When the member is someone like Brooke I would disagree.
A question about something which takes a good deal of effort sorting through all the pages of these threads to find the answer to, and which, if she knew the answer to, wouldn't have been asked.It's already been answered several times, which is why I didn't bother answering it again
A question about something which takes a good deal of effort sorting through all the pages of these threads to find the answer to, and which, if she knew the answer to, wouldn't have been asked.
Also, it probably doesn't really make members (Brooke, in this case) feel all that appreciated, does it?
When the member is someone like Brooke I would disagree.
Perhaps it was. However, several answers that should have clearly settled the matter had already been given, such as this one and this one. I guess it's my fault for assuming that people who had been continually thanking posts throughout the last several days would have actually read everything that had been posted on the matter (for example, Brooke had thanked a post two posts above the second response I linked to). Live and learn. In any case, I clearly answered the question the first time I saw it, and explained why I handled it the way I did, so I'm not sure why you're still bitching at me about it.So you didn't answer it because you had already answered it, didn't see it, has been posted at the top of every forum, AND figured someone else had answered it. All right, then.
If I had to hazard a guess, the question was asked because the continued talk about the whole deal made the answer unclear.
Well it's certainly how you're coming across to me.Also, I'm not bitching.
I haven't been asking questions, though. On the contrary, I've been answering them....people like you, as you admit that you haven't read the entire thread?
If you actually wanted to "try", you could start by admitting that you have at least some culpability for that "bad blood."Mog: attempt at deescalation failed due to bad blood; sorry, I tried ;.;
It has to do with the fact that you said you tried to de-escalate things with me. If you really wanted to de-escalate you would have considered following exactly the steps which I have repeatedly said would help things de-escalate. Your efforts do not come across as particularly sincere for exactly that reason.Which has what to do with the subject at hand?
Perhaps it would, but you seem to feel like picking fights with me in response to just about everything I say, and I've already made it plain that I'm not talking to you through any form of private communication until you admit your partial culpability for what happened. So that leaves the forum.I seem to recall there being some sentiments expressed many pages ago that this matter would be better settled in private, no?
Most of what you've directed at me today has come across as plain old aggressive.That said, you're wrong. I know exactly why you have a negative opinion of me. However, when I'm being hostile to someone, it doesn't involve being passive-aggressive - merely aggressive. On a scale of 1 to 10, my hostility level regarding everything that's happened since yesterday is about a 2.
I've heard it's not the only thing you're quick at.