I dunno what you thought I was trying to say here but I was XDing the fact that she never came back... perhaps because of CoLW.
It seemed, given the trend of this thread at the moment and your current tack in it, that you were saying it was a one off.
I'm not allowed to expand upon what you say and offer more information? In other words, "I agree it was the one sided definition, but not with her being wrong."
You did a poor job of doing it. Especially since I was not saying she was wrong. I SAID we have a choice. I did not say she was wrong. I said we had a choice to see her as one or the other given the meanings. Your reaction started by saying she was not wrong or mistaken, which seemed to ignore the framing of such as a choice.
You're only talking about koibito here though, others swear up and down there was backpedaling over Kingdom Hearts from the Cloti side. I guess I thought you meant "our backpedals aren't as bad as theirs" and to me that seems kinda ... strange XD
The argument re:KH is the same before and after KH2- AUs really don't count. The reaction to KH2 was 'Hah, hoisted by your own petards, go cry some more.' Not 'KH2 actually proves Cloti, it counts, it counts!' While the internet has et records from that era, what remnants exist of the crew around here often include disclaimers along the lines of 'If it counts, then...'
And 'Our backpedals aren't as bad as theirs' is still a legitimate counter. Even if you count the Koibito mess as a backpedal, that's still an internal correction of a mistake of omission while preserving the overall whole as opposed to tossing out an entire existing argument structure used for four years and pretending it never existed.
The only way KH2 could really count as a backpedal would be to find people who A: thought KH1 did not count as far as AU but KH2 did (the notable exceptions made for stated parallels would not be sufficient here. You'd need to find someone unconditionally stating KH2 was commenting and/or defining the main continuity) or that Light was not automatically romantic in KH1 but was in KH2. You'll not find much of either, I expect. Not around here, anyways.
But if we must discuss the 'Cloti' Backpedal to KH2, then the Clerith Backpedal must be addressed.
And this is not to be a circle jerk, though it does seem like any LTD history lesson dealing with the rabids does trigger those cries.
In KH1, the argument is that Cloud was searching for his light. His light must be Aerith and this must have romantic connotations. This argument is flawed and makes several invalid assumptions, but that's neither here nor there. Come KH2, and the revelation that Tifa is Cloud's light. In addition to the denials that Tifa COULD be Cloud's light, there came hasty redefinitions of this argument to create the inner and outer light distinctions, so Aerith could be his inner light and Tifa his outer light.
Instead of admitting their logic was flawed, they did everything they could to avoid giving up their old argument.
By comparison, forgetting to mention an actual, existing definition of a word because it was so similar to other definitions and at the time redundant, that's not even in the same league.