This whole thing began with you saying
"Cloud only knew Aerith for about 3 weeks. Maybe a bit less, or a bit more" as a refutation to this comment from Sasseli:
"I do think that the creators intended for Aerith to fall in love with Cloud. No, they definitely did(there's too many quotes to deny it)."
Again, it is plain as day that your argument here was that this timeframe is too short for romantic love to form. Thus, you were applying an anecdotal-at-best claim for people in general to these characters in particular.
Are you done now with this pointless goose chase of deflecting?
Me pointing out that you continuously keep cherrypicking and oversimplifying my arguments is not deflecting.
This "three weeks" argument you keep relying on is the perfect example. Had you kept reading, you would have noticed that I actually qualified my statement, and I quote myself again from the link that YOU posted: "Their relationship in the OG ended on the "I want to meet the real you" note, which is hardly a love confession."
You're shifting the goal post now.
Your claim was that Cloud never agreed to be her bodyguard. I pointed out that he not only does as she requested, making sure they both escape to the rooftops, but he also says himself that he's going to be her bodyguard -- right after they get out of the church, Aerith asks him "So... what's next for you?" and he replies "A little bit of bodyguard work."
I didn't remember that part, and in a debate it's normal for someone to expect the other to post evidence along with their assertions.
I'm not shifting the goal post. I wasn't just responding to you. I was also responding(or reiterating my arguments towards) to
@Master Bates, who I was also debating with at the time:
https://thelifestream.net/forums/threads/ltd-remake-—-its-like-new-coke-except-no-its-exactly-like-new-coke.22509/page-82#post-864575
I didn't say that you were. I've overlooked a good bit of it for the sake of not ripping a number of posts apart. Why are you so unwilling to stay on point in a conversation? =|
I said that if you're insisting on analyzing the original game like a standalone piece, take it where people aren't referencing developer input with every reasonable expectation that it be acknowledged ... rather than disrespectfully thrown back in their face the way you have been doing.
Probably because staying on point in this conversation would mean me giving into your uncharitable interpretations of my posts. Anyways, I wasn't insisting on anything. I was responding to a quote by Kitase(about the original) that YOU posted. Which you then accused me of derailing for.
You don't seem understand that I don't mind if people refer to external material, I simply believe that the actual product should be considered primary to any developer input.
I'm not going to claim to be innocent of posting off-topic things, but in that specific instance it was me following where your post led.
Which I later amended.
It isn't going unnoticed, by the way, that you discard the actual commentary of the developers when you don't like it ... while justifying your incorrect claims about the story in comments like this where you reference the development of the game ... but for which you don't have any actual developer annotations to cite.
If it contradicts what's actually in the canon game/movie/etc, yah I think that should be considered above developer post-edits. Btw, I don't actually know if AC is canon anymore. I was hoping you could tell me.
Also, I do believe that I acknowledged in my conversation with
@Cat on Mars that something may have been lost in translation when I read Kitase's quote, or Nojima's "koibito" line.
Alright, let me slightly reword what I said then:
"No reasonable interpretation of Cloud's association with Aerith in the original game would be that it's all focused around guilt on the basis of that scene. =|"
Now can I get an actual reply there instead of yet another insulting, face-slapping, ineffectual attempt at deflection? =|
Insulting?
- You've accused me of arguing in bad faith, while you cherrypicked my arguments.
- You've accused me of deflecting for calling it out.
- You've accused me of having ulterior motives when I made it known that I wasn't comfortable arguing against personal anecdotes.
- You've accused me of shifting the goal post, when I was reiterating an argument to you that I had made to someone else making a similar point.
- You've accused me of derailing, when I was simply responding to your quote by Kitase.
- You've accused me of insisting on a "literary analysis based solely on the content of the original game" when all I was doing was stating my opinion.
- You've accused me of
"disrespectfully throwing [external material] back in [your] face" simply because I either didn't agree or I misinterpreted something.
@
The Twilight Mexican I'm done. I'm not playing the victim or anything, but if you're going to debate me in such a conspiratorial manner, then I'm not gonna continue this conversation while you blame me for everything. I tried being cordial, but even that was interpreted as malice. I can see when a situation is pointless.