My problem is that one side is trying to paint the other as a collectively manipulative and fanatic audience, using isolated instances of stupidity.
koi_bito is one thing, it was something people fought for, and something they dropped later on. Not only that, it was dragged into other debates and people were so hysterical they were accusing other translators as manipulative.
Hell, I'd even give the whole KH "light and dark" incident to you.
But rival orphanages, no. Saying, hey, there's one post on a clerith forum, and maybe another in a different forum =/= wide spread belief. I still think that if it were, I would have heard one, just one, instance of it. And it is idiotic to use it as the "pattern of ignorance" because all fans were ignorant at that point. It was speculation, a lot stupider shit was said during this time. ie, Sephiroth was the guy in the white cloak, Zack is the wolf, Jenova is really in control, Aerith is coming back to life!
No one expects a full apology for these speculations because everybody knows that fandom likes making wild theories during times where we have no real information, or limited information. When more information was given out, they understandably adjusted their theories.
You can argue that whatever side you want is the worst one or whatever. But using 1. a best guess 2. that is not widely shared, to help you paint that picture is dishonest.
EDIT:
Oh, I missed the fandom fallback D: