It wasn't so much crying, but whining. That was maybe bad wording on my part.
Then please, do demonstrate in the narrative this whining.
I meant that it's what it's known for, because it's "suggestive." I don't think that's the reason it could be important. If you like those two, then it's very important to you. But some people only see that fade to black.
Then those people are missing that the scene itself holds risque dialogue, that the scene itself holds the content. The pan and fade merely leads to the conclusion of other things happening based on the fact that the dialogue as it exists is risque, but that is not risque on its own, that it must indicate some other action to be risque.
That doesn't make it okay.
It doesn't make you unduly persecuted either, which is my point. I've been called many terrible things both directly and as part of an aggregate in my time on the internet. It happens.
Then I misunderstood what responses you were referring to.
From what I saw, your first responses did get a couple of responses. I only popped in on the Aerbear hug one because I thought there was no need to address the earlier points.
The rebuttal was about the Highwind scene, mostly. And that's nothing new.
Not in the slightest. It contained a rebuttal to her argument about the highwind scene, but it also included a request to provide a positive case for the pairing, instead of relying on a negative case against the other pairing. Then came her C/Ped essay, which itself contained many examples of disingenuous arguments, including quote mining half of a sentence to prove a point.
She can't be expected to make perfect points. She's just giving her own. Nothing wrong with that.
She should, however, be expected not to make points which directly contradict her other points, or statements which disavow her own words.
My bad, OneWingedDemon! Sorry.
We know the canon ending is to bring Tidus back because of International + Last Mission - she's living with him, three months after X-2 ends.
As mentioned, this can change.
The same can't be said for the HA version. Nothing that happens after depends on the High Affection version. And just because the HA version is referenced the most and might be a favorite of the creators doesn't mean it's canon. If one of them came out and said they like Cloud and Aerith as a pairing the best, that wouldn't make Cloud and Aerith canon. It's all about the events in the story.
It is about the events in the story. And the HA version has been called one of the most important scenes of the that story, it's been said that feelings are shared that night, that feelings are shared if the AV is high, and the conversation is apathetic if they are low, that nothing is shared. It's been included in a story summary. We have more than sufficient information to conclude it happened as an event IN the story.
He's one creater. You said creators. Do the other ones like this scene?
They think it's one of the four most important scenes in the game.
He didn't write that scene.
I never said he did. I said he was head writer. That means he lays out the broad plan of the story and knows what the narrative will be. He was also the sole writer of the OTWTAS novellas and AC/C.
That makes it canon? Because that's what came to his mind first?
Not because it's what came to his mind first, but because to him, 'Highwind sequence' and 'scene with the risque dialogue' are synonymous.
If someone asked him about the optional characters in FFVII, and he said "Oh, you mean Vincent?" Would this mean it isn't canon to get Yuffie, because she wasn't mentioned? This is only hypothetical, but do you understand where I'm going?
Yes, I do, but it's a bit of a false analogy.
In your scenario, we're establishing that the automatic association between optional characters and Vincent, that Vincent is THE example of optional characters in the game. That's what stands out to him as a creator.
With the highwind sequence, a fellow creator asked him about the Highwind scene, and he immediately jumped to the version with Risque dialogue. That's THE example of that scene in his head.
My impression of her isn't in line with yours, but I didn't just come up with it. If that's how I see her, and that isn't how you see her, so be it.
Actually, no, I'm curious. I want to see this supported. If you didn't 'just come up with it' it should be supportable.
Then I didn't mean to fascinate you.
But you did.
This will turn into bashing and I don't want to do that here.
See, this I also find interesting. If it's a legitimate interpretation backed by facts, it wouldn't be bashing, yet you yourself describe it as such.
Still isn't quite what I meant, but I'm glad your mind is boggled. Boggle away.
I shall, while I wait for your explanation.
Sometimes, yes. Children have an amazing ability to cut through nonsense that keeps people from realizing the root of their problems. Cloud and Tifa's problems are not with each other, but problems each- mostly Cloud- face that act as obstacles in their relationship.
I'm aware. And you agree with my point in general. But you refuse to apply it here, which is odd to me.
I make sure of it but it happens anyway, because some people are born douchebags.
True, but there's a proverb about 'If you are called a donkey by one man, ignore it. If a second man calls you a donkey, take heed. If a third man calls you a donkey, search for a cart.'
While argumentum ad populum is a bad method for determining veracity, if enough people are having issue with what you say, make sure your case is strong.
We can assume she could be the personal memory because she is a part of their memories, including Clouds. Tifa is also associated with his memories because of their promise in the past and being her neighbor growing up. But neither is definite. He could be fighting for Zack or getting revenge for Nibelheim. He doesn't say.
Jessie could ALSO be the personal memory. It's not bloody likely, though. At some point you need to move into the realm of probability. Some things are simply more likely than other things, and someone rather ham-fistedly associated with Cloud's 'sealed up secret wish' and 'tender memories' is much more likely to be a personal memory than someone not referred to as such.
It's all about how you interpret the game. There is a way to view it where you will see what I see. But you see something else and that's okay.
Not all interpretations are valid. So, Again, I say "So prove it. No quote mines, no twisting quotes, no wild speculation, simple facts and logical conclusions from those facts." I'll add the logical principle of parsimony into the equation as well.
You said "Because Square Enix doesn't say it's up to the players." If you wish to imply the opposite, your punctuation needs correcting.
You misspoke. I seized upon it for my amusement and a counterpoint.
(Thank you, Sesc! I was looking for the original Japanese statements.)
Nothing to add to my points ABOUT those statements? Because they don't say what you said they said.
Excuse my sarcasm, then.
I was mostly being sarcastic.
But you were being sarcastic against a version of her points other than what she was actually expressing.
Anyway, I'm only saying that the High Affection and Low Affection versions of the Highwind scene don't affect any later event, from what we can see. And since there are two versions and they're optional, there's nothing to indicate which version canonically happens. I'm not going to believe it's canon just because there's nothing saying otherwise. That's a belief that belongs with "Well, you never said I couldn't take a giant dump on your lawn."
As I mentioned in a post after this one, by your logic, there is no canonical list of which party members ascended Kefka's tower and fought him. Affecting future events is not the only possible way to determine if something is canon or not. Knowing an outcome in a bivariable state is sufficient. If we know X happened, and X only happens if Y happens, then Y happens. We have sufficient quotes to demonstrate this is the case for the High Highwind scene and for Tina's expression of love for the children, or Shadow's potential death, and multiple other events. We know an outcome. Not how it affects later events, but that an outcome happened.
I didn't mean that the person Cloud goes to the Gold Saucer with is the person that he likes. I was saying that you said the date mechanics don't have an affect, but they also play a part in which Highwind version you get, and to you the High Affection one is canon, and the affection rating supposedly determines if you get that scene.
But the narrative importance of the scene is divorced from the mechanistic method of determining which scene was acquired, which is entirely the point.
I see her as being a bit negative.
Again, please provide examples of such.
Tifa was also a little mean to her after they met.
Aerith: "The deal was for one date, right?"
Tifa: ".........oh, I get it."
Aerith: "Tifa? Tifa, you're there too!"
Tifa: "EXCUSE me."
Jeez, Tifa!
Um, She's just been ignored in conversation. That's Aerith being mean if anyone.
In general though, I don't think Aerith means to hurt Tifa's feelings. They both just get jealous at some point.
We just see Cloud get better and know he's going to join his family/friends again. Romantically? In my opinion... I just don't see it.
Please, nobody shoot me. xD
Pistols at ten paces.
So you can't live with somebody you aren't going out with?
No. But she's living with a man who she canonically has romantic feelings for. And he would know she had them. He became aware of them a short time ago.
Nothing in either HW scene explains that. It isn't said that they'll live together in either one, with or without Barret, help take care of Marlene, etc.
Well, partly because that's irrelevant to the scene, and partly because the novella wouldn't be written for another decade. The point, I'm assuming, was the the positive
I think she means if Tifa's affection is as low as zero, Tifa won't really act on her feelings. So we won't know if Cloud likes her back, because that whole exchange only happens in the HA version, where her affection rating is needed!
Which MEANS that IF Tifa never acts on her feelings, she never confesses, thus no feelings are shared, thus that version DID NOT HAPPEN because FEELINGS ARE SHARED THAT NIGHT, PERIOD END OF.
This is like what I said earlier about not seeing the forest for the trees.
Incidentally, Tifa not acting on her feelings is A MATERIALLY different claim than a 'confirmation of mutual romantic disinterest.'
Watch those goalposts shift.
Or Yuna and Brother
Bad example. Brother has far more than cousinly feelings for Yuna.
She does connect, in Case of Tifa, a family of friends, so in calling them their friends, this could still mean to calling them family.
But the family of friends is a contrast to the current family, the 'real' family.
To be fair, any pro-C/T material is skyrocketed to Cybertron and anti-C/T or pro-C/A is ignored or passed off as guilt. When Cloud is said to have feelings, unspecified what they are, for Aerith and Tifa, it's generally assumed it's only romantic in Tifa's case, and only friendly in Aerith's. The word "feeling" never changes, so why do our opinions?
Tifa's Feelings are canonically romantic. Hence, mutual confirmation of those feelings includes romance.
Feelings FOR Aerith, meanwhile, have consistently been associated with Cloud's guilt over letting her die. He wants her forgiveness, she's the symbol of his guilt, etc. etc. etc.
My tiddlywinks are waiting.
Your tiddlywinks have been tiddlied.
Anastar, I have been informed by a very sexy spy that you ARE aware of the response to your essay. Please, do get on actually responding to the totality of my rebuttal.
I also have been told that you have rejected being included in a story summary as indicating the actual flow of events.
At this, I must simply conclude you have never been interested in determining the Truth, but protecting your own prefered version of events, because you've literally rejected a summary of the narrative as being an actual summary of my narrative.
I also note you used the phrase "in what you're calling Cloud's "office" to describe Cloud's office as if this was some invention of ours. It is not. The very text refers to it as Cloud's office on several occasions.
For the record, beds in offices are not unheard of. In my life, my father has had several home offices. Most of these have been guest bedrooms as well, including the one I sleep in when I am visiting my parents. That one has a Full or Queen Sized bed. It is still merely his office, and not where he sleeps. It even has an amoire and dressers, things which the office entirely lacks.
I do not expect you to respond, honestly. You seem to not want to respond to the points I am making. I will simply take this as indication of your fear of actually answering them honestly.
I may respond to Anastar's points later, but she seems determined to argue the party line rather than actually debate honestly.