traveling together. The only thing Cloud ever references is her sacrifice and his failure to save her.
I must suck at explaining things, and I apologise for that, but the continuity of "I'm coming for you" *Aerith is happy Cloud is coming for her*> "You came for me" "Yep" *Cloud and Aerith are having a moment* *the focus is on them* *the moment continues** *Aerith is happy* *Aerith skips forward to Cloud* *they are interrupted* *focus shifts to the group* is still something that was intentional. If anything FFVIIR expands on "Cloud … so you did come for me …" from the OG as far as Hojo's room is concerned.
Wrong. Skip to 1:10. The focus is on both Cloud and Tifa, and then the focus shifts to Tifa. In fact, she's not even specifically talking to Cloud when she says "you came for me."
Last edited: