Shademp
420
any explanation for Ozai's parental abuse of Zuko does not justify it,
The abuse is certainly not justified, but to me the abuse felt more cruel and shocking when we pictured that Ozai knowingly hurt his biological son. Some of that impact is lost to me because now, with the reveal of Ikem, the abuse doesn't shock me as much. Ozai is still a simple evil guy but he looks more evil to me when he scars his biological son, rather than a son that is not his own. The same deal with Ozai banishing Zuko; it is true that the narrative focuses on Zuko's empathy being the main cause behind his banishment, but now that we see him as Ikem's son, the banishment *becomes* different to the viewer. The banishment feels less unexpectedly cruel with Zuko as Ikem's son and not Ozai's.
The flashback scene from The Search Part 2, when the royal family is dining together, doesn't help. Ozai has just learned of Zuko's true parentage, which is when the reader sees the first example of Ozai's abuse. He scolds Zuko and tells him he was lucky to be born. While possible that Ozai spoke like this to his son before, and we already know from The Promise that he found Zuko's empathy peculiar, the impact I get from this is that the abuse started with Ozai learning about Ikem. This in turn changes how I view all later examples of abuse.
In short, my emotional investment in Zuko's journey is compromised because the structure of family ties affects how I perceive the characters. So our disagreement is based on personal taste. To me, the impact of Ozai's cruelty is lessened by this retroactive continuity. To you, it is not (and I totally respect that).
The flashback scene from The Search Part 2, when the royal family is dining together, doesn't help. Ozai has just learned of Zuko's true parentage, which is when the reader sees the first example of Ozai's abuse. He scolds Zuko and tells him he was lucky to be born. While possible that Ozai spoke like this to his son before, and we already know from The Promise that he found Zuko's empathy peculiar, the impact I get from this is that the abuse started with Ozai learning about Ikem. This in turn changes how I view all later examples of abuse.
In short, my emotional investment in Zuko's journey is compromised because the structure of family ties affects how I perceive the characters. So our disagreement is based on personal taste. To me, the impact of Ozai's cruelty is lessened by this retroactive continuity. To you, it is not (and I totally respect that).
I actually do like Zuko's internal struggle, but I can't find it clever or satisfying enough unless it turns out that Ozai is Zuko's father and that Ozai has known for a long time that Ikem was not the father. If my "best scenario" unfolds, then I will commend the authors for being really clever.Also the revelation was not just done for shock value, as Mike DiMartino explained it was done to give Zuko further internal struggles to deal with and explore.