My comp ate my post, this is much shorter:
@ KH
Clotis have been talking about the lack of romance in KH long before KH2, when the Clerii still insisted that this AU was a Cleris sanctuary of awesomelove.
With the advent of the second installment, the Clerii had a lot of backpedaling to do, especially since the presence of the two (C & A) was pretty much all they had to go on to begin with. Not only had the big-boobed one invaded their pink space, she was the embodiment fo Cloud's light and also the only one involved in the fight squaring off against the embodiment of his darkness, as well as the only one associated with his quest for the light and the whole shebang.
It's not a case of Clotis going "KH MATTERS NOW!!11" as you try (in vain) to make it seem. It is a case of us saying that "no, you were wrong, you continue to be wrong (such as the multiple lights bullshit) and this is WHY you're wrong".
Don't be butthurt because KH took your pink dreams and shat all over them. It's simply that even AUs fail to see the pink light. Discussions about KH2 have not revolved around the relevancy of KH, but more so the erroneous assumption that Cloud and Aeris share anythign romantic within that game. It became "a big deal" as you say precisely because the
absence of Tifa had been taken as a cementing of the fact SE did not care for C/T and that it never existed. So when SE reveal that Tifa didn't make it due to time constraints and proceed to make her an integral part of Cloud's story, it is just downright hilarious.
So really, the fact that we pointed out the Clerii dreams seem to be nonsense does not in any way make us flip-floppers. Bullshit is bullshit no matter how much you stir and you're gonna be called on it.
on to koibito...
but the official version uses a word implying a relationship.
Mutual is a part of the definition.
I love how context is suddenly so relevant
Context has always been relevant, we were the ones screaming CONTEXT while Clerii plugged their ears and sang "lalala LOOOVE".
The fact that you do not grasp (or refuse to as then you would have no leg to stand on) the simple fact that context dictates meaning is what is embarrassing, and not as you said, the squabbles over koibito.
That has never changed.
For you to say that koibito in CoL in context of Aeris expressing
her feelings for someone and for Nomura expressing a factual statement outsite the universe = the same as taking the English word 'sweetheart' and assigning the same meaning to it whether I say "Jane is a sweetheart" or "Jane is Joe's sweetheart". Are we to assign the same meaning because it's the same word being used for both?
If we refuse to hold "sweetheart" to that standard, why do so for "koibito"?
The fact that the same word is used does not give you a golden ticket past the context gates.
And since you seem to have changed your tune from relationship to UNREALIZED POTENTIAL, then how is it that you still maintain the definition of "mutual relationship" applies? Either Cloud is her beloved, or Aeris declares herself the other partner of an unrealized couple, a part of a supposed relationship of which the other partner is not aware exists (even if he does harbor his own feelings).
Which is it exactly? You can't even make up your mind.
But as Ryu said, this is irrelevant. For either way, Nomura describes Tifa
as the one loved by Cloud and Aeris (in a novella that explores HER perspective) says Cloud
is loved by HER.
Guess which one holds more weight even if you fuck context. Ja.