I'm answering you tonight for two reasons, even though I have PMs from GLD, Quexinos, the Penguin, and Zealkin that I haven't answered yet.
Don't worry too much about me, Tres' posts are overall more in depth and well cited than mine, not to mention he can do his own translations as needed. I'd give his posts priority over mine, were I in your shoes.
1) You've said that you hate the time delay - well, the fact that I have so many people to respond to is the reason for the time delay.
This would make more sense if you were actually responding to more people, thus using up time. Here lately though you've just been replying to Tres, and doing that in bits and pieces. Again, I don't mind and I'm sure everyone else involved will wait for their posts as well, and it needs said that Tres has many times said that you can/should take the time you need to respond right.
What I usually do is answer the PMs from other people before responding to yours. 2) There's several issues in this PM that I'd like to address asap, such as my supposed "dishonesty".
Your dishonesty is not supposed. A goodly number of outright lies, half truths, and twisted/mined quotes were all archived not long ago showcasing said dishonesty.
And Quex said in PM that people don't like the blue I'm using for quotes. Sorry, I thought that helped. I will italicize quotes from now on.
I pointed it out in several of my PM's too, but glad someone got through to you. Thanks, italics alone are much better than sudden color switches.
First of all, my comment about not understanding women very well was meant lightheartedly, not offensively. I certainly don't understand men very well, either. Many people I know say they don't understand the opposite sex, but they say it lightheartedly and never offensively.
Try putting a
or
after such lighthearted statements, even if the statement is serious information presented in a lighthearted manner the cookie monster really helps people spot the lighthearted tone.
Now, as for the women you asked - you asked for their opinion on whether they thought that "waiting around" would indicate strength or weakness. What they gave you was their opinion. Your judgement on the matter is also opinion. My judgement on the matter is also opinion.
Now, I'd like to point out that two of the women you asked actually agreed with both of us:
"It takes strength to REALLY be okay with someone not loving you," and agreed with the above perspectives. Her mom had the most in-depth response, and said "Well, it does take great strength to wait around for someone, but is it self-defeating? To love someone who is emotionally unavailable would require patience, but is it because you deep down know that that person is unobtainable, so you really are not taking any risk?" ~from your post
Both acknowledge that it takes strength (agreeing with me), but go on to acknowledge that it's also self-defeating (agreeing with you). Your stepmother also went on to agree with me that it takes patience, but went on to agree with you by saying that it's not taking any risk. So they see my side as well as your side.
One of them said it takes strength to REALLY BE OKAY with someone not loving you. Being ok with someone not loving you =/= waiting around hoping they will. The other starts off agreeing that it can take a lot of strength to wait around, yes, and acknowledges the patience required, but then goes on to point out there is no real risk in this since you're not really taking action. Ergo, more strength is required to DO SOMETHING and change the situation, whether your actions are to try and gain their love or to simply walk away. Because once you do that, you're embracing risk. Now, I don't know any of these women Tres quoted here, but just looking at their words here it really looks like they are not agreeing fully with both sides.
TL;DR for my
opinions: It does require some strength of
will to hang on and hope for love, but it takes genuine strength of
character to see how self-defeating and weak this approach is and change it.
People don't always do what's best for them, do they? For example, abused women don't always get out of the situation they are in - some do, some don't. It's easy to stand on the outside and judge what would be best for someone else to do. Doesn't mean that everybody always does what's best for them.
No one will argue this I'm sure, people are, by definition, very good at doing things that are quite the opposite of good for them. But we're talking about [/I]specific[/I] people here, not people in general. We can see examples for both Cloud and Tifa making mistakes and doing the wrong thing for themselves, AND examples of them doing what is best for themselves and each other. Hell, there are times where a single choice they make is both. Good example, fighting the Shinra was good and right, and their downfall was best for the Planet and everyone on it. But Tifa did it for explicitly bad reasons, and the results were tons of guilt at her "sins." Had she and Barret not been so focused on revenge, maybe they'd have taken their plans a little more slowly and NOT killed a ton of innocent people during their bombings, eh?
In my post yesterday, I pointed out examples of several FF characters who are in pretty much the same situation.
And we pointed out, individually, how wrong you were about them.
Yuna doesn't move on from Tidus in FFX-2.
Instead she throws herself into sphere hunting, gets possible information on her lover from Khimari, and goes out hunting for MORE. She acts. She doesn't just sit and wait, hoping the situation will change. She bloody well changes it, and this leads directly to her getting Tidus back.
Vincent doesn't move on from Lucrecia.
Unless he did over the course of DoC, which I really can't claim with any certainty. Up until then at least, though, we all agree that YES, Vincent is weak as fuck. He locked himself in a damned coffin and just waited for decades. He daydreams about visiting his unrequited love in her crystal cavern but rarely if ever actually DOES SO despite the fact that she IS NOT DEAD. One of the best examples is in AC/C:
Cloud: Can sins... be forgiven?
Vince: I wouldn't know, I never tried.
NEVER TRIED! Vincent DOES just sit around and mope. He doesn't act to change his situation. Vincent might be strong as fuck physically, but emotionally he is weak.
Dyne doesn't move on from Eleanor.
And is quite explicitly insane and motivated by a desire to
kill absolutely everybody, everywhere. That includes
Marlene, his own daughter, once Barret informs him she is alive. This man does not fucking compare to the rest of the examples you tried to make at all.
There's also Shera when Avalanche first gets to Rocket Town in FFVII. She's living with Cid, who is emotionally distant from her and actually resents her for preventing his rocket from taking off - but Shera sticks around despite that. Cid eventually sees his mistake, and ends up marrying her.
Shera explained the reason she stuck around DURING THE GAME. She felt she owed the Captain her life, since he gave up his dream to save her. She was willing to take all of his abuse and scorn because she honestly thought she deserved it, if she was in love with him at the time she never once mentioned it. So yeah, that seems kind of weak, but she wasn't trying to change his mind or win him over. Just serving Cid in any way she could was the action she chose, because she felt she owed him a freaking life debt.
Note, as soon as Cid finds out she was RIGHT about oxygen tank #8, and that her sticking around probably saved his life thanks to the launch cancellation, he apologizes and treats her properly. That's when things change and they end up marrying.
From what you've said, you would most likely have told Shera to move on. Doesn't always happen, either in FF or in RL.
Gods know I would have told her exactly that, Cid was a colossus sized dick to the poor girl. It worked out in the end in this case, true, but without the rocket launch as the catalyst of change he'd have kept treating her like that forever. And she'd have kept taking it.
Okay, let's try writing it in first person:
It had been several months since that day—the chosen day. After helping Tifa and Cloud build our home, I entrusted my best friend Dyne's orphaned daughter Marlene to the two of them and embarked on a journey.
But it wasn't
written in first person. The text calls it Cloud and Tifa's home,
not Barret's. You have just dishonestly changed the tense, and the wording, to match what you want. Had it been written in first person, "After helping Tifa and Cloud build THEIR home, I entrusted" would be just as viable.
Of course it does, you have just made changes that allow it to say what you
want it to say. It is, as stated, dishonest as fuck. And it doesn't bloody matter, because the story WAS NOT written that way.
I'll just have to take your word for it.
You should, dude is pretty damn good at this.
Unless he just thought of it yesterday for the first time. "Just one more day" may be referring to the strength of his desire to find redemption, rather than how long he has been planning it.
"Just one more day" would tend to indicate that there were quite a few days before it most of the time. That's just how the phrase is used in the majority of circumstances, it indicates a wait of some lengthier period of time and that it is now almost time for the wait to be over.
In other words, if it just occurred to him yesterday for the first time that he can't find redemption when he's with Marlene because she's an emotional crutch for him, the power of that realization may have made him want to leave NOW - and not delay it.
The story I read made it seem he'd had this on his mind for quite some time. And that he knew all along that with Marlene by his side, his heart would be too at peace to want to face and settle his past, that with her there to lean on (like a crutch!) emotionally, he'd just end up burying it and never dealing.
That would make sense, since there's several things in
Case of Tifa which make it clear that he had been planning to stay - such as his original plan as stated to Cloud and Tifa:
The next day, Barret said in a serious tone, "How about we started a business and sold this wine?"
"We?" Cloud asked, surprised.
"Of course, you idiot! We can't draw customers! Tifa will have to do it."
....
"I dunno. But when we were half drunk yesterday, we laughed. We forgot all sorts of things right? That's the moment we're after." ~Case of Barret
Source:
http://ffviinovels.lhyeung.net/caseoftifa/page05.php
Seems clear to me that Barret's including himself as part of the business.
Seems clear to me he's not, since he never once makes any mention whatsoever about what he's going to do in this business. Sure, he helps build the place. He helps open the business. He never takes part in the actual running of said business. He has no role there, not one assigned to him nor one he chooses. Almost the moment the place is finished, he
leaves. It does not match up with the idea that he ever intended to stay there long term.
True, but the writer is writing from Barret's perspective. Therefore, it's from Barret's perspective that the writer says, "Cloud and Tifa's place".
The third person narration does give us more insight into Barret's mind than anyone else in the story, yes. And said narrative calls it "Cloud and Tifa's place" with no mention of Barret also having a claim to it as his own place. So if Barret was ever planning to live there... why is he only calling it their place, and not his own?
And again, if you write it in first person instead of third, it becomes clear that he could be referring to his own home, too:
It had been several months since that day—the chosen day. After helping Tifa and Cloud build our home, I entrusted my best friend Dyne's orphaned daughter Marlene to the two of them and embarked on a journey.
This is even worse than the first time you did this. Not cool lady. The story calls it Cloud and Tifa's home, rewriting the text to make Barret call it "our" home doesn't change what the ACTUAL STORY says.
But it can easily be inferred that she was wanting to "take off" in order to do it:
Am I the only one seeing how easy it is for you to infer things if you think it supports you, and how you demand direct statements in big flashing neon letters for the things that are ACTUALLY easy to infer? I doubt I am.
"I wanna go on a journey to settle my past."
Cloud nodded as if he understood.
"Settle your past...? But I want to do that too."
"You guys can do that here. Don't just take. Try proving that you can give too." ~Case of Tifa
Before we get to whatever you took from this passage, lemme tell ya what I see here. Barret wants to settle his past, and he feels the need to go on a journey to do so. Tifa wants to settle HER past too, but as Barret pointed out the best place for her to do that is at home, running her business with Cloud (and Marlene, since Barret fully intends to leave her with them at this time). Maybe Tifa would have wanted to go on a journey, maybe not. What we do know is that Barret has helped to give her everything she needs to settle her past without one. A home, a business, and a family.
Barret just finished saying that he was going on a journey in order to settle his past. Tifa says she wants to settle her past, too - so was she also wanting to go on a journey to do it, just like Barret? It's certainly possible.
And you can't support it one way or another. Maybe she did, who knows? I don't and neither do you. We do know what she decided to do, though, and that was to stay with Cloud and Marlene and settle her past that way.
Why else did Barret specify that she could do it here? Sounds like Barret thought that Tifa meant she wanted to leave, too.
Maybe he did think she wanted to leave. If so, was he right? Would Tifa have left without the home and business and family to give her a place to belong and settle her past in safety? If she went, would she have taken Cloud with her? Could she have left him behind, considering he has stated his intention to have her by his side from now on already at this point?
Most important question, since she DID stay to run the business, be with Cloud and raise Marlene together... do any of these "maybes" matter?
I can't answer that for Tifa. Was leaving Marlene behind necessary to settle Barret's past? He seemed to think so. Cloud seemed to think it was necessary to leave Tifa behind when he moved into Aerith's Church. If Barret and Cloud can leave people behind, so can Tifa.
Objection. Cloud did NOT go to the church to settle his past. Cloud went to the church to drag his past around with him until the geostigma inevitably killed him. He went there to suffer and wallow in his guilt and pain, not to put it behind him and move on. The man DID NOT THINK he had any chance of moving on at all by this time. He left Tifa and the kids behind so they didn't have to WATCH HIM SUFFER AND DIE.
ZurruZurru ZurruZurru, remember? Its not the same as what Barret did and you should know it by now.
Yes, she tends to be insecure - but that's not the point I'm making. My point is that Tifa has no reason to be insecure IF Cloud is making it clear to Tifa that he loves her and wants to be with her and wants to share his future with her.
Because insecure people become immediately uber-confident when someone makes expressions of their feelings to them, right? You can't deny that Cloud HAS SAID, TO TIFA, that he intends to have her by his side from now on. That is fact, you can read it yourself. So even if you're fighting the fact that he loves her, by your logic that means she should never be insecure about Cloud again. She's Tifa, she is gonna have her insecure moments anyway.
The story doesn't call it anything in particular before Barret leaves.
Then it was never called Barret's home at all, was it? When the story refers to it as someone's home, its Cloud and Tifa's place. Thanks for pointing out that the story does not back you up until you rewrite it Annie
Okay, fair enough. However, there's also nothing inherent in the word "journey" to imply that he won't return. I took a journey to Europe a number of years ago, and I was gone for over a year. However, I did return home.
That sounds more like a "trip to Europe" to me. With a trip, its a given that you plan to come back. With a journey, the duration of your travel is less exact, especially if your journey is open ended and doesn't have a defined stopping point like Barret's. You may not ever make it back at all. Now I don't disagree that Barret could and probably intends to come back for his daughter someday. I do disagree with you treating that as a given fact when we really cannot know this.
And you said yourself that it's likely Barret will return home:
And of course Barret will be back someday. His daughter is there. That doesn't entail that he's going to live at Seventh Heaven, though. ~Tres, Nov 6
And as I pointed out before - it doesn't entail that he's NOT going to live at Seventh Heaven, either.
Doesn't entail that he WILL either. It seems unlikely to me considering the stress the story puts on it being Cloud and Tifa's place, and NOT Barret's, but he COULD move in there somewhere down the road. Ergo, without knowing for sure, we can only use the details we DO know. We DO know Barret does not live there now, and that Cloud and Tifa DO and are raising a family together.
But the story only said that Marlene had always slept with Tifa - not with Cloud and Tifa.
I will give you that, by my own logic (what I said when you tried to say Cloud being asleep on the couch makes Tifa's actions less creepy when it does not). She and Denzel have their own room with single sized beds by the time of AC/C though, so she doesn't look to be sleeping with Tifa forever.
And just to reiterate, the voice of the narrator is speaking from Barret's perspective.
And just to reiterate, it still never gives Barret any ownership of 7th Heaven as either a home or a business, and places these roles directly on Cloud and Tifa. What are you trying to argue exactly?
In the first place, I don't agree that it's "officially Cloud and Tifa's home".
You don't agree with what the story and Ultimanias directly tell us? Shocking, that is. Folks, Anastar will refuse to agree with and accept ANYTHING that would be bad for her position. We already knew this, but its been confirmed once again right here.
However, if you want substantiation, I refer again to where Barret suggested to Cloud and Tifa that "WE" start a business together.
"Hey yo Cloud, I think WE should start a business that'll be entirely dependent on Tifa. No, I ain't gonna work there, just get it started. I got to get out and settle my past! Just didn't wanna leave you dumbasses hangin! Watch my kid for me ya spikey headed runt!"
Too much sarcasm? I'll just flat say "start" does not equal "work at" then. He can help them get it going without ever intending to stay.
He was including himself in the business.
Was he? Again, "We should open a business" can easily refer to him helping them get the joint built and stocked before leaving. That would be the three of them OPENING the business. He doesn't have to plan on sticking around once the opening is complete.
He helped Cloud and Tifa build the Seventh Heaven for that business that he was intending to run with them.
Show me where he said he had such an intention. Go on, I'll wait. I won't hold my breath, but I'll wait.
So the Seventh Heaven is officially Cloud and Barret and Tifa's business, according to Case of Tifa. Why wouldn't he return once he resolves his past?
It is never called this. Ever. It is officially, according to the narrative, Tifa and Cloud's place. Barret's name is never attached to it. Nothing declares his intention to stay and work there with them. Again, ever. He helps open the business, and then he leaves it to Tifa and Cloud. Why would he return to a place he never had a role in? For that matter, how long does it take a man to settle his past? It very much seems to be a "It'll be done when its done" kind of task doesn't it? For all we know, Marlene could be out of school and have a place of her own by the time he finishes this journey. Considering he doesn't know when this train he's gotten on will stop, Barret may not even be MAKING plans for what to do afterward just yet.
I was insulted. I've pointed out my own family situation regarding my daughter when you tried to force Barret into the nuclear family before, so you should know that YES YOU ARE.
And yes, I've seen such a family, since I had two foster children living with me for almost two years.
The fact that you are not insulted by your attitude towards such families does not mean no one ever will be. Especially when someone (me) has voiced such feelings before.
What you say doesn't rule out that fact that Marlene still regards Barret as her father.
NO ONE IS SAYING SHE DOESN'T!
In some foster families, the foster kids call their foster parents Mom and Dad. In other foster families, the foster kids call the foster parents by their first names.
Either way, the foster parents are still most definitely their foster PARENTS, and thus still family. This is part of my issue with you pointing out the fact that the kids call Cloud and Tifa by name, it is meaningless if they do or not.
Regardless of what the foster child calls the foster parent(s), it doesn't mean that the biological parent(s) aren't still the real parent(s).
Well thank the gods, my daughter is still mine then despite her having TWO MORE father figures. I can rest easy now, eh?
There is absolutely nothing to indicate that Barret won't come back and live at the Seventh Heaven.
There is absolutely nothing to indicate that he WILL live there either, nor any estimate of when he would come back to stay if he even intends to.
[quote[Marlene obviously considers Barret part of her family, since she still calls him "Daddy".[/quote]
Her family, yes. Barret is Marlene's family. He is not part of THE family being discussed, that being Tifa, Cloud, Marlene, and Denzel. Denzel does not in fact even know who the fuck he IS until near the end of AC/C. Marlene has TWO families, just like my daughter. Barret is NOT PART of the
7th Heaven family.
In Case of Tifa, Marlene invited Cloud into the family.
Are you STILL on about that? A little girl with a sense of humor makes a teasing remark, which Cloud reacts to with polite seriousness as is his habit, and yet we're meant to take it literally huh? Cloud WOULDN'T be in the family if Marlene hadn't invited him, is that it?
Since Marlene's the one inviting Cloud into the family, and Marlene considers Barret part of the family,
Please stop saying this. Two families. Happens all the time. If you've fostered kids you should know how this works.
then Barret would be part of the nuclear family, too.
No, he wouldn't. For Denzel at least he'd be a family friend or, at best, a weird uncle with a badass arm. Neither of these things are nuclear family material. The ONLY person he would be NUCLEAR FAMILY to would be Marlene. Again, that girl has TWO families.
Also, Tifa includes Barret in the family when she says that the family is made up of friends.
The family of friends that she was a part of BEFORE the 7th Heaven family was formed. The family of friends she did not bother to inform her kid, Denzel, about until they showed up to kick a dragon's ass. That family of friends is, and I'll make sure you notice this part cause it's important,
NOT THE NUCLEAR FAMILY WE ARE DISCUSSING!!!!1!!!ONE!!!
At the end of AC/ACC, we see two pictures. One with Cloud, Tifa, Denzel and Marlene.
That's a picture of the nuclear family. That is THE family, the 7th Heaven family. Note that Barret is not in that one.
The other picture is Cloud, Tifa, Denzel, Marlene, Barret, Cid, Yuffie, Vincent, Cait Sith, and RedXIII with Aerith's flowers in front. These are the friends that Tifa originally said are part of the family.
That is the 7th Heaven family (Cloud/Tifa/Denzel/Marlene ONLY) and the family of friends that is AVALANCHE. Two families, related but distinct, being photographed together. Again, Tifa NEVER SAID her friends were part of THE family, which is obvious to anyone who isn't twisting shit in their favor against all logic since THE family DIDN'T EXIST when she said it.
And you claim not to be dishonest? I gotta echo Tres, why do you
always lie?
It's obvious that any of them would be welcome to stay at the Seventh Heaven. These are the friends Cloud and Tifa traveled with throughout FFVII - the same friends that show up in AC/ACC and other parts of the Compilation, and the same friends who show up in AU games like Kingdom Hearts. They can easily be considered part of the family.
I'm sure the family would welcome any of the friends from the OG into their home yes. They are their close friends, allies, etc. They saved the world together, they're tight. That doesn't make them part of THE family. My uncle stayed with us for years when I was younger. He was family, but not part of the nuclear family unit that was my parents, me, and my siblings. YOU can easily consider them part of THE family, but only by ignoring what said family IS. Those of us who acknowledge these simple facts, we cannot so easily consider them as such because THEY'RE NOT!
Also, AU games are not compilation. Didn't you have a thing about NOT going outside the compilation a while back? Pick a position on SOMETHING already, would ya?
I said this yesterday, but I'll say it again. I'm not trying to prove that I'm right and you're wrong.
Yes you are, and I'll tell ya why below.
I'm trying to show that there is more than one way to interpret the situation.
And we're saying there is only one CORRECT way to interpret the situation. You are, therefore, trying to prove us wrong. You may not be arguing explicitly for Clerith is canon, but "there is no canon at all" is just as much in opposition to our position of "Cloti is canon" anyway. You ARE trying to prove us wrong, or at least you should be if you hold that position. Its still a debate, you still need to support your side of things, and you still can't do that without rampant dishonesty. Which, for the record, isn't real support.
What I'm saying is just as likely and just as valid as what you're saying. SE left it open to interpretation.
No, and no again. You aren't supporting what you say with REAL, FACTUAL evidence from the Comp. or its sourcebooks. The best you can do is point out some areas where neither side has a concrete bit of proof, like whether or not Barret will live at 7th Heaven when he comes back. These do not support your position, they just remove one piece of potential support from ours, and we have plenty more that can't be so removed. You have just about nothing to back up your claims, so no what you say is neither as likely nor as valid as ours on the majority of important issues.
Further, SE has no doubt left many things open to the imagination. The resolution to the love triangle that was (past tense, was) Tifa-->Cloud<--Aerith is NOT ONE OF THEM. That has been clearly spelled out for anyone who knows where to look.
And how does that make me wrong? All I said was that Denzel and Marlene call Cloud and Tifa by their first names.
And it was pointed out to you that despite this, Denzel is directly said to view Tifa as his mom and Cloud as his dad. Ergo, they are Denzel's family. And just to reiterate once more, despite it not being explicitly mentioned in what I am quoting here, Barret is not.
I never said that one expressed romantic intentions and the other did not. According to the scenario I described, both had said they weren't romantically interested.
And you still cannot reconcile this "sharing of disinterest" with the fact that the LA version features a conversation that is "apathetic and ends short" with no such sharing occurring. You fail still to mesh this with the official status of Tifa's feelings of love and interest in Cloud being very much present beyond the HW scene.
And right now, Tifa is NOT interested.
Bullshit. Back up this claim or stop making it, please.
She may have in the back of her mind that someday she hopes things might work out between them - but for now, she knows that it's not a good idea to get involved with Cloud, so she has no intentions of getting romantically involved.
Same as the above. Bullshit. Back this up with something concrete if you can. Concrete means no quote mines, no twisting of the words, no making shit up wholesale, and no "maybe" or "possibly" type statements. Show us something that DID happen or WAS said, either by the characters or their creators, that supports your conclusion that Tifa believes its a bad idea to get involved with Cloud, and that she therefore somehow both has no intention of getting romantically involved with him/is hoping things will work out between them WHICH IS A DELAYED BY PRESENT INTEREST IN GETTING ROMANTICALLY INVOLVED and therefore totally contradictory to your own position. If you can't do that, (the if really isn't necessary here) then you need to stop pretending this is a valid view of events.
Yes, I can substantiate it with the fact that Cloud leaves at the end of Case of Tifa to live in Aerith's Church. We have no idea how long he was planning to leave before he left.
He left when he got geostigma and started
dying, not to settle his past. This does not substantiate your claims that Cloud
might have wanted to leave all along, especially in light of his direct statement of intent to have Tifa by his side
from then on.
No, I said that Case of Tifa showed that Barret's original plan was to stay there, which would mean that he was planning to live there.
And then many holes were poked in your claim. You showed nothing but maybes and could bes to begin with, and I personally have showed how you could be quite wrong in this very post. And what you just said above fails to refute Tres at all.
Anastar Some Time In The Past said:
The world as they knew it is disheveled right now. All of them are feeling guilty. All of them are wanting to find redemption for their sins. None of them are sure how to do it. It doesn't seem to me that any of them have any definite plans at this point.
Tres Some Time In The Slightly More Recent Past said:
You just said Barret definitely planned to stay at Seventh Heaven. Please pick a consistent position.
Do you not see the contradiction in claiming Barret is shown in CoT to plan on staying and working at 7th Heaven AND simultaneously claiming no one has any definite plans at all? Cause we see it. And we are most definitely calling you on it.
Would you PLEASE stop thinking that I'm trying to prove you wrong?
If you do not intend to prove us wrong, with our position being "The Love Triangle has been resolved and Cloud is officially with Tifa," then would you concede and get it over with? Again, "there is no canon" is still in opposition to "Cloti is canon" just as much as your former position of "Clerith is canon" was.
I think either interpretation is possible. I think Cloud can love either Aerith or Tifa. I think it's optional and up to the player.
You think wrong, and if you want anyone to believe you you'll need to support it with factual evidence. But if you're not trying to prove your case, which would in turn be the only way to prove us wrong, you're never going to do that, so again if you have no intention of doing so then we will gladly accept your concession and congratulate your tenacity for hanging in there so long
When I said that the LA version is indicated, I mean that Tifa's complex feelings would substantiate the LA version instead of the HA version. It's more evidence of one than the other. I do not think it proves that the LA scene happens, but it is evidence to show that the LA version is possible.
Except its not. You have to out and out make shit up about the LA version to force it to fit with your warped view of the narrative while simultaneously ignoring the official status of the HA version for that to even be possible. The LA version is not indicated by anything, it did not happen.
Possible, BTW, is indicated by the word COULD, which I put in caps so you wouldn't miss it.
We know what words like could and possible mean Annie. It's not something really complex, like how labels work or what a chair looks like.
Here, I will put this in caps, too, so you won't miss it:
EITHER THE HA OR LA VERSION IS POSSIBLE. THE HA VERSION INDICATES THAT CLOUD LOVES TIFA. THE LA VERSION INDICATES THAT CLOUD DOES NOT LOVE TIFA. BOTH VERSIONS ARE POSSIBLE. THAT'S WHY I SAY THERE IS NO CANON.
I shall return the favor for you, and use caps so YOU don't miss this:
YOU ARE INCORRECT, THE HA VERSION IS CONFIRMED AS THE OFFICIAL. PAGE 232 DOES NOT CHANGE THIS, IT IN FACT REINFORCES IT WITH A DIRECT STATEMENT THAT MUTUAL FEELINGS WERE SHARED. NO SUCH SHARING OCCURS IN THE LA VERSION DESPITE THE CLAIMS OF SUCH YOU HAVE PULLED FROM YOUR ASS. ONLY ONE VERSION IS POSSIBLE GIVEN THIS INFORMATION. THAT'S WHY YOU ARE WRONG, BECAUSE THERE IS A CANON OUTCOME.
SE says that both versions are possible:
Blatant goddamn lies do not make for an honest and open debate.
(quotes removed because this is a long response and we all have seen them already)
Sorry, I only have those quotes in blue font - I have no idea how to change the color to regular font. If I choose black, then everyone says they can't see it.
Just remove the color tags when you post them in the reply field, and they'll go back to normal color.
But SE says right there that both versions are possible. The script of both the LA and HA versions can be found in the FFVII Ultimania Omega.
Still ignoring that it DOES NOT SAY they are both possible in the narrative. It says depending on how YOU played, you can see either one. It goes on to say that events we know to only happen in one version DID happen. End of. QED. You are still pretending that the presence of a deviation means we cannot possibly know which one happened, but we CAN know this.
Furthermore, you have said yourself that how often something appears does not indicate that it is canon. From your essay on my site:
While it's true that Maiden of the Planet is never listed as being part of the Compilation, this does not necessarily mean that it isn't canon. For example, let's take FFVII Kaitai Shinsho or FFVII Dismantled to English speaking fans. It is an official strategy guide by Square Enix that was released in 1997 with official interviews, information on the game, materia, enemies and weapons, and even monologues by the characters.... Dismantled and the Ultimanias are never listed as part of the Compilation, but they do, in fact, contain official and correct information that Square approves and publishes in many books.
Things that are not listed as part of the Compilation does not exclude them from being canon or official. This should not be used as a reason for Maiden not being official. ~Maiden of the Canon, by Quexinos and TresDias
You say that MotP is still official/canon even though it's not listed as part of the Compilation. You say that Dismantled and the Ultimania's are never listed as part of the Compilation, but they are still canon.
So why does the LA version of the HW scene need to be in story summaries before it's considered official/canon? According to you, it doesn't matter whether something is cited frequently or not.
Just because Tres argues there that Maiden CAN be considered canon does not mean that all information has the same weight. A story summary is, by definition, a summary of WHAT HAPPENED in the story. It directly tells us mutual feelings WERE shared under the HW. No feelings are shared in the LA version. Ergo, HA version is official. It is a very different matter from considering that Maiden just might have happened.
SE has stated that the HW scene diverges into two conditions. The script of the LA version is in the FFVII UO. SE considers both versions valid.
See above, with an additional "no they don't and you need to support it for real if you want us to believe they do" added on.
I really wanted to get to the "dishonesty" accusations tonight, but I have no more time. I'll get to it tomorrow night.
Well, you've gotten several new accusations to respond to from me with the post you just made. Here's a tip, stop being dishonest and you wouldn't NEED to respond to these accusations. Keep it up and you'll never catch up on dealing with them all.